Evoked alpha oscillatory activity is suppressed by prolonged elbow pain and modulated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Nahian S. Chowdhury,Joshua D. Hoddinott,Wei-Ju Chang,Donovan Cheng,Naveen Manivasagan,Siobhan M. Schabrun,David A. Seminowicz
{"title":"Evoked alpha oscillatory activity is suppressed by prolonged elbow pain and modulated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation","authors":"Nahian S. Chowdhury,Joshua D. Hoddinott,Wei-Ju Chang,Donovan Cheng,Naveen Manivasagan,Siobhan M. Schabrun,David A. Seminowicz","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000004126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Alpha-band oscillatory activity, assessed using electroencephalography (EEG), is among the most widely studied neurophysiological markers of pain. However, the literature has focused predominantly on resting-state measures, leaving unclear whether pain also alters evoked alpha-band dynamics, measured via cortical perturbation using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Here, we examined whether prolonged pain alters TMS-evoked alpha event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) and intertrial coherence (ITC), reflecting cortical reactivity and phase consistency, and whether 10-Hz repetitive TMS (rTMS) modulates these responses. We performed a secondary analysis on 2 previous experiments, which used nerve growth factor (NGF) injection to induce prolonged elbow muscle pain. In experiment 1, participants underwent primary motor cortex (M1) TMS-EEG at baseline (day 0) pre-NGF injection and day 2 (peak pain) and day 7 (pain resolution) post-injection. In experiment 2, M1-TMS-EEG was assessed on day 0 before NGF injection and again on day 4 after injection, with active or sham 10-Hz rTMS delivered to M1 between these assessments. In experiment 1, M1 TMS-EEG showed reductions in alpha ERSP ( P = 0.014) and alpha ITC ( P = 0.041) from day 0 to day 2. In experiment 2, active rTMS produced a more positive pre-to-post change in alpha ERSP ( P = 0.006) relative to sham but did not alter alpha ITC ( P = 0.804). Our findings suggest that prolonged experimental pain is associated with diminished evoked alpha oscillatory activity, whereas high-frequency rTMS modulates this activity in the positive direction. These findings suggest that perturbation-evoked alpha metrics warrant further investigation as candidate biomarkers of pain state and response to neuromodulation.","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000004126","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Alpha-band oscillatory activity, assessed using electroencephalography (EEG), is among the most widely studied neurophysiological markers of pain. However, the literature has focused predominantly on resting-state measures, leaving unclear whether pain also alters evoked alpha-band dynamics, measured via cortical perturbation using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Here, we examined whether prolonged pain alters TMS-evoked alpha event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) and intertrial coherence (ITC), reflecting cortical reactivity and phase consistency, and whether 10-Hz repetitive TMS (rTMS) modulates these responses. We performed a secondary analysis on 2 previous experiments, which used nerve growth factor (NGF) injection to induce prolonged elbow muscle pain. In experiment 1, participants underwent primary motor cortex (M1) TMS-EEG at baseline (day 0) pre-NGF injection and day 2 (peak pain) and day 7 (pain resolution) post-injection. In experiment 2, M1-TMS-EEG was assessed on day 0 before NGF injection and again on day 4 after injection, with active or sham 10-Hz rTMS delivered to M1 between these assessments. In experiment 1, M1 TMS-EEG showed reductions in alpha ERSP ( P = 0.014) and alpha ITC ( P = 0.041) from day 0 to day 2. In experiment 2, active rTMS produced a more positive pre-to-post change in alpha ERSP ( P = 0.006) relative to sham but did not alter alpha ITC ( P = 0.804). Our findings suggest that prolonged experimental pain is associated with diminished evoked alpha oscillatory activity, whereas high-frequency rTMS modulates this activity in the positive direction. These findings suggest that perturbation-evoked alpha metrics warrant further investigation as candidate biomarkers of pain state and response to neuromodulation.
诱发的α振荡活动被长时间的肘部疼痛所抑制,并被重复经颅磁刺激所调节
用脑电图(EEG)评估的α波段振荡活动是研究最广泛的疼痛神经生理标志物之一。然而,文献主要集中在静息状态的测量上,不清楚疼痛是否也会改变诱发的α带动力学,这是通过经颅磁刺激(TMS)皮质扰动测量的。在这里,我们研究了长时间的疼痛是否会改变TMS诱发的α事件相关谱扰动(ERSP)和试验间一致性(ITC),反映皮层反应性和相一致性,以及10hz重复性TMS (rTMS)是否会调节这些反应。我们对之前2个使用神经生长因子(NGF)注射诱导肘部肌肉长时间疼痛的实验进行了二次分析。在实验1中,参与者在注射ngf前(第0天)、注射后第2天(疼痛峰值)和第7天(疼痛缓解)进行初级运动皮层(M1) TMS-EEG检查。在实验2中,分别于NGF注射前第0天和注射后第4天对M1- tms - eeg进行评估,在两次评估之间分别对M1进行主动或假性10 hz rTMS。在实验1中,M1 TMS-EEG显示从第0天到第2天α ERSP (P = 0.014)和α ITC (P = 0.041)降低。在实验2中,相对于假手术,主动rTMS产生了更积极的α ERSP (P = 0.006),但没有改变α ITC (P = 0.804)。我们的研究结果表明,长时间的实验性疼痛与诱发α振荡活动的减少有关,而高频rTMS则向积极方向调节这种活动。这些发现表明,作为疼痛状态和神经调节反应的候选生物标志物,扰动诱发的α指标值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书