Review Article: Fibrosis‐4 Index in Steatotic Liver Disease—Past, Present and Future

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Kriti Soni,Vinay Jahagirdar,Omar Albhaisi,Richard K. Sterling,Juan Pablo Arab,Hanna Blaney,Luis Antonio Díaz
{"title":"Review Article: Fibrosis‐4 Index in Steatotic Liver Disease—Past, Present and Future","authors":"Kriti Soni,Vinay Jahagirdar,Omar Albhaisi,Richard K. Sterling,Juan Pablo Arab,Hanna Blaney,Luis Antonio Díaz","doi":"10.1111/apt.71037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Steatotic liver disease (SLD) is highly prevalent, and fibrosis stage is the strongest determinant of liver‐related outcomes, hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality. Liver biopsy remains the reference standard for staging, but it is invasive, subject to sampling and observer variability. These limitations have accelerated the use of noninvasive tests (NITs) across various settings. Aims This review summarizes the past, present and future of the Fibrosis‐4 (FIB‐4) index in SLD. Methods We reviewed the development of serum‐based fibrosis assessment, validation of FIB‐4 across SLD subtypes, its incorporation into clinical pathways, real‐world performance and potential role in precision therapy and longitudinal risk assessment. Results Initially derived in patients with HIV/hepatitis C coinfection using age, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and platelet count, FIB‐4 has since been validated across SLD populations. FIB‐4 generally provides moderate discrimination for advanced fibrosis and high negative predictive value (NPV) when used with dual thresholds and age‐adjusted cutoffs. Modern care pathways operationalize FIB‐4 as the first‐line triage test, followed by transient elastography or another second line test for indeterminate or elevated results, with specialty referral and selective biopsy reserved for diagnostic uncertainty or discordant testing. Conclusions In the precision therapy era, FIB‐4 remains a scalable front‐door test but should not serve as a stand‐alone selector for drug eligibility; confirmatory staging is required to identify F2–F3 disease and exclude cirrhosis. Future directions include trajectory‐based monitoring, integration with elastography and multi‐analyte biomarkers, and selective layering of genetic risk to refine prognosis in intermediate and high‐risk strata.","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"480 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.71037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Steatotic liver disease (SLD) is highly prevalent, and fibrosis stage is the strongest determinant of liver‐related outcomes, hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality. Liver biopsy remains the reference standard for staging, but it is invasive, subject to sampling and observer variability. These limitations have accelerated the use of noninvasive tests (NITs) across various settings. Aims This review summarizes the past, present and future of the Fibrosis‐4 (FIB‐4) index in SLD. Methods We reviewed the development of serum‐based fibrosis assessment, validation of FIB‐4 across SLD subtypes, its incorporation into clinical pathways, real‐world performance and potential role in precision therapy and longitudinal risk assessment. Results Initially derived in patients with HIV/hepatitis C coinfection using age, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and platelet count, FIB‐4 has since been validated across SLD populations. FIB‐4 generally provides moderate discrimination for advanced fibrosis and high negative predictive value (NPV) when used with dual thresholds and age‐adjusted cutoffs. Modern care pathways operationalize FIB‐4 as the first‐line triage test, followed by transient elastography or another second line test for indeterminate or elevated results, with specialty referral and selective biopsy reserved for diagnostic uncertainty or discordant testing. Conclusions In the precision therapy era, FIB‐4 remains a scalable front‐door test but should not serve as a stand‐alone selector for drug eligibility; confirmatory staging is required to identify F2–F3 disease and exclude cirrhosis. Future directions include trajectory‐based monitoring, integration with elastography and multi‐analyte biomarkers, and selective layering of genetic risk to refine prognosis in intermediate and high‐risk strata.
综述文章:脂肪变性肝病的纤维化- 4指数——过去、现在和未来
背景:脂肪变性肝病(SLD)非常普遍,纤维化阶段是肝脏相关结局、肝细胞癌和死亡率的最强决定因素。肝活检仍然是分期的参考标准,但它是侵入性的,受制于采样和观察者的可变性。这些限制加速了非侵入性检测(nit)在各种环境中的应用。本文综述了SLD中纤维化- 4 (FIB - 4)指数的过去、现在和未来。方法我们回顾了基于血清的纤维化评估的发展,跨SLD亚型FIB - 4的验证,其在临床途径中的应用,现实世界的表现以及在精确治疗和纵向风险评估中的潜在作用。结果FIB‐4最初通过年龄、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)、丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)和血小板计数在HIV/丙型肝炎合并感染患者中获得,后来在SLD人群中得到验证。FIB‐4通常对晚期纤维化有中等程度的区分,当使用双阈值和年龄调整截止值时,具有高阴性预测值(NPV)。现代护理途径将FIB - 4作为一线分诊检查,然后进行瞬时弹性成像或其他二线检查,以确定或升高的结果,专科转诊和选择性活检保留诊断不确定或不一致的测试。结论:在精准治疗时代,FIB - 4仍然是一个可扩展的前门测试,但不应作为药物资格的独立选择;需要确定分期以确定F2-F3疾病并排除肝硬化。未来的方向包括基于轨迹的监测,与弹性成像和多分析物生物标志物的结合,以及选择性地分层遗传风险来改善中高风险层的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书