Measuring consumer literacy about online fraud: effects on perceived financial risk and trust in online sellers

IF 7.2 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Gonzalo Luna Cortés
{"title":"Measuring consumer literacy about online fraud: effects on perceived financial risk and trust in online sellers","authors":"Gonzalo Luna Cortés","doi":"10.1108/intr-09-2025-1406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to develop and validate a scale to measure consumer literacy about online fraud (CLOF). While prior research has linked general education and financial literacy to fraud victimization, specific knowledge about online fraud remains underexplored. The CLOF scale addresses this gap by capturing consumers' awareness of fraud-related practices and protective behaviors. The study also examines the relationships between CLOF and perceived financial risk, trust in online sellers, and online buying intensity. Design/methodology/approach Following established scale development procedures, we conducted focus groups, item generation, Q-sort validation, and pilot testing. The CLOF scale was tested across three studies in the USA, Sweden, and the UK using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Reliability and validity were assessed through Cronbach's alpha, composite reliability, AVE, and discriminant validity. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test the hypotheses. Findings The CLOF scale comprises six dimensions (i.e. Knowledge about identity theft; Verification of the legitimacy of companies; Knowledge of how to report fraud; Checking red flags that prevent being a victim of online scams; Knowledge and use of tools that protect against scams; and Reading terms and conditions as a protection practice). The results also show that CLOF is negatively associated with perceived financial risk and positively associated with trust in online sellers. Originality/value Existing scales do not capture literacy about online fraud effectively, with inconsistent literacy–fraud relationships reported in the literature. Hence, there is an urgent need for effective measurement and associated behavior in this context. This research introduces the first validated scale specifically designed to measure consumer literacy about online fraud. The scale offers practical utility for scholars, policymakers, and practitioners aiming to enhance fraud prevention and consumer confidence in e-commerce.","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"221-239"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-09-2025-1406","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to develop and validate a scale to measure consumer literacy about online fraud (CLOF). While prior research has linked general education and financial literacy to fraud victimization, specific knowledge about online fraud remains underexplored. The CLOF scale addresses this gap by capturing consumers' awareness of fraud-related practices and protective behaviors. The study also examines the relationships between CLOF and perceived financial risk, trust in online sellers, and online buying intensity. Design/methodology/approach Following established scale development procedures, we conducted focus groups, item generation, Q-sort validation, and pilot testing. The CLOF scale was tested across three studies in the USA, Sweden, and the UK using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Reliability and validity were assessed through Cronbach's alpha, composite reliability, AVE, and discriminant validity. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test the hypotheses. Findings The CLOF scale comprises six dimensions (i.e. Knowledge about identity theft; Verification of the legitimacy of companies; Knowledge of how to report fraud; Checking red flags that prevent being a victim of online scams; Knowledge and use of tools that protect against scams; and Reading terms and conditions as a protection practice). The results also show that CLOF is negatively associated with perceived financial risk and positively associated with trust in online sellers. Originality/value Existing scales do not capture literacy about online fraud effectively, with inconsistent literacy–fraud relationships reported in the literature. Hence, there is an urgent need for effective measurement and associated behavior in this context. This research introduces the first validated scale specifically designed to measure consumer literacy about online fraud. The scale offers practical utility for scholars, policymakers, and practitioners aiming to enhance fraud prevention and consumer confidence in e-commerce.
衡量消费者对网络欺诈的认知:对感知金融风险和对网络卖家信任的影响
目的本研究旨在开发并验证一套测量消费者网络欺诈素养的量表。虽然之前的研究将普通教育和金融知识与欺诈受害者联系起来,但关于网络欺诈的具体知识仍未得到充分探索。CLOF量表通过捕捉消费者对欺诈相关做法和保护行为的意识来弥补这一差距。该研究还考察了CLOF与感知金融风险、对在线卖家的信任以及在线购买强度之间的关系。设计/方法/方法遵循既定的规模开发程序,我们进行了焦点小组、项目生成、q -分类验证和试点测试。CLOF量表在美国、瑞典和英国的三项研究中使用探索性和验证性因素分析进行了测试。信度和效度通过Cronbach’s alpha、复合信度、AVE和判别效度进行评估。采用结构方程模型(SEM)对假设进行检验。CLOF量表包括六个维度(即关于身份盗窃的知识;验证公司的合法性;了解如何报告欺诈;检查防止成为在线欺诈受害者的危险信号;了解和使用防止欺诈的工具;以及阅读条款和条件作为保护实践)。结果还表明,CLOF与感知财务风险负相关,与在线卖家信任正相关。原创性/价值现有的量表不能有效地捕捉在线欺诈的素养,文献中报道的素养与欺诈的关系不一致。因此,在这种情况下,迫切需要有效的测量和相关行为。本研究引入了第一个经过验证的量表,专门用于衡量消费者对网络欺诈的认知。该量表为旨在加强电子商务欺诈预防和消费者信心的学者、政策制定者和实践者提供了实用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internet Research
Internet Research 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.20%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This wide-ranging interdisciplinary journal looks at the social, ethical, economic and political implications of the internet. Recent issues have focused on online and mobile gaming, the sharing economy, and the dark side of social media.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书