Endphthalmitis after cataract surgery in Sweden 2018–2024: associations with preoperative visual acuity and intracameral antibiotic regimens

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Tomas Bro,Mats Lundström,Per Montan
{"title":"Endphthalmitis after cataract surgery in Sweden 2018–2024: associations with preoperative visual acuity and intracameral antibiotic regimens","authors":"Tomas Bro,Mats Lundström,Per Montan","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2026-330164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/aims Cataract surgery is one of the world’s most common and successful procedures. Postoperative endophthalmitis (PE) is rare but may be devastating. This study investigated associations between preoperative visual acuity (VA), other patient-related and surgery-related characteristics and PE. As a secondary objective, outcomes associated with the most commonly used intracameral antibiotic regimens were explored. Methods This retrospective cohort study used data from the population-based Swedish National Cataract Register from 2018 to 2024. Results Among 979 534 procedures, PE incidence was 0.013% (131 cases). In a multivariate analysis, male sex, ocular comorbidity and capsule complication showed higher ORs for PE while preoperative VA≥20/40 and immediate sequential bilateral surgery showed lower ORs for PE. Patients with better preoperative VA were younger and had fewer ocular comorbidities, intraoperative challenges and complications, indicating a more favourable case mix. Endophthalmitis rates varied by intracameral antibiotic regimen: 0.017% with cefuroxime alone, 0.011% with cefuroxime plus ampicillin and 0.010% with moxifloxacin. No regimen demonstrated statistically significant superiority. Enterococci occurred more frequently with cefuroxime. Time to PE diagnosis was longer with combination therapy and moxifloxacin versus cefuroxime alone. Visual outcomes were generally poor (48%<20/200), but moxifloxacin cases achieved≥20/40 final VA more often than cefuroxime (50% vs 23%). Conclusions PE incidence was very low. Better preoperative VA and immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery were associated with lower observed odds, probably reflecting favourable case mix and residual confounding rather than causal protection. No IC antibiotic regimen was independently associated with lower PE incidence.","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"225 1","pages":"bjo-2026-330164"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2026-330164","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims Cataract surgery is one of the world’s most common and successful procedures. Postoperative endophthalmitis (PE) is rare but may be devastating. This study investigated associations between preoperative visual acuity (VA), other patient-related and surgery-related characteristics and PE. As a secondary objective, outcomes associated with the most commonly used intracameral antibiotic regimens were explored. Methods This retrospective cohort study used data from the population-based Swedish National Cataract Register from 2018 to 2024. Results Among 979 534 procedures, PE incidence was 0.013% (131 cases). In a multivariate analysis, male sex, ocular comorbidity and capsule complication showed higher ORs for PE while preoperative VA≥20/40 and immediate sequential bilateral surgery showed lower ORs for PE. Patients with better preoperative VA were younger and had fewer ocular comorbidities, intraoperative challenges and complications, indicating a more favourable case mix. Endophthalmitis rates varied by intracameral antibiotic regimen: 0.017% with cefuroxime alone, 0.011% with cefuroxime plus ampicillin and 0.010% with moxifloxacin. No regimen demonstrated statistically significant superiority. Enterococci occurred more frequently with cefuroxime. Time to PE diagnosis was longer with combination therapy and moxifloxacin versus cefuroxime alone. Visual outcomes were generally poor (48%<20/200), but moxifloxacin cases achieved≥20/40 final VA more often than cefuroxime (50% vs 23%). Conclusions PE incidence was very low. Better preoperative VA and immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery were associated with lower observed odds, probably reflecting favourable case mix and residual confounding rather than causal protection. No IC antibiotic regimen was independently associated with lower PE incidence.
2018-2024年瑞典白内障术后眼内炎:与术前视力和内窥镜抗生素治疗方案的关系
背景/目的白内障手术是世界上最常见和最成功的手术之一。术后眼内炎(PE)是罕见的,但可能是毁灭性的。本研究调查了术前视力(VA)、其他患者相关和手术相关特征与PE之间的关系。作为次要目标,研究了与最常用的肠腔内抗生素方案相关的结果。方法本回顾性队列研究使用2018年至2024年瑞典国家白内障登记数据。结果979534例手术中PE发生率为0.013%(131例)。在多变量分析中,男性、眼部合病和囊膜并发症显示PE的高or,而术前VA≥20/40和立即顺序双侧手术显示PE的低or。术前VA较好的患者更年轻,眼部合并症、术中挑战和并发症较少,表明更有利的病例组合。眼内炎发生率随抗生素治疗方案的不同而不同:头孢呋辛单独治疗0.017%,头孢呋辛联合氨苄西林治疗0.011%,莫西沙星治疗0.010%。没有方案显示出统计学上显著的优势。头孢呋辛组肠球菌发生率更高。与单独使用头孢呋辛相比,联合使用莫西沙星到PE诊断的时间更长。视力结果一般较差(48%<20/200),但莫西沙星患者最终VA≥20/40的发生率高于头孢呋辛(50% vs 23%)。结论PE发生率极低。较好的术前VA和立即顺序双侧白内障手术与较低的观察到的几率相关,可能反映了有利的病例组合和残留的混杂,而不是因果保护。没有IC抗生素方案与较低的PE发生率独立相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书