{"title":"Coupling water balance and vegetation carbon dynamics in a parsimonious global hydrologic model","authors":"Guta Wakbulcho Abeshu, Hong-Yi Li, L.Ruby Leung","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.136520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding ecohydrological responses to environmental change requires parsimonious models that can represent interactions between water balance and vegetation carbon uptake. Simple conceptual hydrologic models efficiently simulate runoff and evapotranspiration, but they usually lack dynamic vegetation representation. We extend the <ce:italic>abcd</ce:italic> monthly water-balance model to simulate coupled water–carbon dynamics by integrating the Horton Index framework with a two-parameter Gross Primary Productivity–Evapotranspiration (GPP–ET) functional relationship. The resulting eight-parameter framework is calibrated using observation-constrained runoff and GPP, while ET is withheld from the calibration objective and evaluated independently. Using GSWP3-W5E5 forcing, FLUXCOM-X BASE GPP and ET, and GRUN-ensemble runoff over 235 global basins, we calibrate the model for 2001–2014 and evaluate it independently for 2015–2019. During validation, the model reproduces GPP robustly, with a median Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE) of 0.758 and positive KGE in 97.9% of basins. ET performance is also broadly positive despite not being directly calibrated, with a median validation KGE of 0.673 and positive KGE in 87.7% of basins. Runoff skill is moderate and more heterogeneous, with a median validation KGE of 0.435 and positive KGE in 81.7% of basins. Seasonal-cycle and anomaly analyses show that the model strongly captures the climatological timing of GPP and ET while retaining meaningful anomaly skill after removing the mean annual cycle. The calibrated coupling parameters <mml:math altimg=\"si11.svg\"><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi></mml:math>, <mml:math altimg=\"si12.svg\"><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:math>, and <mml:math altimg=\"si13.svg\"><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:math> exhibit geographically organized patterns consistent with their physically interpretable roles in evaporative partitioning and water–carbon coupling, while <mml:math altimg=\"si12.svg\"><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:math> and <mml:math altimg=\"si13.svg\"><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:math> remain effective model-scale rather than intrinsic physiological coefficients. These results show that a parsimonious monthly hydrologic model can be extended to diagnose first-order coupled water–carbon dynamics while retaining interpretable structure and computational efficiency.","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.136520","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding ecohydrological responses to environmental change requires parsimonious models that can represent interactions between water balance and vegetation carbon uptake. Simple conceptual hydrologic models efficiently simulate runoff and evapotranspiration, but they usually lack dynamic vegetation representation. We extend the abcd monthly water-balance model to simulate coupled water–carbon dynamics by integrating the Horton Index framework with a two-parameter Gross Primary Productivity–Evapotranspiration (GPP–ET) functional relationship. The resulting eight-parameter framework is calibrated using observation-constrained runoff and GPP, while ET is withheld from the calibration objective and evaluated independently. Using GSWP3-W5E5 forcing, FLUXCOM-X BASE GPP and ET, and GRUN-ensemble runoff over 235 global basins, we calibrate the model for 2001–2014 and evaluate it independently for 2015–2019. During validation, the model reproduces GPP robustly, with a median Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE) of 0.758 and positive KGE in 97.9% of basins. ET performance is also broadly positive despite not being directly calibrated, with a median validation KGE of 0.673 and positive KGE in 87.7% of basins. Runoff skill is moderate and more heterogeneous, with a median validation KGE of 0.435 and positive KGE in 81.7% of basins. Seasonal-cycle and anomaly analyses show that the model strongly captures the climatological timing of GPP and ET while retaining meaningful anomaly skill after removing the mean annual cycle. The calibrated coupling parameters λ, β, and α exhibit geographically organized patterns consistent with their physically interpretable roles in evaporative partitioning and water–carbon coupling, while β and α remain effective model-scale rather than intrinsic physiological coefficients. These results show that a parsimonious monthly hydrologic model can be extended to diagnose first-order coupled water–carbon dynamics while retaining interpretable structure and computational efficiency.
理解生态水文对环境变化的响应需要简洁的模型,可以代表水平衡和植被碳吸收之间的相互作用。简单的概念水文模型可以有效地模拟径流和蒸散发,但它们通常缺乏动态植被表示。我们扩展abcd月水平衡模型,通过整合Horton指数框架和两个参数的总初级生产力-蒸散(GPP-ET)函数关系来模拟水-碳耦合动态。所得到的8参数框架使用观测约束径流和GPP进行校准,而ET从校准目标中保留,并独立评估。利用GSWP3-W5E5强迫、FLUXCOM-X BASE GPP和ET以及GRUN-ensemble径流对全球235个流域的2001-2014年模型进行了定标,并对2015-2019年模型进行了独立评估。在验证过程中,该模型稳健地再现了GPP, KGE中位数为0.758,97.9%的流域KGE为正。尽管没有直接校准,但ET的表现也大致为正,验证KGE的中位数为0.673,87.7%的盆地的KGE为正。径流技能中等且异质性较强,验证KGE中位数为0.435,81.7%流域的KGE为正。季节周期和距平分析表明,该模式较好地捕捉了GPP和ET的气候时间,同时在去除平均年周期后仍保留了有意义的距平技能。校正后的耦合参数λ、β和α呈现出地理上有组织的模式,与它们在蒸发分配和水-碳耦合中的物理解释作用一致,而β和α仍然是有效的模型尺度而不是内在的生理系数。这些结果表明,一个简单的月水文模型可以扩展到诊断一阶水碳耦合动力学,同时保持可解释的结构和计算效率。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.