Thermodynamic, economic and environmental assessment of advanced transcritical CO2 supermarket refrigeration architectures with maintenance-cost sensitivity analysis
Miguel Ferro, Sandrina Pereira, Luís Filipe Baptista, Luis Alfonso Díaz-Secades
{"title":"Thermodynamic, economic and environmental assessment of advanced transcritical CO2 supermarket refrigeration architectures with maintenance-cost sensitivity analysis","authors":"Miguel Ferro, Sandrina Pereira, Luís Filipe Baptista, Luis Alfonso Díaz-Secades","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.149572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Modern supermarket refrigeration systems are progressively transitioning toward low-global-warming-potential solutions, with transcritical CO<sub>2</sub> architectures emerging as promising alternatives to conventional synthetic refrigerants. However, the thermodynamically optimal refrigeration technology may not necessarily coincide with the most suitable solution for industrial implementation. This study compares a conventional booster cycle (BC), a parallel-compression system (PC), and a booster cycle with low-pressure ejectors (BLPE) through a thermodynamic, economic, environmental, and dual-layer multi-criteria assessment. Annual simulations are performed using location-specific outdoor dry-bulb temperature profiles for Berlin (Germany), Lisbon (Portugal), Albuquerque (United States), and Singapore under a fixed supermarket load profile, while LCC, TEWI, and the quantitative technical-MCDM assessment are restricted to the Lisbon reference case. Relative to BC, model-predicted annual electricity-consumption reductions range from 10.55% to 11.68% for PC and from 12.38% to 12.62% for BLPE. In Lisbon, PC and BLPE reduce LCC by 7.11% and 8.74%, respectively, and TEWI by 10.80% and 12.50%. BLPE therefore provides the best quantitative technical performance, although its baseline LCC advantage over PC is eliminated by an additional annual maintenance-cost premium of approximately 803 Euro/year. In contrast, the expert-informed adoption-readiness layer ranks PC first; PC occupies first position in 85.5% of bootstrap expert-resampling realizations and in 99.293–99.957% of Monte Carlo criterion-weight realizations across TOPSIS, VIKOR, and EDAS. These results indicate that thermodynamic superiority and industrial adoption readiness may diverge, and that maintenance-cost tolerance and implementation perceptions should be considered alongside modeled performance when selecting advanced CO<sub>2</sub> refrigeration architectures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"579 ","pages":"Article 149572"},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965262602113X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Modern supermarket refrigeration systems are progressively transitioning toward low-global-warming-potential solutions, with transcritical CO2 architectures emerging as promising alternatives to conventional synthetic refrigerants. However, the thermodynamically optimal refrigeration technology may not necessarily coincide with the most suitable solution for industrial implementation. This study compares a conventional booster cycle (BC), a parallel-compression system (PC), and a booster cycle with low-pressure ejectors (BLPE) through a thermodynamic, economic, environmental, and dual-layer multi-criteria assessment. Annual simulations are performed using location-specific outdoor dry-bulb temperature profiles for Berlin (Germany), Lisbon (Portugal), Albuquerque (United States), and Singapore under a fixed supermarket load profile, while LCC, TEWI, and the quantitative technical-MCDM assessment are restricted to the Lisbon reference case. Relative to BC, model-predicted annual electricity-consumption reductions range from 10.55% to 11.68% for PC and from 12.38% to 12.62% for BLPE. In Lisbon, PC and BLPE reduce LCC by 7.11% and 8.74%, respectively, and TEWI by 10.80% and 12.50%. BLPE therefore provides the best quantitative technical performance, although its baseline LCC advantage over PC is eliminated by an additional annual maintenance-cost premium of approximately 803 Euro/year. In contrast, the expert-informed adoption-readiness layer ranks PC first; PC occupies first position in 85.5% of bootstrap expert-resampling realizations and in 99.293–99.957% of Monte Carlo criterion-weight realizations across TOPSIS, VIKOR, and EDAS. These results indicate that thermodynamic superiority and industrial adoption readiness may diverge, and that maintenance-cost tolerance and implementation perceptions should be considered alongside modeled performance when selecting advanced CO2 refrigeration architectures.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.