Association between varicose veins and central serous chorioretinopathy

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Bertan Cakir,Negin Yavari,Lucie Y Guo,Chase A Ludwig,Ehsan Rahimy,Elizabeth J Rossin,Prithvi Mruthyunjaya,Karen M Wai
{"title":"Association between varicose veins and central serous chorioretinopathy","authors":"Bertan Cakir,Negin Yavari,Lucie Y Guo,Chase A Ludwig,Ehsan Rahimy,Elizabeth J Rossin,Prithvi Mruthyunjaya,Karen M Wai","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2026-330067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim To investigate the association between varicose veins and central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR), based on emerging genetic evidence of a shared vascular mechanism. Methods Propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network. Patients with varicose veins (n=621 513) were matched 1:1 to controls without varicose veins on age, sex, race and ethnicity, with prior CSCR or serous pigment epithelial detachment (PED) excluded. A secondary analysis excluded glucocorticoid users and additionally matched on hypertension, sleep apnoea and healthcare utilisation. A tertiary analysis compared thromboembolic risk (pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT)) in varicose vein patients with and without CSCR. Results Varicose veins were significantly associated with CSCR (risk ratio (RR) 2.16; 95% CI 1.86 to 2.52; p<0.0001) and serous PED (RR 1.97; 95% CI 1.69 to 2.93; p<0.0001). Associations persisted after excluding glucocorticoid users and adjusting for comorbidities (CSCR RR 1.83; 95% CI 1.22 to 2.75; p=0.003; PED RR 1.95; 95% CI 1.38 to 3.34; p=0.013). Among varicose vein patients, rates of DVT (RR 1.36; p=0.078) and PE (RR 1.41; p=0.14) did not differ significantly between those with and without CSCR. Conclusions Varicose veins were significantly associated with CSCR and serous PED, independent of glucocorticoid exposure and known comorbidities, supporting a possible systemic vascular mechanism in CSCR pathophysiology.","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"21 1","pages":"bjo-2026-330067"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2026-330067","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim To investigate the association between varicose veins and central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR), based on emerging genetic evidence of a shared vascular mechanism. Methods Propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network. Patients with varicose veins (n=621 513) were matched 1:1 to controls without varicose veins on age, sex, race and ethnicity, with prior CSCR or serous pigment epithelial detachment (PED) excluded. A secondary analysis excluded glucocorticoid users and additionally matched on hypertension, sleep apnoea and healthcare utilisation. A tertiary analysis compared thromboembolic risk (pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT)) in varicose vein patients with and without CSCR. Results Varicose veins were significantly associated with CSCR (risk ratio (RR) 2.16; 95% CI 1.86 to 2.52; p<0.0001) and serous PED (RR 1.97; 95% CI 1.69 to 2.93; p<0.0001). Associations persisted after excluding glucocorticoid users and adjusting for comorbidities (CSCR RR 1.83; 95% CI 1.22 to 2.75; p=0.003; PED RR 1.95; 95% CI 1.38 to 3.34; p=0.013). Among varicose vein patients, rates of DVT (RR 1.36; p=0.078) and PE (RR 1.41; p=0.14) did not differ significantly between those with and without CSCR. Conclusions Varicose veins were significantly associated with CSCR and serous PED, independent of glucocorticoid exposure and known comorbidities, supporting a possible systemic vascular mechanism in CSCR pathophysiology.
静脉曲张与中央浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的关系
目的探讨静脉曲张与中枢性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(CSCR)之间的关系,基于一个共同的血管机制的新出现的遗传证据。方法使用TriNetX全球协作网络进行倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究。静脉曲张患者(n=621 513)与无静脉曲张的对照组按年龄、性别、种族和民族进行1:1匹配,排除既往CSCR或浆液色素上皮脱离(PED)。第二项分析排除了糖皮质激素使用者,并与高血压、睡眠呼吸暂停和医疗保健利用相匹配。一项三级分析比较了伴有和不伴有CSCR的静脉曲张患者的血栓栓塞风险(肺栓塞(PE)和深静脉血栓(DVT))。结果静脉曲张与CSCR有显著相关性(风险比(RR) 2.16;95% CI 1.86 ~ 2.52;p<0.0001)和严重PED (RR 1.97; 95% CI 1.69 ~ 2.93; p<0.0001)。排除糖皮质激素使用者并调整合并症后,相关性仍然存在(CSCR RR 1.83; 95% CI 1.22至2.75;p=0.003; PED RR 1.95; 95% CI 1.38至3.34;p=0.013)。在静脉曲张患者中,有和没有CSCR的患者DVT (RR 1.36, p=0.078)和PE (RR 1.41, p=0.14)的发生率无显著差异。结论静脉曲张与CSCR和浆液性PED显著相关,独立于糖皮质激素暴露和已知合并症,支持CSCR病理生理中可能的系统性血管机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书