Is Dark Matter Really Matter?

Jun-Qian Jiang,Arman Shafieloo
{"title":"Is Dark Matter Really Matter?","authors":"Jun-Qian Jiang,Arman Shafieloo","doi":"10.3847/2041-8213/aeaa2a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the standard model of cosmology, it is assumed that dark matter is pressureless with equation of state w = 0 and dark energy has w  = −1. We test these assumptions jointly using DESI DR2 distance measurements, including the recent Ly α Alcock–Paczynski (AP) information, Dark Energy Survey (DES) supernovae, and two complementary cosmic microwave background (CMB) treatments. When constant w DM and w DE are varied together, we find w DM = 0.00096 8 − 0.000496 + 0.000501 and w DE = − 0.938 0 − 0.0262 + 0.0259 (68%). With an alternative CMB treatment that marginalizes over the lensing spectrum, the corresponding constraints are w DM = 0.00087 0 − 0.000410 + 0.000408 and w DE = − 0.935 3 − 0.0254 + 0.0258 . Both standard ΛCDM values are disfavored at approximately 2 σ in the joint extension. Neither parameter departs significantly from its standard value when only that parameter is varied. This behavior arises because late-time distances favor w DE  > −1, while maintaining the early-Universe physical matter density requires a compensating positive w DM , which changes the mapping to the matter density today. Allowing dynamical dark energy further highlights the complexity of the situation: phantom crossing for dark energy makes w DM  = 0 consistent with the data, whereas a positive w DM preference persists when crossing is forbidden. Interestingly, the Padé- w parameterization that provides a flexible description of a class of quintessence models (with no phantom crossing), along with w DM free, is even mildly favored over the phantom-crossing w 0 w a model according to both the best-fit χ 2 and the deviance information criterion (DIC) under both CMB treatments. One can conclude that the apparent preference for phantom crossing may instead reflect deviations in the dark-matter sector rather than dark-energy dynamics alone. With future high-redshift distance measurements, particularly improved Ly α observations, together with growth and lensing probes, these possibilities may be further clarified.","PeriodicalId":501814,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal Letters","volume":"11 1","pages":"L12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aeaa2a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the standard model of cosmology, it is assumed that dark matter is pressureless with equation of state w = 0 and dark energy has w  = −1. We test these assumptions jointly using DESI DR2 distance measurements, including the recent Ly α Alcock–Paczynski (AP) information, Dark Energy Survey (DES) supernovae, and two complementary cosmic microwave background (CMB) treatments. When constant w DM and w DE are varied together, we find w DM = 0.00096 8 − 0.000496 + 0.000501 and w DE = − 0.938 0 − 0.0262 + 0.0259 (68%). With an alternative CMB treatment that marginalizes over the lensing spectrum, the corresponding constraints are w DM = 0.00087 0 − 0.000410 + 0.000408 and w DE = − 0.935 3 − 0.0254 + 0.0258 . Both standard ΛCDM values are disfavored at approximately 2 σ in the joint extension. Neither parameter departs significantly from its standard value when only that parameter is varied. This behavior arises because late-time distances favor w DE  > −1, while maintaining the early-Universe physical matter density requires a compensating positive w DM , which changes the mapping to the matter density today. Allowing dynamical dark energy further highlights the complexity of the situation: phantom crossing for dark energy makes w DM  = 0 consistent with the data, whereas a positive w DM preference persists when crossing is forbidden. Interestingly, the Padé- w parameterization that provides a flexible description of a class of quintessence models (with no phantom crossing), along with w DM free, is even mildly favored over the phantom-crossing w 0 w a model according to both the best-fit χ 2 and the deviance information criterion (DIC) under both CMB treatments. One can conclude that the apparent preference for phantom crossing may instead reflect deviations in the dark-matter sector rather than dark-energy dynamics alone. With future high-redshift distance measurements, particularly improved Ly α observations, together with growth and lensing probes, these possibilities may be further clarified.
暗物质真的是物质吗?
在宇宙学的标准模型中,假设暗物质是无压力的,状态方程为w = 0,暗能量为w = - 1。我们使用DESI DR2距离测量,包括最近的Ly α Alcock-Paczynski (AP)信息、暗能量调查(DES)超新星和两种互补的宇宙微波背景(CMB)处理,共同验证了这些假设。当w DM和w DE同时变化时,我们发现w DM = 0.00096 8−0.000496 + 0.000501,w DE = - 0.938 0−0.0262 + 0.0259(68%)。在另一种CMB处理中,在透镜光谱上边缘化,相应的约束是wdm = 0.00087 0−0.000410 + 0.000408和wde =−0.935 3−0.0254 + 0.0258。两种标准ΛCDM值在关节伸展约2 σ处都不理想。当只有该参数变化时,两个参数都不会显著偏离标准值。这种行为的出现是因为后期距离有利于wde >;−1,而维持早期宇宙的物理物质密度需要一个补偿的正wdm,这改变了对今天物质密度的映射。允许动态暗能量进一步突出了情况的复杂性:暗能量的幻影交叉使得w DM = 0与数据一致,而当交叉被禁止时,w DM的正偏好仍然存在。有趣的是,根据两种CMB处理下的最佳拟合χ 2和偏差信息准则(DIC), pad - w参数化提供了对一类典型模型(没有幻影交叉)的灵活描述,以及无w DM,甚至比幻影交叉w 0 w a模型更受欢迎。我们可以得出结论,对幻影交叉的明显偏好可能反映了暗物质部分的偏差,而不仅仅是暗能量动力学。随着未来的高红移距离测量,特别是改进的Ly α观测,以及生长和透镜探测器,这些可能性可能会进一步澄清。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书