The Health Impacts of the January 2025 Los Angeles Wildfires among Unhoused Communities

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Evan Michael Shannon,Jessie Chien,Benjamin F. Henwood,Randall Kuhn
{"title":"The Health Impacts of\nthe January 2025 Los Angeles\nWildfires among Unhoused Communities","authors":"Evan Michael Shannon,Jessie Chien,Benjamin F. Henwood,Randall Kuhn","doi":"10.1021/ehp.6c00626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The impact of the devastating January 2025 Los Angeles (LA) County wildfire and extreme wind event (“firestorm”) on the health trajectory of people experiencing homelessness (PEH) is unknown. The study objective was to determine the health and social impacts of the firestorm on PEH in LA County. We analyzed data from the Periodic Assessment of Trajectories of Housing, Homelessness, and Health Study (PATHS), an ongoing longitudinal monthly panel survey of roughly 500 PEH in LA County. We administered survey questions on firestorm exposure 2 weeks after the firestorm began. We conducted analyses to assess relationships between sociodemographic factors and firestorm exposure and performed difference-in-differences analyses using mixed-effects logistic regression models to determine associations between firestorm exposure variables and self-reported health, controlling for sociodemographic variables. Of the 534 active PATHS participants, 403 were included in the primary analytic sample. 55.6% of survey participants reported disruption from the firestorm. Non-Hispanic Black/African American respondents had higher odds of reporting disruption compared to non-Hispanic White respondents (aOR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.16–4.40), as did those who were primarily unsheltered (aOR = 4.43, 95% CI: 2.70–7.40) or displaced (aOR = 2.75, 95% CI: 1.68–4.56) in the past month. Difference-in-differences analyses found no consistent evidence of associations between firestorm-related disruption and subsequent outcomes, with confidence intervals for all estimates spanning the null. Our findings suggest that unsheltered PEH were especially vulnerable to the firestorm but that the firestorm did not significantly affect longitudinal measurements of self-reported health, which were already poor at baseline.","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/ehp.6c00626","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The impact of the devastating January 2025 Los Angeles (LA) County wildfire and extreme wind event (“firestorm”) on the health trajectory of people experiencing homelessness (PEH) is unknown. The study objective was to determine the health and social impacts of the firestorm on PEH in LA County. We analyzed data from the Periodic Assessment of Trajectories of Housing, Homelessness, and Health Study (PATHS), an ongoing longitudinal monthly panel survey of roughly 500 PEH in LA County. We administered survey questions on firestorm exposure 2 weeks after the firestorm began. We conducted analyses to assess relationships between sociodemographic factors and firestorm exposure and performed difference-in-differences analyses using mixed-effects logistic regression models to determine associations between firestorm exposure variables and self-reported health, controlling for sociodemographic variables. Of the 534 active PATHS participants, 403 were included in the primary analytic sample. 55.6% of survey participants reported disruption from the firestorm. Non-Hispanic Black/African American respondents had higher odds of reporting disruption compared to non-Hispanic White respondents (aOR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.16–4.40), as did those who were primarily unsheltered (aOR = 4.43, 95% CI: 2.70–7.40) or displaced (aOR = 2.75, 95% CI: 1.68–4.56) in the past month. Difference-in-differences analyses found no consistent evidence of associations between firestorm-related disruption and subsequent outcomes, with confidence intervals for all estimates spanning the null. Our findings suggest that unsheltered PEH were especially vulnerable to the firestorm but that the firestorm did not significantly affect longitudinal measurements of self-reported health, which were already poor at baseline.
2025年1月洛杉矶野火对无家可归社区的健康影响
2025年1月毁灭性的洛杉矶(LA)县野火和极端风事件(“火风暴”)对无家可归者(PEH)健康轨迹的影响尚不清楚。研究目的是确定火灾对洛杉矶县PEH的健康和社会影响。我们分析了住房、无家可归和健康轨迹定期评估研究(PATHS)的数据,这是一项对洛杉矶县大约500个PEH进行的纵向月度小组调查。我们在火灾开始两周后进行了关于火灾暴露的调查问题。我们进行了分析,以评估社会人口因素与火灾风暴暴露之间的关系,并使用混合效应逻辑回归模型进行差异中差异分析,以确定火灾风暴暴露变量与自我报告健康之间的关联,控制社会人口变量。在534名活跃的PATHS参与者中,403人被纳入主要分析样本。55.6%的调查参与者报告了火灾风暴造成的破坏。与非西班牙裔白人受访者相比,非西班牙裔黑人/非洲裔美国人受访者报告中断的几率更高(aOR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.16-4.40),在过去一个月里,主要没有庇护的人(aOR = 4.43, 95% CI: 2.70-7.40)或流离失所的人(aOR = 2.75, 95% CI: 1.68-4.56)也是如此。差异中的差异分析发现,火灾风暴相关的破坏与随后的结果之间没有一致的关联证据,所有估计的置信区间都跨越了零。我们的研究结果表明,未受保护的PEH特别容易受到火灾风暴的影响,但火灾风暴并没有显著影响自我报告健康的纵向测量,这些测量在基线时已经很差了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
388
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书