Over-the-counter analgesics improve postconcussion symptoms and recovery: findings from the Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium

IF 15.5 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Kyle Arnold,Anish Mukherjee,Yeo Won Kim,Kira Rosenlind,Steven Broglio,Michael A McCrea,Thomas McAllister,Tara Lani Sharma
{"title":"Over-the-counter analgesics improve postconcussion symptoms and recovery: findings from the Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium","authors":"Kyle Arnold,Anish Mukherjee,Yeo Won Kim,Kira Rosenlind,Steven Broglio,Michael A McCrea,Thomas McAllister,Tara Lani Sharma","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2025-110753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To determine if postinjury over-the-counter (OTC) analgesic use, along with type and timing of medications, is associated with improved concussion recovery and symptom severity in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and non-NCAA athletes. Methods This cohort study was conducted by the NCAA and Department of Defense Concussion Assessment, Research and Education Consortium from 2014 to 2022. Athletes included were those who used OTC analgesics for < 3 days and those who did not use OTC analgesics postinjury. OTC analgesic type was categorised as acetaminophen (n=463), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, n=77), both (n=34) and no OTC analgesic use (n=848). Concussion recovery was measured as days from injury to clearance to return to unrestricted play (time to URTP). Symptom and headache severity were derived from the Sports Concussion Assessment Tool third edition (SCAT3) taken at baseline, <48 hours postinjury (median <1 day postinjury) and 3 days postinjury (median 3 days postinjury). Results There were 576 who did and 848 who did not use OTC analgesics included in the study. OTC analgesic use was associated with a higher rate of URTP adjusted HR (aHR) (aHR 1.25 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.39)) and lower 3-day postinjury SCAT3 symptom ( e α =0.70 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.79)) and headache ( e α = 0.89 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.94)) severity scores. Early OTC analgesic use (≤2 days) was associated with a higher rate of URTP compared with delayed (>2 days) use after injury (HR 1.36 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.53)). There was little association among acetaminophen, NSAIDs and both for outcome measures. Conclusions This study shows that OTC analgesic use postinjury is associated with lower symptom severity and a faster recovery after concussion.","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"bjsports-2025-110753"},"PeriodicalIF":15.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2025-110753","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives To determine if postinjury over-the-counter (OTC) analgesic use, along with type and timing of medications, is associated with improved concussion recovery and symptom severity in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and non-NCAA athletes. Methods This cohort study was conducted by the NCAA and Department of Defense Concussion Assessment, Research and Education Consortium from 2014 to 2022. Athletes included were those who used OTC analgesics for < 3 days and those who did not use OTC analgesics postinjury. OTC analgesic type was categorised as acetaminophen (n=463), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, n=77), both (n=34) and no OTC analgesic use (n=848). Concussion recovery was measured as days from injury to clearance to return to unrestricted play (time to URTP). Symptom and headache severity were derived from the Sports Concussion Assessment Tool third edition (SCAT3) taken at baseline, <48 hours postinjury (median <1 day postinjury) and 3 days postinjury (median 3 days postinjury). Results There were 576 who did and 848 who did not use OTC analgesics included in the study. OTC analgesic use was associated with a higher rate of URTP adjusted HR (aHR) (aHR 1.25 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.39)) and lower 3-day postinjury SCAT3 symptom ( e α =0.70 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.79)) and headache ( e α = 0.89 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.94)) severity scores. Early OTC analgesic use (≤2 days) was associated with a higher rate of URTP compared with delayed (>2 days) use after injury (HR 1.36 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.53)). There was little association among acetaminophen, NSAIDs and both for outcome measures. Conclusions This study shows that OTC analgesic use postinjury is associated with lower symptom severity and a faster recovery after concussion.
非处方止痛剂改善脑震荡后症状和恢复:脑震荡评估、研究和教育(CARE)联盟的研究结果
目的研究美国大学生体育协会(NCAA)和非NCAA运动员损伤后非处方(OTC)镇痛药的使用,以及药物的类型和时间,是否与改善脑震荡恢复和症状严重程度有关。方法采用2014 - 2022年NCAA与国防部脑震荡评估、研究与教育联盟进行的队列研究。纳入的运动员包括使用OTC镇痛药3天的运动员和受伤后未使用OTC镇痛药的运动员。OTC镇痛药类型分为对乙酰氨基酚(n=463)、非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs, n=77)、两者均使用(n=34)和未使用OTC镇痛药(n=848)。脑震荡的恢复以从受伤到恢复到不受限制比赛的天数(到URTP的时间)来衡量。症状和头痛严重程度根据运动脑震荡评估工具第三版(SCAT3)在基线、损伤后48小时(中位损伤后1天)和损伤后3天(中位损伤后3天)采集的数据得出。结果576例患者使用OTC镇痛药,848例患者未使用OTC镇痛药。非处方镇痛药的使用与较高的URTP调整HR (aHR)率(aHR 1.25 (95% CI 1.11 ~ 1.39))和较低的损伤后3天SCAT3症状(e α =0.70 (95% CI 0.62 ~ 0.79))和头痛(e α = 0.89 (95% CI 0.84 ~ 0.94))严重程度评分相关。与损伤后延迟使用(2天)相比,早期使用OTC镇痛药(≤2天)与更高的URTP发生率相关(HR 1.36 (95% CI 1.22至1.53))。对乙酰氨基酚、非甾体抗炎药以及两者在结果测量上几乎没有关联。结论损伤后使用非处方镇痛药可降低脑震荡后症状严重程度,加快恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Sports Medicine (BJSM) is a dynamic platform that presents groundbreaking research, thought-provoking reviews, and meaningful discussions on sport and exercise medicine. Our focus encompasses various clinically-relevant aspects such as physiotherapy, physical therapy, and rehabilitation. With an aim to foster innovation, education, and knowledge translation, we strive to bridge the gap between research and practical implementation in the field. Our multi-media approach, including web, print, video, and audio resources, along with our active presence on social media, connects a global community of healthcare professionals dedicated to treating active individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书