{"title":"Overlooked Sunfleck Properties and Potential Implications for Crop Improvement","authors":"Elias Kaiser, Rui Sun, Youngryel Ryu","doi":"10.1111/gcb.71147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Sunflecks are ubiquitous in crop canopies, yet their properties are understudied. Recent data indicates that on sunny days, wind-induced sunflecks within crop canopies (windflecks) occur roughly twice per second and at amplitudes of roughly 10% of full sunlight. However, studies on the effects of fluctuating light on photosynthesis and plant growth often use fluctuations that do not resemble sunflecks, possibly resulting in irrelevant crop improvement targets. In this review, first, we quantify this mismatch between experiments and reality, showing that most studies measuring light intensities in crop canopies did so too infrequently to capture all sunfleck properties, while studies either simulating dynamic photosynthesis or growing plants under fluctuating light did so using much slower fluctuations than those often encountered in the field. Second, we attempted to estimate the losses of photosynthesis due to sunflecks: using light intensity fluctuations recorded inside a rice canopy at high frequency (100 Hz) on a sunny day, a dynamic photosynthesis model based analysis calculated minimal losses (0.85%–1.24% diurnally; relative to steady-state simulations), suggesting that sunflecks are too frequent, short, and weak to cause substantial losses due to slow dynamics of photosynthesis. We found that the choice of light intensity pattern matters enormously, as estimated losses reached 13% diurnally when using a less realistic light intensity pattern. We also introduce a framework for determining photosynthesis under windflecks based on pulsed light experiments. Thirdly, we present an overview of effects of global climate change on dynamic photosynthesis and crop growth under fluctuating light, concluding that likely, rising [CO<sub>2</sub>] will benefit photosynthesis under sunflecks, whereas heat, VPD and drought may be detrimental. Finally, we suggest future research directions, noting that new targets for crop improvements under sunflecks will require a much better characterization of sunflecks, their windfleck and cloudfleck components, and their effects on photosynthesis and plant growth.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"32 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.71147","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sunflecks are ubiquitous in crop canopies, yet their properties are understudied. Recent data indicates that on sunny days, wind-induced sunflecks within crop canopies (windflecks) occur roughly twice per second and at amplitudes of roughly 10% of full sunlight. However, studies on the effects of fluctuating light on photosynthesis and plant growth often use fluctuations that do not resemble sunflecks, possibly resulting in irrelevant crop improvement targets. In this review, first, we quantify this mismatch between experiments and reality, showing that most studies measuring light intensities in crop canopies did so too infrequently to capture all sunfleck properties, while studies either simulating dynamic photosynthesis or growing plants under fluctuating light did so using much slower fluctuations than those often encountered in the field. Second, we attempted to estimate the losses of photosynthesis due to sunflecks: using light intensity fluctuations recorded inside a rice canopy at high frequency (100 Hz) on a sunny day, a dynamic photosynthesis model based analysis calculated minimal losses (0.85%–1.24% diurnally; relative to steady-state simulations), suggesting that sunflecks are too frequent, short, and weak to cause substantial losses due to slow dynamics of photosynthesis. We found that the choice of light intensity pattern matters enormously, as estimated losses reached 13% diurnally when using a less realistic light intensity pattern. We also introduce a framework for determining photosynthesis under windflecks based on pulsed light experiments. Thirdly, we present an overview of effects of global climate change on dynamic photosynthesis and crop growth under fluctuating light, concluding that likely, rising [CO2] will benefit photosynthesis under sunflecks, whereas heat, VPD and drought may be detrimental. Finally, we suggest future research directions, noting that new targets for crop improvements under sunflecks will require a much better characterization of sunflecks, their windfleck and cloudfleck components, and their effects on photosynthesis and plant growth.
期刊介绍:
Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health.
Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.