Overlooked Sunfleck Properties and Potential Implications for Crop Improvement

IF 12.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Elias Kaiser, Rui Sun, Youngryel Ryu
{"title":"Overlooked Sunfleck Properties and Potential Implications for Crop Improvement","authors":"Elias Kaiser,&nbsp;Rui Sun,&nbsp;Youngryel Ryu","doi":"10.1111/gcb.71147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Sunflecks are ubiquitous in crop canopies, yet their properties are understudied. Recent data indicates that on sunny days, wind-induced sunflecks within crop canopies (windflecks) occur roughly twice per second and at amplitudes of roughly 10% of full sunlight. However, studies on the effects of fluctuating light on photosynthesis and plant growth often use fluctuations that do not resemble sunflecks, possibly resulting in irrelevant crop improvement targets. In this review, first, we quantify this mismatch between experiments and reality, showing that most studies measuring light intensities in crop canopies did so too infrequently to capture all sunfleck properties, while studies either simulating dynamic photosynthesis or growing plants under fluctuating light did so using much slower fluctuations than those often encountered in the field. Second, we attempted to estimate the losses of photosynthesis due to sunflecks: using light intensity fluctuations recorded inside a rice canopy at high frequency (100 Hz) on a sunny day, a dynamic photosynthesis model based analysis calculated minimal losses (0.85%–1.24% diurnally; relative to steady-state simulations), suggesting that sunflecks are too frequent, short, and weak to cause substantial losses due to slow dynamics of photosynthesis. We found that the choice of light intensity pattern matters enormously, as estimated losses reached 13% diurnally when using a less realistic light intensity pattern. We also introduce a framework for determining photosynthesis under windflecks based on pulsed light experiments. Thirdly, we present an overview of effects of global climate change on dynamic photosynthesis and crop growth under fluctuating light, concluding that likely, rising [CO<sub>2</sub>] will benefit photosynthesis under sunflecks, whereas heat, VPD and drought may be detrimental. Finally, we suggest future research directions, noting that new targets for crop improvements under sunflecks will require a much better characterization of sunflecks, their windfleck and cloudfleck components, and their effects on photosynthesis and plant growth.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"32 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.71147","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sunflecks are ubiquitous in crop canopies, yet their properties are understudied. Recent data indicates that on sunny days, wind-induced sunflecks within crop canopies (windflecks) occur roughly twice per second and at amplitudes of roughly 10% of full sunlight. However, studies on the effects of fluctuating light on photosynthesis and plant growth often use fluctuations that do not resemble sunflecks, possibly resulting in irrelevant crop improvement targets. In this review, first, we quantify this mismatch between experiments and reality, showing that most studies measuring light intensities in crop canopies did so too infrequently to capture all sunfleck properties, while studies either simulating dynamic photosynthesis or growing plants under fluctuating light did so using much slower fluctuations than those often encountered in the field. Second, we attempted to estimate the losses of photosynthesis due to sunflecks: using light intensity fluctuations recorded inside a rice canopy at high frequency (100 Hz) on a sunny day, a dynamic photosynthesis model based analysis calculated minimal losses (0.85%–1.24% diurnally; relative to steady-state simulations), suggesting that sunflecks are too frequent, short, and weak to cause substantial losses due to slow dynamics of photosynthesis. We found that the choice of light intensity pattern matters enormously, as estimated losses reached 13% diurnally when using a less realistic light intensity pattern. We also introduce a framework for determining photosynthesis under windflecks based on pulsed light experiments. Thirdly, we present an overview of effects of global climate change on dynamic photosynthesis and crop growth under fluctuating light, concluding that likely, rising [CO2] will benefit photosynthesis under sunflecks, whereas heat, VPD and drought may be detrimental. Finally, we suggest future research directions, noting that new targets for crop improvements under sunflecks will require a much better characterization of sunflecks, their windfleck and cloudfleck components, and their effects on photosynthesis and plant growth.

被忽视的太阳斑特性及其对作物改良的潜在影响
太阳斑在农作物的树冠上随处可见,但它们的特性还没有得到充分的研究。最近的数据表明,在晴朗的日子里,农作物冠层内由风引起的太阳斑(风斑)大约每秒发生两次,幅度约为全日照的10%。然而,在研究波动光对光合作用和植物生长的影响时,经常使用不像太阳斑的波动,这可能导致与作物改良目标不相关。在这篇综述中,首先,我们量化了实验与现实之间的这种不匹配,表明大多数测量作物冠层光强度的研究都很少捕捉到所有的太阳斑特性,而模拟动态光合作用或在波动光下种植植物的研究使用的波动比在田间经常遇到的波动要慢得多。其次,我们试图估计由于太阳斑造成的光合作用损失:利用在晴天记录的水稻冠层内高频率(100 Hz)的光强波动,基于动态光合作用模型的分析计算出最小损失(每天0.85%-1.24%;相对于稳态模拟),表明太阳斑太频繁、太短、太弱,由于光合作用的缓慢动态,不会造成重大损失。我们发现光强模式的选择非常重要,当使用不太现实的光强模式时,估计每天的损失达到13%。我们还介绍了一个基于脉冲光实验的测定风斑下光合作用的框架。第三,我们概述了全球气候变化对波动光下动态光合作用和作物生长的影响,结论是[CO 2]的上升可能有利于日斑下的光合作用,而热量,VPD和干旱可能是有害的。最后,我们提出了未来的研究方向,指出太阳斑下作物改良的新目标将需要更好地表征太阳斑,它们的风斑和云斑成分,以及它们对光合作用和植物生长的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书