{"title":"A Mechanistic Approach Accounting for Progressive Soil Surface Sealing in Interrill Erosion Modeling","authors":"Songbai Wu,Li Chen,Ninglian Wang,Tal Svoray,Shmuel Assouline","doi":"10.1029/2025wr042476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Raindrop‐induced soil surface sealing alters infiltration, runoff, and sediment detachment, yet most erosion models fail to capture its dynamic impacts on interrill processes at event scales. Conceptually informed by the process‐based approach of Water Erosion Prediction Project, we develop a modeling framework that couples seal formation, two‐layer infiltration, kinematic wave overland flow, and interrill erosion. The framework integrates slope gradient and rainfall intensity into the temporal evolution of interrill erodibility, enabling explicit representation of sealing dynamics. Laboratory data of Assouline and Ben‐Hur (2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2006.02.005 ) covering rainfall intensities of 24–60 mm hr −1 and slopes of 5%–25%, were used for evaluation. The model reproduced observed sediment loads with normalized RMSE of 14%–20% and Nash‐Sutcliffe efficiencies of 0.70–0.89, outperforming the version in which the progressive sealing effect is omitted. Results highlight two competing sealing effects: reduced interrill erodibility suppresses detachment, while increased rainfall excess enhances transport capacity. Their relative importance depends on slope: increasing rainfall excess dominates erosion on gentle slopes, whereas interrill erodibility reduction controls erosion on steep slopes. The model also reveals dynamic regime shifts from transport‐limited to transitional or detachment‐limited during sealing. Comparisons show that neglecting seal formation can substantially underestimate sediment loads, whereas assuming instantaneous sealing overestimates erosion by 37%–71% on gentle slopes and underestimates it by 2%–7% on steep slopes. By resolving slope‐ and rainfall‐dependent sealing dynamics, the proposed model provides a physically based framework for event‐scale interrill erosion prediction, improving the reliability of rainfall‐runoff‐erosion assessments in erosion‐prone landscapes.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"687 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2025wr042476","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Raindrop‐induced soil surface sealing alters infiltration, runoff, and sediment detachment, yet most erosion models fail to capture its dynamic impacts on interrill processes at event scales. Conceptually informed by the process‐based approach of Water Erosion Prediction Project, we develop a modeling framework that couples seal formation, two‐layer infiltration, kinematic wave overland flow, and interrill erosion. The framework integrates slope gradient and rainfall intensity into the temporal evolution of interrill erodibility, enabling explicit representation of sealing dynamics. Laboratory data of Assouline and Ben‐Hur (2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2006.02.005 ) covering rainfall intensities of 24–60 mm hr −1 and slopes of 5%–25%, were used for evaluation. The model reproduced observed sediment loads with normalized RMSE of 14%–20% and Nash‐Sutcliffe efficiencies of 0.70–0.89, outperforming the version in which the progressive sealing effect is omitted. Results highlight two competing sealing effects: reduced interrill erodibility suppresses detachment, while increased rainfall excess enhances transport capacity. Their relative importance depends on slope: increasing rainfall excess dominates erosion on gentle slopes, whereas interrill erodibility reduction controls erosion on steep slopes. The model also reveals dynamic regime shifts from transport‐limited to transitional or detachment‐limited during sealing. Comparisons show that neglecting seal formation can substantially underestimate sediment loads, whereas assuming instantaneous sealing overestimates erosion by 37%–71% on gentle slopes and underestimates it by 2%–7% on steep slopes. By resolving slope‐ and rainfall‐dependent sealing dynamics, the proposed model provides a physically based framework for event‐scale interrill erosion prediction, improving the reliability of rainfall‐runoff‐erosion assessments in erosion‐prone landscapes.
降雨引起的土壤表面密封改变了入渗、径流和沉积物分离,但大多数侵蚀模型未能在事件尺度上捕获其对沟间过程的动态影响。从概念上讲,通过基于过程的水侵蚀预测项目方法,我们开发了一个耦合密封形成、两层渗透、运动波陆上流和细沟间侵蚀的建模框架。该框架将坡度和降雨强度整合到细沟间可蚀性的时间演变中,从而明确表示密封动力学。阿苏林和本胡尔的实验室数据(2006,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2006.02.005)覆盖了24-60 mm hr−1的降雨强度和5%-25%的坡度,用于评估。该模型再现了观测到的泥沙荷载,归一化RMSE为14%-20%,Nash - Sutcliffe效率为0.70-0.89,优于忽略渐进式密封效应的模型。研究结果强调了两种相互竞争的密封效果:降低了细沟间的可蚀性,抑制了分离,而增加的降雨量过剩则增强了运输能力。它们的相对重要性取决于坡度:在缓坡上,增加的过量降雨控制着侵蚀,而在陡坡上,细沟间可蚀性的降低控制着侵蚀。该模型还揭示了密封过程中从运输限制到过渡或分离限制的动态变化。对比表明,忽略密封层会大大低估沉积物负荷,而假设瞬时密封对缓坡侵蚀的高估幅度为37%-71%,对陡坡侵蚀的低估幅度为2%-7%。通过解析坡度和降雨依赖的密封动力学,该模型为事件尺度的细沟侵蚀预测提供了一个基于物理的框架,提高了易受侵蚀景观中降雨-径流-侵蚀评估的可靠性。
期刊介绍:
Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.