In the Age of AI—Are National Models and Data Sets Still Important for Stream Flow Prediction?

IF 6.3 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Brett Snider,Ehsan Roshani
{"title":"In the Age of AI—Are National Models and Data Sets Still Important for Stream Flow Prediction?","authors":"Brett Snider,Ehsan Roshani","doi":"10.1029/2025wr042530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Accurate streamflow prediction is critical for effective water resource management, and recent advances in deep learning and multi‐basin data sets have significantly improved model skill. Global deep‐learning models, trained on thousands of catchments have demonstrated strong generalization across diverse climates and continents. However, these models rely solely on globally available meteorological inputs, potentially overlooking the value of nationally developed data sets with enhanced regional accuracy. In this study, we assess the benefit of using Canada's high‐resolution national reanalysis data set (CaSR) in long short‐term memory (LSTM) models for streamflow prediction. We compare model performance using different meteorological forcings, global (ERA5‐Land), continental (Daymet), national (CaSR), and a combined “Complete” model, across over 1,000 Canadian stream gauges. Model performance is evaluated using the Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Kling‐Gupta Efficiency (KGE) and related metrics. We also benchmark our best‐performing model against Google's global LSTM streamflow model at 412 Canadian gauges. Results show that national‐scale deep‐learning models using CaSR outperforms deep‐learning models using only global or continental inputs. The Complete model achieved the highest performance, with a median KGE 0.886−exceeding the 0.839 achieved by Google's global model within Canada. These findings suggest that nationally trained models using a wide array of inputs, including national meteorological data sets, can outperform state‐of‐the‐art global deep‐learning models that do not use such data when applied within their region of origin. For countries with dense observational networks and distinct hydrological regimes, investing in national data sets and models can enhance deep‐learning model prediction accuracy, leading to improved resilience to climate extremes and local water management decisions.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2025wr042530","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Accurate streamflow prediction is critical for effective water resource management, and recent advances in deep learning and multi‐basin data sets have significantly improved model skill. Global deep‐learning models, trained on thousands of catchments have demonstrated strong generalization across diverse climates and continents. However, these models rely solely on globally available meteorological inputs, potentially overlooking the value of nationally developed data sets with enhanced regional accuracy. In this study, we assess the benefit of using Canada's high‐resolution national reanalysis data set (CaSR) in long short‐term memory (LSTM) models for streamflow prediction. We compare model performance using different meteorological forcings, global (ERA5‐Land), continental (Daymet), national (CaSR), and a combined “Complete” model, across over 1,000 Canadian stream gauges. Model performance is evaluated using the Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Kling‐Gupta Efficiency (KGE) and related metrics. We also benchmark our best‐performing model against Google's global LSTM streamflow model at 412 Canadian gauges. Results show that national‐scale deep‐learning models using CaSR outperforms deep‐learning models using only global or continental inputs. The Complete model achieved the highest performance, with a median KGE 0.886−exceeding the 0.839 achieved by Google's global model within Canada. These findings suggest that nationally trained models using a wide array of inputs, including national meteorological data sets, can outperform state‐of‐the‐art global deep‐learning models that do not use such data when applied within their region of origin. For countries with dense observational networks and distinct hydrological regimes, investing in national data sets and models can enhance deep‐learning model prediction accuracy, leading to improved resilience to climate extremes and local water management decisions.
在人工智能时代,国家模型和数据集对河流流量预测仍然重要吗?
准确的流量预测对于有效的水资源管理至关重要,而深度学习和多流域数据集的最新进展显著提高了模型技能。在数千个集水区进行训练的全球深度学习模型显示出在不同气候和大陆上的强大泛化能力。然而,这些模式完全依赖于全球可获得的气象输入,可能忽略了国家开发的具有更高区域精度的数据集的价值。在这项研究中,我们评估了在长短期记忆(LSTM)模型中使用加拿大高分辨率国家再分析数据集(CaSR)进行流量预测的好处。我们使用不同的气象强迫,全球(ERA5‐Land)、大陆(Daymet)、国家(CaSR)和一个综合的“完整”模式,在超过1000个加拿大流量表中比较了模型的性能。使用Nash-Sutcliffe效率(NSE)、Kling - Gupta效率(KGE)和相关指标评估模型性能。我们还将我们的最佳表现模型与谷歌的全球LSTM流模型在412个加拿大量表进行基准测试。结果表明,使用CaSR的国家尺度深度学习模型优于仅使用全球或大陆输入的深度学习模型。Complete模型取得了最高的性能,KGE中位数为0.886 -超过了b谷歌全球模型在加拿大取得的0.839。这些发现表明,使用包括国家气象数据集在内的广泛输入的国家训练模型,在应用于其原产区域时,可以优于不使用此类数据的最先进的全球深度学习模型。对于拥有密集观测网络和独特水文制度的国家,投资于国家数据集和模型可以提高深度学习模型预测的准确性,从而提高对极端气候的抵御能力和当地水资源管理决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书