Oral small-molecule GLP-1RA safiglipron versus dapagliflozin in type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, active-comparator-controlled phase 3 trial

IF 52.5 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Lixin Guo  (郭立新), Dongni Yu  (于冬妮), Yimei Xu  (徐奕玫), Guo Tang  (唐果), Liang Peng  (彭亮), Chao Meng  (孟超), Meng Zhao  (赵猛), Wen Hu  (胡文), Debin Huang  (黄德斌), Chaoyang Zeng  (曾朝阳), Lei Yu  (于磊), Guangxiu Wu  (吴光秀), Lihui Zhang  (张力辉), Yuan Gao  (高远), Tingyan Zhong  (钟庭艳), Zi Ye  (叶子), on behalf of the OUTSTAND-2 Investigator Group
{"title":"Oral small-molecule GLP-1RA safiglipron versus dapagliflozin in type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, active-comparator-controlled phase 3 trial","authors":"Lixin Guo \n (郭立新), Dongni Yu \n (于冬妮), Yimei Xu \n (徐奕玫), Guo Tang \n (唐果), Liang Peng \n (彭亮), Chao Meng \n (孟超), Meng Zhao \n (赵猛), Wen Hu \n (胡文), Debin Huang \n (黄德斌), Chaoyang Zeng \n (曾朝阳), Lei Yu \n (于磊), Guangxiu Wu \n (吴光秀), Lihui Zhang \n (张力辉), Yuan Gao \n (高远), Tingyan Zhong \n (钟庭艳), Zi Ye \n (叶子), on behalf of the OUTSTAND-2 Investigator Group","doi":"10.1038/s41591-026-04713-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Safiglipron is an oral small-molecule glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist administered without fasting or dietary restrictions. We evaluated its efficacy and safety versus dapagliflozin in OUTSTAND-2, a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-comparator-controlled trial conducted at 98 sites in China. We randomized 810 adults (mean hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) 8.60%, median diabetes duration 5.0 years, 35.7% women) to safiglipron 30 mg (n = 202), safiglipron 60 mg (n = 203), safiglipron 90 mg (n = 203) or dapagliflozin 10 mg (n = 202) for 32 weeks, followed by a 20-week active-treatment extension. For the primary endpoint, treatment differences versus dapagliflozin in change from baseline in HbA1c at week 32 under the primary non-inferiority estimand were −0.30% (95% confidence interval (CI): −0.51 to −0.09), −0.22% (−0.44 to −0.01) and −0.40% (−0.62 to −0.19) for safiglipron 30 mg, 60 mg and 90 mg, respectively, establishing non-inferiority for all three doses (all P < 0.0001; non-inferiority margin 0.4%). Under the treatment policy estimand, 90 mg met the prespecified statistical criterion for superiority (difference −0.25%; 95% CI: −0.45 to −0.05; one-sided P = 0.0067), whereas 60 mg did not (P = 0.0789), after which fixed-sequence testing stopped. HbA1c target attainment rates with safiglipron versus dapagliflozin were 54.9−63.5% versus 36.5% for HbA1c <7.0% and 38.9−48.6% versus 16.1% for HbA1c ≤6.5%. Mean body weight changes were −2.35%, −3.55%, −4.17% and −3.60% for safiglipron 30 mg, safiglipron 60 mg, safiglipron 90 mg and dapagliflozin, respectively. Fasting plasma glucose, seven-point self-monitored blood glucose profiles, waist circumference, HOMA-β, HOMA-IR and changes in treatment satisfaction showed varying degrees of improvement from baseline with both safiglipron and dapagliflozin. Rescue therapy was used by 0.5−1.5% versus 0% of participants, respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent with safiglipron and mostly mild or moderate; adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 4.0%, 4.0%, 3.9% and 1.5% of participants, respectively. Safiglipron provides an effective oral treatment option for adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06589765.","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":52.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04713-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Safiglipron is an oral small-molecule glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist administered without fasting or dietary restrictions. We evaluated its efficacy and safety versus dapagliflozin in OUTSTAND-2, a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-comparator-controlled trial conducted at 98 sites in China. We randomized 810 adults (mean hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) 8.60%, median diabetes duration 5.0 years, 35.7% women) to safiglipron 30 mg (n = 202), safiglipron 60 mg (n = 203), safiglipron 90 mg (n = 203) or dapagliflozin 10 mg (n = 202) for 32 weeks, followed by a 20-week active-treatment extension. For the primary endpoint, treatment differences versus dapagliflozin in change from baseline in HbA1c at week 32 under the primary non-inferiority estimand were −0.30% (95% confidence interval (CI): −0.51 to −0.09), −0.22% (−0.44 to −0.01) and −0.40% (−0.62 to −0.19) for safiglipron 30 mg, 60 mg and 90 mg, respectively, establishing non-inferiority for all three doses (all P < 0.0001; non-inferiority margin 0.4%). Under the treatment policy estimand, 90 mg met the prespecified statistical criterion for superiority (difference −0.25%; 95% CI: −0.45 to −0.05; one-sided P = 0.0067), whereas 60 mg did not (P = 0.0789), after which fixed-sequence testing stopped. HbA1c target attainment rates with safiglipron versus dapagliflozin were 54.9−63.5% versus 36.5% for HbA1c <7.0% and 38.9−48.6% versus 16.1% for HbA1c ≤6.5%. Mean body weight changes were −2.35%, −3.55%, −4.17% and −3.60% for safiglipron 30 mg, safiglipron 60 mg, safiglipron 90 mg and dapagliflozin, respectively. Fasting plasma glucose, seven-point self-monitored blood glucose profiles, waist circumference, HOMA-β, HOMA-IR and changes in treatment satisfaction showed varying degrees of improvement from baseline with both safiglipron and dapagliflozin. Rescue therapy was used by 0.5−1.5% versus 0% of participants, respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent with safiglipron and mostly mild or moderate; adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 4.0%, 4.0%, 3.9% and 1.5% of participants, respectively. Safiglipron provides an effective oral treatment option for adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06589765.

Abstract Image

口服小分子GLP-1RA萨菲格列酮与达格列净治疗2型糖尿病:一项随机、双盲、主动对照的3期试验
沙非格pron是一种口服小分子胰高血糖素样肽-1 (GLP-1)受体激动剂,无需禁食或饮食限制。我们在中国98个地点进行的一项多中心、随机、双盲、双虚拟、主动对照试验OUTSTAND-2中评估了其与达格列净的疗效和安全性。我们将810名成人(平均血红蛋白A1C (HbA1c)为8.60%,中位糖尿病病程为5.0年,女性为35.7%)随机分为沙格列酮30 mg (n = 202)、沙格列酮60 mg (n = 203)、沙格列酮90 mg (n = 203)或达格列净10 mg (n = 202)组,持续32周,随后延长20周积极治疗。对于主要终点,在主要非劣效性估计下,32周时与达格列净的HbA1c基线变化的治疗差异分别为- 0.30%(95%可信区间(CI): - 0.51至- 0.09),- 0.22%(- 0.44至- 0.01)和- 0.40%(- 0.62至- 0.19),三种剂量的沙格列酮均为非劣效性(均P < 0.0001;非劣效性边际为0.4%)。在治疗政策估计下,90 mg符合预定的统计标准(差异为- 0.25%;95% CI: - 0.45至- 0.05;单侧P = 0.0067),而60 mg不符合(P = 0.0789),在此之后停止固定序列试验。在HbA1c <7.0%时,沙菲格酮与达格列净的HbA1c目标达标率分别为54.9 - 63.5%和36.5%;在HbA1c≤6.5%时,沙菲格酮与达格列净的HbA1c目标达标率分别为38.9 - 48.6%和16.1%。萨格列酮30 mg、萨格列酮60 mg、萨格列酮90 mg和达格列净组的平均体重变化分别为- 2.35%、- 3.55%、- 4.17%和- 3.60%。空腹血糖、7点自我监测血糖谱、腰围、HOMA-β、HOMA- ir和治疗满意度的变化显示,与基线相比,沙格列酮和达格列净均有不同程度的改善。分别有0.5 - 1.5%和0%的参与者使用抢救治疗。胃肠道不良事件更频繁使用萨非格氟龙,且多为轻度或中度;不良事件导致中断治疗的比例分别为4.0%、4.0%、3.9%和1.5%。对于二甲双胍控制不充分的成人2型糖尿病患者,沙非利普龙是一种有效的口服治疗选择。ClinicalTrials.gov识别码:NCT06589765。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书