Identification, quantification, and management of human health risks from long‐distance pesticide transport

IF 4.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Yabi Huang,Zijian Li,Peter Fantke
{"title":"Identification, quantification, and management of human health risks from long‐distance pesticide transport","authors":"Yabi Huang,Zijian Li,Peter Fantke","doi":"10.1002/ps.71372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract BACKGROUND Human health risks associated with long‐distance pesticide transport are increasingly recognized but remain insufficiently assessed. Traditional assessments have focused on local applications, whereas growing evidence shows that pesticides can travel across large regions through air, water systems, and trade networks, leading to human exposure far from the original pesticide sources. In response, this study aims to propose an integrated conceptual framework that can identify key transport pathways, clarify long‐distance risk, and explore methods for quantifying exposure across interconnected systems. RESULTS We identify four major groups of pathways through which long‐distance pesticide exposure can occur, including environmental transport, water distribution systems, food trade, and non‐food commodity trade. Based on these pathways, we propose a modular source‐to‐receptor assessment framework that links three main components: pesticide sources, transport, redistribution, and transformation processes, and receptor‐level exposure and risk. The framework can integrate pathway‐specific environmental fate and distribution, hydrological, infrastructure, crop, trade, and exposure models. We further propose a three‐tier implementation strategy: screening‐level prioritization, spatiotemporal modeling, and integrated receptor‐level assessment. Key considerations include source attribution, transformation products, uncertainty, and aggregate (across sources per pesticide) and cumulative (across pesticides) exposure. CONCLUSION Long‐distance pesticide transport should be considered as a system‐level exposure problem rather than as a series of isolated pathways. The proposed framework provides an initial basis for linking pesticide use with geographically displaced human exposure and may support future development of more integrated monitoring, assessment, and risk management approaches. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.","PeriodicalId":218,"journal":{"name":"Pest Management Science","volume":"409 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pest Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.71372","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Human health risks associated with long‐distance pesticide transport are increasingly recognized but remain insufficiently assessed. Traditional assessments have focused on local applications, whereas growing evidence shows that pesticides can travel across large regions through air, water systems, and trade networks, leading to human exposure far from the original pesticide sources. In response, this study aims to propose an integrated conceptual framework that can identify key transport pathways, clarify long‐distance risk, and explore methods for quantifying exposure across interconnected systems. RESULTS We identify four major groups of pathways through which long‐distance pesticide exposure can occur, including environmental transport, water distribution systems, food trade, and non‐food commodity trade. Based on these pathways, we propose a modular source‐to‐receptor assessment framework that links three main components: pesticide sources, transport, redistribution, and transformation processes, and receptor‐level exposure and risk. The framework can integrate pathway‐specific environmental fate and distribution, hydrological, infrastructure, crop, trade, and exposure models. We further propose a three‐tier implementation strategy: screening‐level prioritization, spatiotemporal modeling, and integrated receptor‐level assessment. Key considerations include source attribution, transformation products, uncertainty, and aggregate (across sources per pesticide) and cumulative (across pesticides) exposure. CONCLUSION Long‐distance pesticide transport should be considered as a system‐level exposure problem rather than as a series of isolated pathways. The proposed framework provides an initial basis for linking pesticide use with geographically displaced human exposure and may support future development of more integrated monitoring, assessment, and risk management approaches. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.
农药长途运输对人类健康风险的识别、量化和管理
背景:农药长途运输对人类健康的危害日益被认识到,但评估仍不够充分。传统的评估侧重于当地的应用,而越来越多的证据表明,农药可以通过空气、水系统和贸易网络在大片地区传播,导致人类接触到远离原始农药来源的地方。为此,本研究旨在提出一个综合的概念框架,该框架可以识别关键的运输途径,澄清长距离风险,并探索量化相互关联系统间暴露的方法。结果:我们确定了长距离农药暴露可能发生的四种主要途径,包括环境运输、配水系统、食品贸易和非食品商品贸易。基于这些途径,我们提出了一个模块化的源-受体评估框架,该框架将三个主要组成部分联系起来:农药来源、运输、再分配和转化过程,以及受体水平的暴露和风险。该框架可以整合特定路径的环境命运和分布、水文、基础设施、作物、贸易和暴露模型。我们进一步提出了三层实施策略:筛选级优先级,时空建模和综合受体水平评估。关键的考虑因素包括来源归属、转化产物、不确定性,以及总体(跨每种农药的来源)和累积(跨农药)暴露。结论长距离农药运输应被视为一个系统水平的暴露问题,而不是一系列孤立的途径。拟议的框架为将农药使用与地理位置偏移的人类暴露联系起来提供了初步基础,并可能支持未来发展更综合的监测、评估和风险管理方法。©2026化学工业协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pest Management Science
Pest Management Science 农林科学-昆虫学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
9.80%
发文量
553
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Pest Management Science is the international journal of research and development in crop protection and pest control. Since its launch in 1970, the journal has become the premier forum for papers on the discovery, application, and impact on the environment of products and strategies designed for pest management. Published for SCI by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书