Ke Deng, Steve Lut Ting Lam, Julie Choi Ka Kung, Lijian Jin, Maurizio Tonetti, George Pelekos
{"title":"The External Validation Trial on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Self‐Reported Measures of Periodontal Disease","authors":"Ke Deng, Steve Lut Ting Lam, Julie Choi Ka Kung, Lijian Jin, Maurizio Tonetti, George Pelekos","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.70208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim To externally validate a previously developed time‐ and cost‐effective screening tool for screening subjects with different periodontal conditions by combining various questionnaires, demographic data and lifestyle factors, providing a reliable basis for future efforts to promote public awareness of oral/periodontal health and early periodontal care. Methods The study consisted of a self‐administered questionnaire and a full‐mouth periodontal and radiographic examination. External validation was conducted using a representative cohort systematically and randomly selected from the general population of Hong Kong. A modified questionnaire originally proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/American Academy of Periodontology (CDC/AAP) was given to participants, and the results were tested against the periodontal case definition based on the 2017 World Workshop Classification of Periodontal Diseases. Accuracy was analysed by multivariate logistic regression, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated. Results A total of 384 subjects participated in this validation study, including individuals with periodontal health (6.2%), gingivitis (19.3%), Stage I/II periodontitis (19.3%) and Stage III/IV periodontitis (55.2%). The screening model, which integrated the CDC/AAP questionnaire with demographic and lifestyle factors, showed the best performance in detecting both periodontitis and severe periodontitis. For periodontitis detection, the model achieved an AUROC of 0.888, with a sensitivity of 91.1% and specificity of 90.0%. For Stage III/IV periodontitis, it showed an AUROC of 0.899, with a sensitivity of 88.8% and specificity of 77.2%. Conclusion This externally validated model demonstrates acceptable accuracy in identifying periodontitis patients in independent populations, supporting its potential applicability across diverse community settings.","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.70208","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim To externally validate a previously developed time‐ and cost‐effective screening tool for screening subjects with different periodontal conditions by combining various questionnaires, demographic data and lifestyle factors, providing a reliable basis for future efforts to promote public awareness of oral/periodontal health and early periodontal care. Methods The study consisted of a self‐administered questionnaire and a full‐mouth periodontal and radiographic examination. External validation was conducted using a representative cohort systematically and randomly selected from the general population of Hong Kong. A modified questionnaire originally proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/American Academy of Periodontology (CDC/AAP) was given to participants, and the results were tested against the periodontal case definition based on the 2017 World Workshop Classification of Periodontal Diseases. Accuracy was analysed by multivariate logistic regression, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated. Results A total of 384 subjects participated in this validation study, including individuals with periodontal health (6.2%), gingivitis (19.3%), Stage I/II periodontitis (19.3%) and Stage III/IV periodontitis (55.2%). The screening model, which integrated the CDC/AAP questionnaire with demographic and lifestyle factors, showed the best performance in detecting both periodontitis and severe periodontitis. For periodontitis detection, the model achieved an AUROC of 0.888, with a sensitivity of 91.1% and specificity of 90.0%. For Stage III/IV periodontitis, it showed an AUROC of 0.899, with a sensitivity of 88.8% and specificity of 77.2%. Conclusion This externally validated model demonstrates acceptable accuracy in identifying periodontitis patients in independent populations, supporting its potential applicability across diverse community settings.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology.
The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope.
The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.