Deep soil desiccation patterns and ecohydrological feedbacks of vegetation re-establishment in desiccated soils on the Loess Plateau

IF 7.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Geoderma Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-02 DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.118070
Jing Lu, Yuhong Zhou, Xing Wang, Kemeng Zhang, Zhiyong Gao
{"title":"Deep soil desiccation patterns and ecohydrological feedbacks of vegetation re-establishment in desiccated soils on the Loess Plateau","authors":"Jing Lu,&nbsp;Yuhong Zhou,&nbsp;Xing Wang,&nbsp;Kemeng Zhang,&nbsp;Zhiyong Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.118070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Deep soil water (&gt;200 cm) is a critical water source for sustaining vegetation productivity and long term ecosystem stability in water limited regions. However, under the large scale “Grain for Green” program on the Loess Plateau, deep soil water patterns across different vegetation restoration types remain insufficiently understood. The ecohydrological feedbacks associated with vegetation reestablishment in desiccated soils are also unclear. This study integrated 6,516 observations from 176 sites across the Loess Plateau. We systematically assessed soil water conditions and desiccation characteristics within 0–1000 cm soil profiles under rainfed cropland, natural grassland, artificial grassland, orchards, and ecological forests (including tree and shrub plantations). In addition, a 5-year replanting experiment was conducted on soils with pre-existing deep desiccation (&gt;10 m). The experiment compared the coupled responses of soil water dynamics and plant growth under different vegetation configurations. The results show that deep soil desiccation is widespread during vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau. Rainfed orchards, ecological forests, and artificial grasslands developed persistent dry layers 3–5 m thick. The most severe desiccation occurred in ecological forests. Following replanting on desiccated soils, deep rooted species (<em>Robinia pseudoacacia</em> L., <em>Caragana korshinskii</em> Kom., and <em>Medicago sativa</em> L.) continuously depleted middle and deep soil water because of their high water consumption. They also preferentially utilized infiltrated rainfall, thereby limiting deep recharge and maintaining or exacerbating soil desiccation. Meanwhile, these species exhibited a rainfall-pulse-driven adaptive growth strategy that supported survival and biomass accumulation. In contrast, shallow rooted vegetation (<em>Poa annua</em> L.) and bare land showed limited utilization of deep soil water. Their low water consumption facilitated downward rainfall infiltration. This promoted the gradual rewetting of desiccated layers from shallow to deeper soil depths, with a maximum recovery depth of 450 cm within five years. Deep rooted vegetation dominated the rainfall responsive water use pattern. In contrast, shallow rooted vegetation or bare land was associated with a water conserving rewetting pattern. The divergence between these patterns reveals a coupled mechanism among soil water storage, rainfall input, and vegetation water use strategies. This finding provides a theoretical basis for vegetation restoration under water limited conditions on the Loess Plateau and in similar dryland regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"474 ","pages":"Article 118070"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706126003988","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep soil water (>200 cm) is a critical water source for sustaining vegetation productivity and long term ecosystem stability in water limited regions. However, under the large scale “Grain for Green” program on the Loess Plateau, deep soil water patterns across different vegetation restoration types remain insufficiently understood. The ecohydrological feedbacks associated with vegetation reestablishment in desiccated soils are also unclear. This study integrated 6,516 observations from 176 sites across the Loess Plateau. We systematically assessed soil water conditions and desiccation characteristics within 0–1000 cm soil profiles under rainfed cropland, natural grassland, artificial grassland, orchards, and ecological forests (including tree and shrub plantations). In addition, a 5-year replanting experiment was conducted on soils with pre-existing deep desiccation (>10 m). The experiment compared the coupled responses of soil water dynamics and plant growth under different vegetation configurations. The results show that deep soil desiccation is widespread during vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau. Rainfed orchards, ecological forests, and artificial grasslands developed persistent dry layers 3–5 m thick. The most severe desiccation occurred in ecological forests. Following replanting on desiccated soils, deep rooted species (Robinia pseudoacacia L., Caragana korshinskii Kom., and Medicago sativa L.) continuously depleted middle and deep soil water because of their high water consumption. They also preferentially utilized infiltrated rainfall, thereby limiting deep recharge and maintaining or exacerbating soil desiccation. Meanwhile, these species exhibited a rainfall-pulse-driven adaptive growth strategy that supported survival and biomass accumulation. In contrast, shallow rooted vegetation (Poa annua L.) and bare land showed limited utilization of deep soil water. Their low water consumption facilitated downward rainfall infiltration. This promoted the gradual rewetting of desiccated layers from shallow to deeper soil depths, with a maximum recovery depth of 450 cm within five years. Deep rooted vegetation dominated the rainfall responsive water use pattern. In contrast, shallow rooted vegetation or bare land was associated with a water conserving rewetting pattern. The divergence between these patterns reveals a coupled mechanism among soil water storage, rainfall input, and vegetation water use strategies. This finding provides a theoretical basis for vegetation restoration under water limited conditions on the Loess Plateau and in similar dryland regions.
黄土高原干旱区深层土壤干旱化模式及植被重建的生态水文反馈
深层土壤水(>200 cm)是维持缺水地区植被生产力和生态系统长期稳定的重要水源。然而,在黄土高原大规模“退耕还林”工程下,不同植被恢复类型的深层土壤水分格局尚不清楚。与干旱化土壤植被重建相关的生态水文反馈也不清楚。该研究综合了黄土高原176个地点的6516个观测结果。系统评价了旱作农田、天然草地、人工草地、果园和生态林(包括乔灌林)0 ~ 1000 cm土壤剖面土壤水分状况和干旱化特征。此外,在已存在深度干燥(>10 m)的土壤上进行了为期5年的补种试验。试验比较了不同植被配置下土壤水分动态与植物生长的耦合响应。结果表明,黄土高原植被恢复过程中土壤深度干旱化现象普遍存在。雨养果园、生态林和人工草地形成了3-5米厚的持续干旱层。最严重的干旱化发生在生态森林。在干燥土壤上补种后,深根树种(刺槐刺槐、柠条、柠条、柠条、柠条、柠条)。紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)因耗水量大而持续耗竭中深层土壤水分。它们还优先利用入渗降雨,从而限制了深层补给,维持或加剧了土壤干燥。同时,这些物种表现出降雨脉冲驱动的适应性生长策略,支持生存和生物量积累。浅根植被(Poa annua L.)和裸地对深层土壤水分利用有限。低耗水量有利于降雨向下入渗。这促进了干枯土层从浅层向深层逐渐复湿,5年内最大恢复深度可达450 cm。深根植被主导降雨响应型水分利用模式。相比之下,浅根植被或裸地与保水再湿润模式有关。这些模式之间的差异揭示了土壤水分储存、降雨输入和植被水分利用策略之间的耦合机制。这一发现为黄土高原及类似干旱区限水条件下植被恢复提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书