Elisabeth Winkler,Julia Stuhlreyer,Antonia Borcherding,Johannes Wessels,Regine Klinger
{"title":"Treatment Expectation across Open-Label Placebo and Pharmacological Contexts: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Chronic Low Back Pain","authors":"Elisabeth Winkler,Julia Stuhlreyer,Antonia Borcherding,Johannes Wessels,Regine Klinger","doi":"10.1159/pps/aemag014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Chronic low back pain (CLBP) markedly reduces quality of life and remains difficult to treat. Increasing opioid prescriptions highlight the need for effective innovative approaches. This randomized controlled trial aims to investigate whether social observational learning augments analgesic or open-label placebo treatment through treatment expectation modulation in CLBP patients. Methods One hundred thirty patients with CLBP were randomized into a 2 × 2 fully balanced placebo design plus a natural history (NH) control group. Patients received a 3-week treatment with novamine sulfone (analgesic) or open-label placebos (OLP), with follow-up at 3 months. Expectations were manipulated before treatment, using a positive social observational learning video (SoL) or a neutral control video (neutral). Pain intensity (numeric rating scale, NRS 0–10) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included treatment expectations and functional capacity. Results Pain intensity decreased significantly over time in all treatment groups (p < .001), with the smallest reduction in NH. Pain reduction in OLP + SoL and in analgesic + neutral was significantly greater than NH (p < .05). Expectation manipulation produced significant group differences in expected pain relief (p < .05). Higher expected pain relief predicted greater pain reduction after 3 weeks and 3 months (both p < .001). Functional capacity improved over time (p < .001) without consistent group differences. Conclusion Open-label placebos combined with social observational learning produced clinically meaningful analgesia that did not significantly differ from active medication. Treatment expectation represents a key mechanism underlying pain relief in CLBP and calls for further investigation.","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/pps/aemag014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction Chronic low back pain (CLBP) markedly reduces quality of life and remains difficult to treat. Increasing opioid prescriptions highlight the need for effective innovative approaches. This randomized controlled trial aims to investigate whether social observational learning augments analgesic or open-label placebo treatment through treatment expectation modulation in CLBP patients. Methods One hundred thirty patients with CLBP were randomized into a 2 × 2 fully balanced placebo design plus a natural history (NH) control group. Patients received a 3-week treatment with novamine sulfone (analgesic) or open-label placebos (OLP), with follow-up at 3 months. Expectations were manipulated before treatment, using a positive social observational learning video (SoL) or a neutral control video (neutral). Pain intensity (numeric rating scale, NRS 0–10) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included treatment expectations and functional capacity. Results Pain intensity decreased significantly over time in all treatment groups (p < .001), with the smallest reduction in NH. Pain reduction in OLP + SoL and in analgesic + neutral was significantly greater than NH (p < .05). Expectation manipulation produced significant group differences in expected pain relief (p < .05). Higher expected pain relief predicted greater pain reduction after 3 weeks and 3 months (both p < .001). Functional capacity improved over time (p < .001) without consistent group differences. Conclusion Open-label placebos combined with social observational learning produced clinically meaningful analgesia that did not significantly differ from active medication. Treatment expectation represents a key mechanism underlying pain relief in CLBP and calls for further investigation.
期刊介绍:
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics is a reputable journal that has been published since 1953. Over the years, it has gained recognition for its independence, originality, and methodological rigor. The journal has been at the forefront of research in psychosomatic medicine, psychotherapy research, and psychopharmacology, and has contributed to the development of new lines of research in these areas. It is now ranked among the world's most cited journals in the field.
As the official journal of the International College of Psychosomatic Medicine and the World Federation for Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics serves as a platform for discussing current and controversial issues and showcasing innovations in assessment and treatment. It offers a unique forum for cutting-edge thinking at the intersection of medical and behavioral sciences, catering to both practicing clinicians and researchers.
The journal is indexed in various databases and platforms such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Previews, Google Scholar, Academic Search, and Health Research Premium Collection, among others.