The effect of train-test data splitting ratio on yield prediction from multispectral UAV imagery: effective reduction of training ratio with algorithm selection for single- and multi-date models

IF 7.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Lukas Prey,Patrick Ole Noack
{"title":"The effect of train-test data splitting ratio on yield prediction from multispectral UAV imagery: effective reduction of training ratio with algorithm selection for single- and multi-date models","authors":"Lukas Prey,Patrick Ole Noack","doi":"10.1007/s11119-026-10464-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Context Optimizing the ratio of data required for training spectral grain yield (GY) prediction models is critical for efficient sampling of reference data, but has been rarely addressed so far. Given the high costs for collecting ground truth data, standard data splitting ratios which use the majority of the data for training and the rest for testing the models should be minimized, but in turn may affect prediction accuracy. Methods Therefore, this study evaluated 11 different train-test data splitting ratios (TSR), ranging from using 5% to 95% of the data for training, and the remaining portion as test sets. Models with six different machine learning algorithms were compared in winter wheat breeding trials conducted with each several thousand plots in two locations in Germany over a period of four years. The input data consisted of the (unmanned aerial vehicle) UAV-based NDRE index data from individual measurements dates as well as multi-date combinations. Results The results indicate that GY prediction remained relatively stable when decreasing TSR to about 0.30. Conversely, multi-date models tended to benefit more from higher TSR than single-date models. Support vector machine and random forest algorithms demonstrated relative advantage both for higher TSR and multi-date models, whereas partial least squares and ridge regression were the best algorithms for lowest TSR-values. Furthermore, analysis via repeated data splitting revealed minimum R² variability at a TSR of 0.30, but substantially increased variance at higher TSR values. Conclusions It is concluded that decreasing TSR while considering algorithm selection can potentially reduce costs without compromising prediction accuracy, therefore making spectral phenotyping methods more accessible and ready-to-use, whereas the absolute number of data points requires additional examination.","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-026-10464-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Context Optimizing the ratio of data required for training spectral grain yield (GY) prediction models is critical for efficient sampling of reference data, but has been rarely addressed so far. Given the high costs for collecting ground truth data, standard data splitting ratios which use the majority of the data for training and the rest for testing the models should be minimized, but in turn may affect prediction accuracy. Methods Therefore, this study evaluated 11 different train-test data splitting ratios (TSR), ranging from using 5% to 95% of the data for training, and the remaining portion as test sets. Models with six different machine learning algorithms were compared in winter wheat breeding trials conducted with each several thousand plots in two locations in Germany over a period of four years. The input data consisted of the (unmanned aerial vehicle) UAV-based NDRE index data from individual measurements dates as well as multi-date combinations. Results The results indicate that GY prediction remained relatively stable when decreasing TSR to about 0.30. Conversely, multi-date models tended to benefit more from higher TSR than single-date models. Support vector machine and random forest algorithms demonstrated relative advantage both for higher TSR and multi-date models, whereas partial least squares and ridge regression were the best algorithms for lowest TSR-values. Furthermore, analysis via repeated data splitting revealed minimum R² variability at a TSR of 0.30, but substantially increased variance at higher TSR values. Conclusions It is concluded that decreasing TSR while considering algorithm selection can potentially reduce costs without compromising prediction accuracy, therefore making spectral phenotyping methods more accessible and ready-to-use, whereas the absolute number of data points requires additional examination.
训练-测试数据分割率对多光谱无人机图像产量预测的影响:通过算法选择有效降低单数据和多数据模型的训练率
优化训练谱产率(GY)预测模型所需的数据比例是有效采样参考数据的关键,但迄今为止很少得到解决。考虑到收集地面真实数据的高成本,应该尽量减少使用大部分数据进行训练,其余数据用于测试模型的标准数据分割比率,但这反过来可能会影响预测精度。因此,本研究评估了11种不同的训练-测试数据分割比率(TSR),范围从5%到95%的数据用于训练,其余部分作为测试集。采用六种不同机器学习算法的模型在德国的两个地方进行了为期四年的数千块土地的冬小麦育种试验中进行了比较。输入数据包括(无人机)基于无人机的NDRE指数数据,这些数据来自单个测量日期以及多日期组合。结果表明,当TSR降至0.30左右时,GY预测结果相对稳定。相反,多日期模型往往比单日期模型从更高的TSR中获益更多。支持向量机算法和随机森林算法在高TSR和多数据模型上均表现出相对优势,而偏最小二乘算法和脊回归算法在低TSR模型上表现最佳。此外,通过重复数据分割分析发现,在TSR为0.30时,R²变异性最小,但在TSR值较高时,方差显著增加。综上所述,在考虑算法选择的同时降低TSR可以在不影响预测精度的情况下潜在地降低成本,从而使光谱表型方法更容易获得和使用,而数据点的绝对数量需要额外的检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Precision Agriculture
Precision Agriculture 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
103
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming. There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to: Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc. Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc. Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc. Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc. Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc. Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书