Fire carbon emission constraints from space-based carbon monoxide retrievals during the 2019 intense burning season in Brazil

IF 5.7 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Anne-Wil van den Berg,Joram J. D. Hooghiem,Auke M. van der Woude,Pieter Rijsdijk,Roland Vernooij,Santiago Botía,Guido R. van der Werf,John B. Miller,Ingrid T. Luijkx,Maarten C. Krol,Wouter Peters
{"title":"Fire carbon emission constraints from space-based carbon monoxide retrievals during the 2019 intense burning season in Brazil","authors":"Anne-Wil van den Berg,Joram J. D. Hooghiem,Auke M. van der Woude,Pieter Rijsdijk,Roland Vernooij,Santiago Botía,Guido R. van der Werf,John B. Miller,Ingrid T. Luijkx,Maarten C. Krol,Wouter Peters","doi":"10.5194/acp-26-13929-2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2019, Brazil experienced an intensive fire season, despite the absence of major climate anomalies to enhance fire activity. Existing carbon monoxide (CO) emission estimates from state-of-the-art fire emission inventories differ by a factor two for the period and region. We provide a top-down estimate on CO emissions from these fires using the new CarbonTracker Europe – Long-Window/Short-Window (CTE-LW/SW) inverse modelling framework driven by column-averaged dry air CO mole fractions ( X CO ) from the MOPITT and TROPOMI satellite instruments. Our analysis indicates that the 2019 fires in Brazil released approximately 47 TgCO. Although structural atmospheric-chemistry related uncertainties remain (±15 TgCO), the inversions converged strongly to a common posterior (46–48 TgCO) independent of the prior emission inventory (GFED5.1, GFAS v1.2) or assimilated dataset (TROPOMI, MOPITT). Posterior fire emissions closely resemble the newly released GFED5.1, supporting recent advances in bottom-up fire modelling. Nonetheless, at the biome level, our results reveal a systematic underestimation – by roughly a factor of two – in the Cerrado and Caatinga savannas relative to both fire emission priors. While more targeted uncertainty assessments are required, we speculate that this emission gap unlikely stems from inversion choices alone and may indicate an underestimation of fuel loads or emission factors. Overall, we demonstrate CTE-LW/SW effectively leverages X CO to complement existing fire emission monitoring capacities at increasingly fine spatial resolution – a capability that is especially valuable in Brazil, where different fire regimes occur in close proximity and fire activity has intensified in recent years.","PeriodicalId":8611,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics","volume":"10 1","pages":"13929-13958"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13929-2026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2019, Brazil experienced an intensive fire season, despite the absence of major climate anomalies to enhance fire activity. Existing carbon monoxide (CO) emission estimates from state-of-the-art fire emission inventories differ by a factor two for the period and region. We provide a top-down estimate on CO emissions from these fires using the new CarbonTracker Europe – Long-Window/Short-Window (CTE-LW/SW) inverse modelling framework driven by column-averaged dry air CO mole fractions ( X CO ) from the MOPITT and TROPOMI satellite instruments. Our analysis indicates that the 2019 fires in Brazil released approximately 47 TgCO. Although structural atmospheric-chemistry related uncertainties remain (±15 TgCO), the inversions converged strongly to a common posterior (46–48 TgCO) independent of the prior emission inventory (GFED5.1, GFAS v1.2) or assimilated dataset (TROPOMI, MOPITT). Posterior fire emissions closely resemble the newly released GFED5.1, supporting recent advances in bottom-up fire modelling. Nonetheless, at the biome level, our results reveal a systematic underestimation – by roughly a factor of two – in the Cerrado and Caatinga savannas relative to both fire emission priors. While more targeted uncertainty assessments are required, we speculate that this emission gap unlikely stems from inversion choices alone and may indicate an underestimation of fuel loads or emission factors. Overall, we demonstrate CTE-LW/SW effectively leverages X CO to complement existing fire emission monitoring capacities at increasingly fine spatial resolution – a capability that is especially valuable in Brazil, where different fire regimes occur in close proximity and fire activity has intensified in recent years.
2019年巴西强烈燃烧季节天基一氧化碳回收的火灾碳排放限制
2019年,尽管没有重大气候异常加剧火灾活动,但巴西经历了一个密集的火灾季节。根据最先进的火灾排放清单得出的现有一氧化碳(CO)排放量估算值在该时期和地区的差异为2倍。我们使用新的欧洲碳追踪器-长窗/短窗(CTE-LW/SW)逆建模框架,由MOPITT和TROPOMI卫星仪器的柱平均干燥空气CO摩尔分数(X CO)驱动,对这些火灾的CO排放量进行了自上而下的估计。我们的分析表明,2019年巴西的火灾释放了大约47亿吨二氧化碳当量。虽然结构大气化学相关的不确定性仍然存在(±15 TgCO),但反演结果强烈收敛到一个共同的后验(46-48 TgCO),独立于先前的排放清单(GFED5.1, GFAS v1.2)或同化的数据集(TROPOMI, MOPITT)。后火排放与新发布的GFED5.1非常相似,支持自下而上火灾模拟的最新进展。尽管如此,在生物群系水平上,我们的结果揭示了塞拉多和卡廷加热带稀树草原相对于两种火灾排放先验的系统性低估——大约低估了两倍。虽然需要更有针对性的不确定性评估,但我们推测这种排放差距不太可能仅仅源于反转选择,可能表明低估了燃料负荷或排放因素。总的来说,我们证明了CTE-LW/SW有效地利用X CO来补充现有的火灾排放监测能力,以越来越精细的空间分辨率-这一能力在巴西特别有价值,在巴西,不同的火灾制度发生在近距离,近年来火灾活动加剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
20.60%
发文量
702
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP) is a not-for-profit international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and public discussion of high-quality studies investigating the Earth''s atmosphere and the underlying chemical and physical processes. It covers the altitude range from the land and ocean surface up to the turbopause, including the troposphere, stratosphere, and mesosphere. The main subject areas comprise atmospheric modelling, field measurements, remote sensing, and laboratory studies of gases, aerosols, clouds and precipitation, isotopes, radiation, dynamics, biosphere interactions, and hydrosphere interactions. The journal scope is focused on studies with general implications for atmospheric science rather than investigations that are primarily of local or technical interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书