Roland von Känel,Monika Sadlonova,Christopher Celano,Nina Kupper,Paul Lodder,Jennifer A Sumner,Aju P. Pazhenkottil,Mary Princip,Noé Brasier,Jeffrey Birk
{"title":"The Future of Psychocardiology: From Psychosocial Risk to Mechanism-Based Care","authors":"Roland von Känel,Monika Sadlonova,Christopher Celano,Nina Kupper,Paul Lodder,Jennifer A Sumner,Aju P. Pazhenkottil,Mary Princip,Noé Brasier,Jeffrey Birk","doi":"10.1159/pps/aemag018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychocardiology has established psychosocial factors as contributors to cardiovascular risk, symptom burden, and prognosis. Although mechanistic research is growing, causal evidence remains inconsistent, while broad constructs, cross-sectional designs, and insufficiently specified pathways still limit clinical translation and treatment selection. The future lies in mechanism-based care that identifies modifiable biological, psychological, behavioral, and social processes linking psychosocial factors and cardiovascular disease bidirectionally. Mechanisms are temporally ordered causal processes through which changes in one factor produce changes in another; modifiable processes provide intervention targets. This evolution matters for psychosomatic medicine because psychocardiology offers a model for translating biopsychosocial theory into mechanism-based cardiovascular care. Advancing this framework requires mechanism-based phenotyping, temporally explicit research, repeated real-world assessment, and interventions testing target engagement and clinical benefit. Mechanism-based phenotyping identifies context-dependent profiles of interacting biological, psychological, behavioral, and social processes beyond diagnoses or symptom counts. Temporally explicit research distinguishes antecedents, triggers, maintaining factors, and consequences across disease stages and clinical contexts. Key opportunities include ambulatory and digital methods, experimental-medicine approaches testing causal hypotheses and target engagement, and integrated stepped-care models linking assessment to mechanism-informed treatment selection in cardiovascular disease-management pathways. Progress will depend on transdisciplinary training, clinical workflow integration, reimbursement structures, and equitable models of care.","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/pps/aemag018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Psychocardiology has established psychosocial factors as contributors to cardiovascular risk, symptom burden, and prognosis. Although mechanistic research is growing, causal evidence remains inconsistent, while broad constructs, cross-sectional designs, and insufficiently specified pathways still limit clinical translation and treatment selection. The future lies in mechanism-based care that identifies modifiable biological, psychological, behavioral, and social processes linking psychosocial factors and cardiovascular disease bidirectionally. Mechanisms are temporally ordered causal processes through which changes in one factor produce changes in another; modifiable processes provide intervention targets. This evolution matters for psychosomatic medicine because psychocardiology offers a model for translating biopsychosocial theory into mechanism-based cardiovascular care. Advancing this framework requires mechanism-based phenotyping, temporally explicit research, repeated real-world assessment, and interventions testing target engagement and clinical benefit. Mechanism-based phenotyping identifies context-dependent profiles of interacting biological, psychological, behavioral, and social processes beyond diagnoses or symptom counts. Temporally explicit research distinguishes antecedents, triggers, maintaining factors, and consequences across disease stages and clinical contexts. Key opportunities include ambulatory and digital methods, experimental-medicine approaches testing causal hypotheses and target engagement, and integrated stepped-care models linking assessment to mechanism-informed treatment selection in cardiovascular disease-management pathways. Progress will depend on transdisciplinary training, clinical workflow integration, reimbursement structures, and equitable models of care.
期刊介绍:
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics is a reputable journal that has been published since 1953. Over the years, it has gained recognition for its independence, originality, and methodological rigor. The journal has been at the forefront of research in psychosomatic medicine, psychotherapy research, and psychopharmacology, and has contributed to the development of new lines of research in these areas. It is now ranked among the world's most cited journals in the field.
As the official journal of the International College of Psychosomatic Medicine and the World Federation for Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics serves as a platform for discussing current and controversial issues and showcasing innovations in assessment and treatment. It offers a unique forum for cutting-edge thinking at the intersection of medical and behavioral sciences, catering to both practicing clinicians and researchers.
The journal is indexed in various databases and platforms such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Previews, Google Scholar, Academic Search, and Health Research Premium Collection, among others.