Measurement report: Global Total Ozone Records – Part 1: Ground-based monitoring networks performance assessment and status review

IF 5.7 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Xiaoyi Zhao,Vitali Fioletov,Irina Petropavlovskikh,Voltaire Velazco,Alberto Redondas,Anna Solomatnikova,Corinne Vigouroux,Kimberly Strong,Michel Van Roozendael,Andrea Pazmino,Thomas F. Hanisco,Alexander Cede,Martin Tiefengraber,Gordon Labow,Masatomo Fujiwara,Ronald van der A,Debora Griffin,Chris McLinden,Tom Kralidis,Wolfgang Steinbrecht,Sum Chi Lee
{"title":"Measurement report: Global Total Ozone Records – Part 1: Ground-based monitoring networks performance assessment and status review","authors":"Xiaoyi Zhao,Vitali Fioletov,Irina Petropavlovskikh,Voltaire Velazco,Alberto Redondas,Anna Solomatnikova,Corinne Vigouroux,Kimberly Strong,Michel Van Roozendael,Andrea Pazmino,Thomas F. Hanisco,Alexander Cede,Martin Tiefengraber,Gordon Labow,Masatomo Fujiwara,Ronald van der A,Debora Griffin,Chris McLinden,Tom Kralidis,Wolfgang Steinbrecht,Sum Chi Lee","doi":"10.5194/acp-26-13693-2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Total column ozone (TCO) has been observed since the 1920s, with a systematic monitoring network established during the International Geophysical Year (1957–1958). We compile and assess TCO records from six major ground-based instrument types: Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometers, Filter ozonometers, zenith-sky DOAS (UVVIS), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and Pandora spectrometers. Data are drawn from the World Ozone and Ultraviolet Radiation Data Centre, Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change, Pandonia Global Network, and European Brewer Network. Using harmonized statistical criteria and daily comparisons with multiple satellite products and four reanalysis datasets, we evaluate site-level performance in 5-year intervals from 1940 to 2024. Metrics include mean bias, variability of daily and monthly differences, seasonal amplitude, and the range of annual means, with percentile-based thresholds used to classify data quality. Ground-based annual means generally agree with satellite and reanalysis benchmarks within ± 2 %, with typical variability near 2 %. Larger discrepancies occur in the pre-satellite era, where reanalyses show biases of up to −5 % relative to Dobson observations. Network-wide distributions of daily mean differences to those from reanalysis and satellite data indicate comparable internal consistency for Brewer, Dobson, FTIR, and Pandora (standard deviations generally around 2 %), while Filter and UVVIS exhibit slightly broader spreads (< 3 %), especially at high latitudes. Network capacity has evolved substantially since the 2000s, with a decline in Dobson sites and expansion of Brewer and Pandora observations. By providing station-level flags and thresholds, this assessment helps network operators prioritize calibration and reprocessing efforts and helps users identify robust records, thereby improving confidence in long-term ozone trend detection and satellite validation.","PeriodicalId":8611,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics","volume":"11 1","pages":"13693-13720"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13693-2026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Total column ozone (TCO) has been observed since the 1920s, with a systematic monitoring network established during the International Geophysical Year (1957–1958). We compile and assess TCO records from six major ground-based instrument types: Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometers, Filter ozonometers, zenith-sky DOAS (UVVIS), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and Pandora spectrometers. Data are drawn from the World Ozone and Ultraviolet Radiation Data Centre, Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change, Pandonia Global Network, and European Brewer Network. Using harmonized statistical criteria and daily comparisons with multiple satellite products and four reanalysis datasets, we evaluate site-level performance in 5-year intervals from 1940 to 2024. Metrics include mean bias, variability of daily and monthly differences, seasonal amplitude, and the range of annual means, with percentile-based thresholds used to classify data quality. Ground-based annual means generally agree with satellite and reanalysis benchmarks within ± 2 %, with typical variability near 2 %. Larger discrepancies occur in the pre-satellite era, where reanalyses show biases of up to −5 % relative to Dobson observations. Network-wide distributions of daily mean differences to those from reanalysis and satellite data indicate comparable internal consistency for Brewer, Dobson, FTIR, and Pandora (standard deviations generally around 2 %), while Filter and UVVIS exhibit slightly broader spreads (< 3 %), especially at high latitudes. Network capacity has evolved substantially since the 2000s, with a decline in Dobson sites and expansion of Brewer and Pandora observations. By providing station-level flags and thresholds, this assessment helps network operators prioritize calibration and reprocessing efforts and helps users identify robust records, thereby improving confidence in long-term ozone trend detection and satellite validation.
测量报告:全球臭氧总量记录。第1部分:地面监测网络性能评估和状态审查
自20世纪20年代以来一直观测总臭氧层(TCO),并在国际地球物理年(1957-1958)期间建立了一个系统的监测网。我们编译并评估了六种主要地面仪器类型的TCO记录:多布森和布鲁尔分光光度计,过滤器臭氧计,天顶-天空DOAS (UVVIS),傅里叶变换红外(FTIR)光谱仪和潘多拉光谱仪。数据来自世界臭氧和紫外线辐射数据中心、大气成分变化探测网络、潘多尼亚全球网络和欧洲布鲁尔网络。利用统一的统计标准和与多个卫星产品和四个再分析数据集的日常比较,我们评估了从1940年到2024年的5年间隔的站点级性能。指标包括平均偏差、每日和每月差异的可变性、季节幅度和年平均值的范围,并使用基于百分位数的阈值对数据质量进行分类。地面年平均值通常与卫星和再分析基准在±2%范围内一致,典型变率接近2%。较大的差异出现在前卫星时代,重新分析显示相对于多布森观测值的偏差高达- 5%。与再分析和卫星数据的日平均差异的网络范围分布表明,Brewer、Dobson、FTIR和Pandora的内部一致性相当(标准偏差通常在2%左右),而Filter和UVVIS的差异略大(3%),特别是在高纬度地区。自2000年代以来,随着多布森站点的减少和布鲁尔和潘多拉观测的扩大,网络容量有了实质性的发展。通过提供站级标志和阈值,该评估有助于网络运营商优先考虑校准和再处理工作,并帮助用户识别可靠的记录,从而提高对长期臭氧趋势检测和卫星验证的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
20.60%
发文量
702
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP) is a not-for-profit international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and public discussion of high-quality studies investigating the Earth''s atmosphere and the underlying chemical and physical processes. It covers the altitude range from the land and ocean surface up to the turbopause, including the troposphere, stratosphere, and mesosphere. The main subject areas comprise atmospheric modelling, field measurements, remote sensing, and laboratory studies of gases, aerosols, clouds and precipitation, isotopes, radiation, dynamics, biosphere interactions, and hydrosphere interactions. The journal scope is focused on studies with general implications for atmospheric science rather than investigations that are primarily of local or technical interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书