Synergy or crowding-out? How the superposition of mitigation and adaptation policies shapes firm green innovation in China

IF 10.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2026-10-14 Epub Date: 2026-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.149613
Ming Yuan, Ninger Lou, Kequan Huang, Ruochen Zeng, Shanshan Wang, Han Lin
{"title":"Synergy or crowding-out? How the superposition of mitigation and adaptation policies shapes firm green innovation in China","authors":"Ming Yuan,&nbsp;Ninger Lou,&nbsp;Kequan Huang,&nbsp;Ruochen Zeng,&nbsp;Shanshan Wang,&nbsp;Han Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.149613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate governance increasingly requires the simultaneous pursuit of mitigation and adaptation. However, whether their policy superposition promotes or constrains firm green innovation remains unclear. Drawing on Policy Mix Theory, this study applies a Double Machine Learning framework to analyze 11,012 firm-year observations of Chinese A-share listed firms (2005–2023), exploiting the overlapping implementation of the Low-Carbon City Pilot and the Climate-Resilient City Pilot. We find that the superposition of the two pilots generates policy synergy and significantly enhances firm green innovation (<em>β = 0.259, p &lt; 0.01</em>), with a stronger response for invention patents (<em>β = 0.319, p &lt; 0.01</em>) than for utility models. Mechanism analysis reveals that this dual-pilot superposition heightens managerial climate-risk attention (<em>β = 0.099, p &lt; 0.01</em>) and increases government environmental subsidies (<em>β = 1.300, p &lt; 0.05</em>). The synergy effect is concentrated among state-owned enterprises and financially unconstrained firms, is stronger in non-super-large cities and eastern regions, and is activated primarily when mitigation pressure is high but adaptation pressure is low. These heterogeneous responses across ownership types and regional conditions further suggest that the realization of such cross-objective policy synergies depends on firms’ absorptive capacity and the local institutional environment, factors largely overlooked in current policy-mix designs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"579 ","pages":"Article 149613"},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652626021542","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate governance increasingly requires the simultaneous pursuit of mitigation and adaptation. However, whether their policy superposition promotes or constrains firm green innovation remains unclear. Drawing on Policy Mix Theory, this study applies a Double Machine Learning framework to analyze 11,012 firm-year observations of Chinese A-share listed firms (2005–2023), exploiting the overlapping implementation of the Low-Carbon City Pilot and the Climate-Resilient City Pilot. We find that the superposition of the two pilots generates policy synergy and significantly enhances firm green innovation (β = 0.259, p < 0.01), with a stronger response for invention patents (β = 0.319, p < 0.01) than for utility models. Mechanism analysis reveals that this dual-pilot superposition heightens managerial climate-risk attention (β = 0.099, p < 0.01) and increases government environmental subsidies (β = 1.300, p < 0.05). The synergy effect is concentrated among state-owned enterprises and financially unconstrained firms, is stronger in non-super-large cities and eastern regions, and is activated primarily when mitigation pressure is high but adaptation pressure is low. These heterogeneous responses across ownership types and regional conditions further suggest that the realization of such cross-objective policy synergies depends on firms’ absorptive capacity and the local institutional environment, factors largely overlooked in current policy-mix designs.
协同还是挤出?减缓和适应政策的叠加如何塑造中国企业的绿色创新
气候治理越来越需要同时追求减缓和适应。然而,它们的政策叠加是促进还是制约企业的绿色创新尚不清楚。本研究基于政策组合理论,运用双机器学习框架分析了中国a股上市公司(2005-2023年)的11012家公司年度观察结果,探讨了低碳城市试点和气候适应型城市试点的重叠实施。我们发现,两个试点的叠加产生了政策协同效应,显著促进了企业绿色创新(β = 0.259, p <; 0.01),其中对发明专利的响应(β = 0.319, p <; 0.01)强于对实用新型的响应。机制分析表明,这种双试点叠加提高了管理者对气候风险的关注(β = 0.099, p <; 0.01),增加了政府的环境补贴(β = 1.300, p <; 0.05)。协同效应主要集中在国有企业和资金不受约束的企业之间,在非特大城市和东部地区更为强烈,主要在缓解压力大而适应压力小的情况下被激活。这些不同所有制类型和区域条件的异质性反应进一步表明,这种跨目标政策协同效应的实现取决于企业的吸收能力和当地制度环境,而这些因素在当前的政策组合设计中很大程度上被忽视了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书