Effects of Organic Fertilizer Substitutions on Latex Yield and Soil Fertility in Hevea brasiliensis Plantations: A Case Study in Southern Philippines

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Oscar Jurado,Chengrong Chen,Johnvie B. Goloran,Adeflor Garcia,Honey B. Goloran,Xiangyu Liu,Neal W. Menzies,Yunying Fang
{"title":"Effects of Organic Fertilizer Substitutions on Latex Yield and Soil Fertility in\n \n Hevea brasiliensis\n \n Plantations: A Case Study in Southern Philippines","authors":"Oscar Jurado,Chengrong Chen,Johnvie B. Goloran,Adeflor Garcia,Honey B. Goloran,Xiangyu Liu,Neal W. Menzies,Yunying Fang","doi":"10.1002/ldr.70908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Rubber plantations can be a major source of income for small landholder farmers in rural communities across Southern Asia. However, rising fertilizer costs and progressive soil degradation threaten long‐term productivity and economic viability. To address this challenge, we conducted fertilizer trials across two field sites (Acrisols and Cambisols) in the southern Philippines, to evaluate the effects of reduced chemical fertilizer rates and organic fertilizer substitution on latex yield and soil fertility in mature rubber plantations. Five treatments (Control—no fertilizer, recommended chemical fertilizer rate (RR), 50% of RR, 50% of RR with vermicompost, and 50% of RR with K‐humate) were included. Results show that over the one‐year period, latex yield increased by 23%–56% at the Marcelina site, and by 18–32% at the Mabuhay site, compared to the respective unfertilized control. Across both sites, latex yield responses showed no statistical difference among full recommended (RR) and reduced fertilizer rates (50% RR, 50% RR + vermicompost, 50% + K‐humate). Key soil properties—including pH, EC, dissolved nitrogen (N), NH 4 + ‐N, NO 3 − ‐N, plant available phosphorus, dissolved organic carbon (C), soil organic C and total N—were not significantly affected by fertilizer application, but varied with sampling time. These results highlight that (1) in the short term (e.g., one‐year), the locally recommended fertilizer rates can be reduced without compromising soil fertility or yield, enabling farmers to cope with periods of financial hardship; (2) substituting chemical fertilizers with organic fertilizers, particularly vermicompost, has better potential to sustain latex yield in plantations with varying soil textures (clayey soils and silty clay loamy soils). The conclusion drawn from our study should be validated in a longer timeframe in future work. Our findings provide evidence to inform region‐specific fertilizer recommendations that enhance both sustainability and profitability for smallholder rubber farmers.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70908","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Rubber plantations can be a major source of income for small landholder farmers in rural communities across Southern Asia. However, rising fertilizer costs and progressive soil degradation threaten long‐term productivity and economic viability. To address this challenge, we conducted fertilizer trials across two field sites (Acrisols and Cambisols) in the southern Philippines, to evaluate the effects of reduced chemical fertilizer rates and organic fertilizer substitution on latex yield and soil fertility in mature rubber plantations. Five treatments (Control—no fertilizer, recommended chemical fertilizer rate (RR), 50% of RR, 50% of RR with vermicompost, and 50% of RR with K‐humate) were included. Results show that over the one‐year period, latex yield increased by 23%–56% at the Marcelina site, and by 18–32% at the Mabuhay site, compared to the respective unfertilized control. Across both sites, latex yield responses showed no statistical difference among full recommended (RR) and reduced fertilizer rates (50% RR, 50% RR + vermicompost, 50% + K‐humate). Key soil properties—including pH, EC, dissolved nitrogen (N), NH 4 + ‐N, NO 3 − ‐N, plant available phosphorus, dissolved organic carbon (C), soil organic C and total N—were not significantly affected by fertilizer application, but varied with sampling time. These results highlight that (1) in the short term (e.g., one‐year), the locally recommended fertilizer rates can be reduced without compromising soil fertility or yield, enabling farmers to cope with periods of financial hardship; (2) substituting chemical fertilizers with organic fertilizers, particularly vermicompost, has better potential to sustain latex yield in plantations with varying soil textures (clayey soils and silty clay loamy soils). The conclusion drawn from our study should be validated in a longer timeframe in future work. Our findings provide evidence to inform region‐specific fertilizer recommendations that enhance both sustainability and profitability for smallholder rubber farmers.
有机肥替代对巴西橡胶树人工林乳胶产量和土壤肥力的影响——以菲律宾南部为例
橡胶种植园可能是南亚农村社区小土地所有者的主要收入来源。然而,不断上升的肥料成本和不断恶化的土壤退化威胁着长期的生产力和经济可行性。为了应对这一挑战,我们在菲律宾南部的两个试验点(Acrisols和Cambisols)进行了肥料试验,以评估减少化肥用量和替代有机肥对成熟橡胶种植园乳胶产量和土壤肥力的影响。试验包括5个处理(对照不施肥、推荐化肥用量、50%化肥、50%蚯蚓堆肥和50%腐植酸钾)。结果表明,在1年的时间里,与未施肥的对照相比,Marcelina地块的乳胶产量提高了23% ~ 56%,Mabuhay地块的乳胶产量提高了18 ~ 32%。在两个试验点,乳胶产量响应在完全推荐(RR)和减少施肥量(50% RR、50% RR +蚯蚓堆肥、50% +腐植酸钾)之间没有统计学差异。土壤pH、EC、溶解态氮(N)、nh4 +‐N、no3−N、植物速效磷、溶解态有机碳(C)、土壤有机C和全氮等关键性状不受施肥影响,但随采样时间而变化。这些结果突出表明:(1)在短期内(例如一年),可以在不影响土壤肥力或产量的情况下降低当地推荐的肥料用量,使农民能够应对经济困难时期;(2)在不同土壤质地(粘土和粉质粘土壤土)的人工林中,以有机肥替代化肥,特别是蚯蚓堆肥,更有可能维持乳胶产量。从我们的研究中得出的结论应该在未来的工作中进行更长的时间框架的验证。我们的研究结果为特定区域的肥料建议提供了证据,从而提高了橡胶小农的可持续性和盈利能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书