Response of soil health indicators to tillage is associated with soil mineralogy in maize-based agroecosystems across the U.S

IF 7.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Geoderma Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.118073
Rosa E. Lopez, Jordon Wade, Matthew H.H. Fischel, Michel A. Cavigelli, Jude E. Maul, Hanna Poffenbarger, Andrea Jilling, Steve Culman, María B. Villamil, Ezra Aberle, Morgan P. Davis, Andrew J. Margenot
{"title":"Response of soil health indicators to tillage is associated with soil mineralogy in maize-based agroecosystems across the U.S","authors":"Rosa E. Lopez,&nbsp;Jordon Wade,&nbsp;Matthew H.H. Fischel,&nbsp;Michel A. Cavigelli,&nbsp;Jude E. Maul,&nbsp;Hanna Poffenbarger,&nbsp;Andrea Jilling,&nbsp;Steve Culman,&nbsp;María B. Villamil,&nbsp;Ezra Aberle,&nbsp;Morgan P. Davis,&nbsp;Andrew J. Margenot","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.118073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The sensitivity of soil health indicators to tillage can be strongly influenced by agroecosystem context, leading to inconsistent responses of soil health indicators to tillage practices across sites. Using long-term maize-based tillage experiments encompassing a gradient of soil mineralogy across six U.S. states, we quantified differences in soil organic carbon (SOC) and additional soil health indicators of microbial biomass C (MBC) and N (MBN), mineralizable C (C<sub>min</sub>), permanganate-oxidizable “carbon” (POXC), autoclave-extractable “protein” (ACE protein) and the activities of β-glucosidase (BG), <em>N</em>-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), protease (PRO), phosphomonoesterase (PME) and arylsulfatase (SUL) between no-tillage and conventional (chisel or moldboard) tillage. To explain differences in soil health indicator sensitivity to tillage, we assessed (1) associations between SOC and soil health indicator inter- and intra-site responses to tillage, and (2) associations between mineralogy and soil health indicator responses to tillage on a soil versus SOC basis. The responses of soil health indicators to tillage were generally lower in magnitude when expressed on a SOC basis relative to a soil mass basis. However, indicator responses to tillage increased concomitantly with SOC response (1:1) across sites, except for (i) NAG activity, which was twice as sensitive to tillage as SOC (2:1), and (ii) POXC, which was half as sensitive to tillage as SOC (1:2). Within sites, the responses of soil health indicators to tillage were generally unaffected by SOC response. Metrics of reactive Fe and Al phases were generally the strongest predictors of SOC and soil health indicator responses to tillage, likely due to enhanced organomineral associations by these phases relative to other minerals. Our findings indicate that soil mineralogy can be used to further interpret the context dependency of the effects of tillage practices and potentially additional management practices on soil health and SOC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"474 ","pages":"Article 118073"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706126004015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sensitivity of soil health indicators to tillage can be strongly influenced by agroecosystem context, leading to inconsistent responses of soil health indicators to tillage practices across sites. Using long-term maize-based tillage experiments encompassing a gradient of soil mineralogy across six U.S. states, we quantified differences in soil organic carbon (SOC) and additional soil health indicators of microbial biomass C (MBC) and N (MBN), mineralizable C (Cmin), permanganate-oxidizable “carbon” (POXC), autoclave-extractable “protein” (ACE protein) and the activities of β-glucosidase (BG), N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), protease (PRO), phosphomonoesterase (PME) and arylsulfatase (SUL) between no-tillage and conventional (chisel or moldboard) tillage. To explain differences in soil health indicator sensitivity to tillage, we assessed (1) associations between SOC and soil health indicator inter- and intra-site responses to tillage, and (2) associations between mineralogy and soil health indicator responses to tillage on a soil versus SOC basis. The responses of soil health indicators to tillage were generally lower in magnitude when expressed on a SOC basis relative to a soil mass basis. However, indicator responses to tillage increased concomitantly with SOC response (1:1) across sites, except for (i) NAG activity, which was twice as sensitive to tillage as SOC (2:1), and (ii) POXC, which was half as sensitive to tillage as SOC (1:2). Within sites, the responses of soil health indicators to tillage were generally unaffected by SOC response. Metrics of reactive Fe and Al phases were generally the strongest predictors of SOC and soil health indicator responses to tillage, likely due to enhanced organomineral associations by these phases relative to other minerals. Our findings indicate that soil mineralogy can be used to further interpret the context dependency of the effects of tillage practices and potentially additional management practices on soil health and SOC.
美国玉米农业生态系统土壤健康指标对耕作的响应与土壤矿物学有关
土壤健康指标对耕作方式的敏感性受到农业生态系统背景的强烈影响,导致土壤健康指标对不同地点耕作方式的响应不一致。利用美国6个州土壤矿物学梯度的长期玉米耕作试验,我们量化了土壤有机碳(SOC)和其他土壤健康指标的差异,包括微生物生物量C (MBC)和N (MBN)、矿化C (Cmin)、高锰酸盐可氧化“碳”(POXC)、蒸压可提取“蛋白质”(ACE蛋白)以及β-葡萄糖苷酶(BG)、N-乙酰-β- d -葡萄糖苷酶(NAG)、蛋白酶(PRO)、酶(g)和酶(g)的活性。免耕与常规(凿子或板子)耕作之间磷酸单酯酶(PME)和芳基硫酸盐酶(SUL)的差异。为了解释土壤健康指标对耕作敏感性的差异,我们评估了(1)土壤有机碳和土壤健康指标对耕作的响应之间的相关性,以及(2)土壤与有机碳基础上矿物学和土壤健康指标对耕作的响应之间的相关性。土壤健康指标对耕作的响应在土壤有机碳的基础上普遍低于土壤质量的基础上。然而,除了NAG活性对耕作的敏感性是SOC的两倍(2:1)和POXC对耕作的敏感性是SOC的一半(1:2)外,各试验点对耕作的指标响应随SOC响应的增加而增加(1:1)。在样地内,土壤健康指标对耕作的响应一般不受有机碳响应的影响。活性Fe和Al相的指标通常是土壤有机碳和土壤健康指标对耕作反应的最强预测指标,可能是由于这些相相对于其他矿物质增强了有机有机质的关联。我们的研究结果表明,土壤矿物学可以用来进一步解释耕作方式和潜在的额外管理措施对土壤健康和有机碳影响的环境依赖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书