MiKid-QA: construction and performance evaluation of a paediatric myopia education question-answering model

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Zixun Wang,Jingtao Yu,Tingyu Zhang,Daqian Lu,Yifan Li,Yabin Hu,Jun Zhou,Liqin Huang,Xiaoling Zhang,Xiaoxue Hu,Xueshuo Xie,Xu Yan,Jing Yang,Bei Du,Ruihua Wei
{"title":"MiKid-QA: construction and performance evaluation of a paediatric myopia education question-answering model","authors":"Zixun Wang,Jingtao Yu,Tingyu Zhang,Daqian Lu,Yifan Li,Yabin Hu,Jun Zhou,Liqin Huang,Xiaoling Zhang,Xiaoxue Hu,Xueshuo Xie,Xu Yan,Jing Yang,Bei Du,Ruihua Wei","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2026-329816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The surging prevalence of paediatric myopia has overwhelmed clinical education services. While general-purpose large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for medical information, they often lack the domain-specific precision required for specialised care. This study aimed to develop and evaluate Myopia in Kids Question-Answering (MiKid-QA), a paediatric myopia education question-answering model fine-tuned to support standardised patient education. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation study. MiKid-QA was developed by fine-tuning the Qwen2.5-32B model using low-rank adaptation (LoRA) on curated professional datasets (2015–2025), including textbooks and expert consensus. Performance was assessed against DeepSeek and GPT-4 through a multicentre, single-blind expert evaluation of 25 standardised clinical scenarios. A panel of specialists rated responses across five dimensions (correctness, completeness, readability, helpfulness and safety) using a 5-point Likert scale. Results MiKid-QA demonstrated superior automated performance compared with its base model (Bilingual Evaluation Understudy: 0.1423 vs 0.0967). In expert evaluations, MiKid-QA achieved significantly higher scores for correctness (4.43±0.63) and safety (4.38±0.59) compared with DeepSeek and GPT-4 (all p<0.001). While completeness and helpfulness were comparable (p>0.05), MiKid-QA produced more concise responses and lower reading difficulty than GPT-4 (p<0.001), suggesting a potentially favourable balance between information accuracy and patient accessibility in standardised educational scenarios. Conclusion Specialised fine-tuning on curated myopia-related datasets was associated with higher expert-rated correctness and safety in standardised myopia education scenarios. MiKid-QA may serve as an auxiliary educational tool to support patient communication in myopia care, although further external validation and prospective clinical studies are required before clinical deployment.","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"91 1","pages":"bjo-2026-329816"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2026-329816","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The surging prevalence of paediatric myopia has overwhelmed clinical education services. While general-purpose large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for medical information, they often lack the domain-specific precision required for specialised care. This study aimed to develop and evaluate Myopia in Kids Question-Answering (MiKid-QA), a paediatric myopia education question-answering model fine-tuned to support standardised patient education. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation study. MiKid-QA was developed by fine-tuning the Qwen2.5-32B model using low-rank adaptation (LoRA) on curated professional datasets (2015–2025), including textbooks and expert consensus. Performance was assessed against DeepSeek and GPT-4 through a multicentre, single-blind expert evaluation of 25 standardised clinical scenarios. A panel of specialists rated responses across five dimensions (correctness, completeness, readability, helpfulness and safety) using a 5-point Likert scale. Results MiKid-QA demonstrated superior automated performance compared with its base model (Bilingual Evaluation Understudy: 0.1423 vs 0.0967). In expert evaluations, MiKid-QA achieved significantly higher scores for correctness (4.43±0.63) and safety (4.38±0.59) compared with DeepSeek and GPT-4 (all p<0.001). While completeness and helpfulness were comparable (p>0.05), MiKid-QA produced more concise responses and lower reading difficulty than GPT-4 (p<0.001), suggesting a potentially favourable balance between information accuracy and patient accessibility in standardised educational scenarios. Conclusion Specialised fine-tuning on curated myopia-related datasets was associated with higher expert-rated correctness and safety in standardised myopia education scenarios. MiKid-QA may serve as an auxiliary educational tool to support patient communication in myopia care, although further external validation and prospective clinical studies are required before clinical deployment.
MiKid-QA:儿童近视教育问答模型的构建与绩效评价
背景儿童近视发病率的不断上升已使临床教育服务不堪重负。虽然通用大型语言模型(llm)越来越多地用于医疗信息,但它们往往缺乏专业护理所需的特定领域的精度。本研究旨在开发和评估儿童近视问答(MiKid-QA),这是一个经过精细调整的儿童近视教育问答模型,以支持标准化的患者教育。方法采用横断面评价研究。MiKid-QA是在整理的专业数据集(2015-2025)上,使用低秩自适应(LoRA)对Qwen2.5-32B模型进行微调而开发的,包括教科书和专家共识。通过对25个标准化临床场景的多中心单盲专家评估,对DeepSeek和GPT-4进行了性能评估。一个专家小组使用5分李克特量表对五个维度(正确性、完整性、可读性、有用性和安全性)的回答进行评分。结果与基本模型相比,MiKid-QA表现出更好的自动化性能(双语评估Understudy: 0.1423 vs 0.0967)。在专家评估中,MiKid-QA在正确性(4.43±0.63)和安全性(4.38±0.59)方面的得分明显高于DeepSeek和GPT-4(均为0.001)。虽然完整性和帮助性相当(p>0.05),但MiKid-QA比GPT-4产生更简洁的回答和更低的阅读难度(p> 0.001),这表明在标准化教育场景中,信息准确性和患者可及性之间存在潜在的有利平衡。结论:在标准化近视教育场景中,对精心整理的近视相关数据集进行专门微调可提高专家评价的正确性和安全性。MiKid-QA可以作为辅助教育工具来支持近视护理中的患者交流,尽管在临床应用之前需要进一步的外部验证和前瞻性临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书