Presence ≠ problem: pathogenicity decoupled from active pathogen abundance

IF 4.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Rachel Clarkson,Kim Zitnick-Anderson,Miranda Vanderhyde,Sage M. Longtin,Kirsten Butcher
{"title":"Presence ≠ problem: pathogenicity decoupled from active pathogen abundance","authors":"Rachel Clarkson,Kim Zitnick-Anderson,Miranda Vanderhyde,Sage M. Longtin,Kirsten Butcher","doi":"10.1007/s11104-026-09150-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background and aims Pre-season detection of common scab, caused by Streptomyces scabies , is essential for mitigating economic losses before tuber infection occurs. Current detection methods rely on DNA-based assays, which cannot distinguish between viable and dead S. scabies . RNA-based assays may provide a more reliable indication of pathogen activity in soil. This experiment evaluated whether RNA-based detection improves prediction of disease severity. Methods In a growth chamber experiment, soils were artificially infested with S. scabies and seeded with radish. Soil collected prior to radish transplant and following harvest was extracted for both DNA and RNA. Both qPCR and rt-qPCR were used to quantify: i ) the constitutively expressed 16S rRNA, and ii ) the facultatively expressed txtAB , which facilitates tuber infection. Disease severity was evaluated against pre-season and post-harvest gene abundances. Results A clear gradient in S. scabies density was detected using genomic txtAB and genomic and transcribed 16S rRNA abundances. Transcribed txtAB was not detected. Despite a clear gradient in S. scabies , no assay reliably predicted disease severity. Conclusions Our results suggest two fundamental constraints at the intersection of plant pathology and soil science: i ) the success of RNA-based assays for detecting pathogen activity is constrained by gene copy number and sampling time, especially when virulence factors are facultatively expressed, and ii ) detection of pathogens, even in a metabolically active state, does not necessarily provide sufficient information to predict virulence expression, decoupling active pathogen presence from disease severity.","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09150-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Pre-season detection of common scab, caused by Streptomyces scabies , is essential for mitigating economic losses before tuber infection occurs. Current detection methods rely on DNA-based assays, which cannot distinguish between viable and dead S. scabies . RNA-based assays may provide a more reliable indication of pathogen activity in soil. This experiment evaluated whether RNA-based detection improves prediction of disease severity. Methods In a growth chamber experiment, soils were artificially infested with S. scabies and seeded with radish. Soil collected prior to radish transplant and following harvest was extracted for both DNA and RNA. Both qPCR and rt-qPCR were used to quantify: i ) the constitutively expressed 16S rRNA, and ii ) the facultatively expressed txtAB , which facilitates tuber infection. Disease severity was evaluated against pre-season and post-harvest gene abundances. Results A clear gradient in S. scabies density was detected using genomic txtAB and genomic and transcribed 16S rRNA abundances. Transcribed txtAB was not detected. Despite a clear gradient in S. scabies , no assay reliably predicted disease severity. Conclusions Our results suggest two fundamental constraints at the intersection of plant pathology and soil science: i ) the success of RNA-based assays for detecting pathogen activity is constrained by gene copy number and sampling time, especially when virulence factors are facultatively expressed, and ii ) detection of pathogens, even in a metabolically active state, does not necessarily provide sufficient information to predict virulence expression, decoupling active pathogen presence from disease severity.
存在≠问题:致病性与活性病原体丰度脱钩
背景与目的在块茎感染发生前,对由疥疮链霉菌引起的常见结痂进行季前检测,对于减轻经济损失至关重要。目前的检测方法依赖于基于dna的分析,不能区分活的和死的疥疮。基于rna的检测可以提供土壤中病原体活性的更可靠的指示。本实验评估基于rna的检测是否能提高疾病严重程度的预测。方法采用生长室法,在土壤中人工感染疥疮菌,并在土壤中播种萝卜。萝卜移植前和收获后收集的土壤提取DNA和RNA。qPCR和rt-qPCR均用于定量:i)组成性表达的16S rRNA, ii)兼性表达的txtAB,促进块茎感染。根据季前和收获后的基因丰度评估疾病严重程度。结果利用基因组txtAB、基因组和转录16S rRNA丰度检测到疥疮密度有明显的梯度。未检测到转录的txtAB。尽管在疥疮中有明显的梯度,但没有一种分析方法能可靠地预测疾病的严重程度。我们的研究结果表明,植物病理学和土壤科学交叉的两个基本限制:i)基于rna的检测病原体活性的方法的成功与否受到基因拷贝数和采样时间的限制,特别是当毒力因子同时表达时;ii)即使在代谢活跃状态下检测病原体,也不一定提供足够的信息来预测毒力表达,将活性病原体的存在与疾病严重程度脱钩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书