No-tillage soil structure increases sugarcane root elongation under mechanical and hydric stresses in an Oxisol

IF 4.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Luiz Henrique Quecine Grande,Mariane Dias Macedo,John Kennedy dos Santos,Lucas Henrique Amaro da Silva,Anaila Amaral de Alencar,Murilo dos Santos Vianna,Denizart Bolonhezi,Moacir Tuzzin de Moraes
{"title":"No-tillage soil structure increases sugarcane root elongation under mechanical and hydric stresses in an Oxisol","authors":"Luiz Henrique Quecine Grande,Mariane Dias Macedo,John Kennedy dos Santos,Lucas Henrique Amaro da Silva,Anaila Amaral de Alencar,Murilo dos Santos Vianna,Denizart Bolonhezi,Moacir Tuzzin de Moraes","doi":"10.1007/s11104-026-09113-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background and aims Mechanical and hydric stresses limit root elongation, while preserved soil structure in no-tillage mitigates these effects. We quantified the effects of physical stress on sugarcane root elongation and the role of soil structure in mitigating them, providing experimentally based parameterisations for soil–root interaction via semi-empirical models. Methods Five levels of mechanical and hydric stress were established in soil samples from a long-term experiment under no-tillage (NT 31 ) and conventional tillage (CT 5 ). Repacked soil samples (T 0 ) were created to isolate the pore network effects in mitigating physical stress. Sugarcane seedlings were grown in each structural and physical stress condition, measuring the root elongation rate after 95 h. Semi-empirical models were developed using root elongation rate from each condition as a function of soil penetration resistance and degree of water saturation. Root growth was simulated for 45 days using RootBox model. Results Root elongation rate decreased by 30% in NT 31 and up to 84% in T 0 . The 3D Gaussian model explained 47% (CT 5 ), 71% (NT 31 ), and 78% (T 0 ) of the elongation variability. Under high soil moisture (95%) and penetration resistance (6.2 MPa), root elongation rate in NT 31 was 8.2 times higher than in T 0 and 1.8 times greater than in CT 5 . Simulations showed rooting depth was 2 times greater in NT 31 than in T 0 . Conclusion The semi-empirical models highlighted the key role of soil structure in mitigating physical stress on root elongation, as well as the potential of no-tillage to maintain and recover soil physical functions for root growth.","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09113-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Mechanical and hydric stresses limit root elongation, while preserved soil structure in no-tillage mitigates these effects. We quantified the effects of physical stress on sugarcane root elongation and the role of soil structure in mitigating them, providing experimentally based parameterisations for soil–root interaction via semi-empirical models. Methods Five levels of mechanical and hydric stress were established in soil samples from a long-term experiment under no-tillage (NT 31 ) and conventional tillage (CT 5 ). Repacked soil samples (T 0 ) were created to isolate the pore network effects in mitigating physical stress. Sugarcane seedlings were grown in each structural and physical stress condition, measuring the root elongation rate after 95 h. Semi-empirical models were developed using root elongation rate from each condition as a function of soil penetration resistance and degree of water saturation. Root growth was simulated for 45 days using RootBox model. Results Root elongation rate decreased by 30% in NT 31 and up to 84% in T 0 . The 3D Gaussian model explained 47% (CT 5 ), 71% (NT 31 ), and 78% (T 0 ) of the elongation variability. Under high soil moisture (95%) and penetration resistance (6.2 MPa), root elongation rate in NT 31 was 8.2 times higher than in T 0 and 1.8 times greater than in CT 5 . Simulations showed rooting depth was 2 times greater in NT 31 than in T 0 . Conclusion The semi-empirical models highlighted the key role of soil structure in mitigating physical stress on root elongation, as well as the potential of no-tillage to maintain and recover soil physical functions for root growth.
免耕土壤结构在机械和水分胁迫下增加甘蔗根系伸长
背景和目的机械和水分胁迫限制了根系伸长,而免耕保护的土壤结构减轻了这些影响。我们量化了物理胁迫对甘蔗根系伸长的影响以及土壤结构在缓解这些影响中的作用,通过半经验模型为土壤-根系相互作用提供了基于实验的参数化。方法对免耕(nt31)和常规耕作(ct5)土壤样品进行5个水平的机械和水胁迫试验。重新包装的土壤样品(t0)被创建,以隔离孔隙网络效应,减轻物理应力。将甘蔗幼苗在不同的结构和物理胁迫条件下生长,测定95 h后的根系伸长率。利用不同胁迫条件下根系伸长率与土壤渗透阻力和水分饱和度的函数关系建立半经验模型。采用RootBox模型模拟45 d的根系生长。结果根伸长率在NT 31中下降了30%,在t0中下降了84%。三维高斯模型解释了47% (CT 5)、71% (NT 31)和78% (t0)的伸长率变异。在高土壤含水量(95%)和高穿透阻力(6.2 MPa)条件下,NT 31的根系伸长率分别是t0的8.2倍和ct5的1.8倍。模拟结果表明,NT 31的生根深度是t0的2倍。结论半经验模型强调了土壤结构在缓解根系伸长物理胁迫中的关键作用,以及免耕对维持和恢复根系生长的土壤物理功能的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书