{"title":"Forest Conversion Reduces Soil Water Retention in Tropical Rainforest","authors":"Qiaoyan Chen, Siyuan Cheng, Shuting Yu, Xiaowei Guo, Zhongyi Sun, Zhongmin Hu, Licong Dai","doi":"10.1002/ldr.70918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extensive primary forests are being converted to secondary forests and plantations owing to human activities in recent decades, which have substantial effects on soil hydrological processes. However, the potential impact of forest conversion on soil water retention remains poorly understood. In this study, tropical primary forests (PF), secondary forests (SF), and rubber monocultures (RM) converted from tropical primary forests were selected on Hainan Island to examine the variation in soil water retention across three forest types and their controlling factors. We found that the primary forests exhibited significantly greater water retention capacity than secondary forests and rubber monocultures. However, secondary forests showed higher water retention than rubber monocultures in shallow soils but lower in deep soils. Similarly, primary forests demonstrated significantly greater soil water storage capacity than secondary forests and rubber monocultures, but secondary forests and rubber monocultures had obvious seasonal variations, which showed that secondary forests had a higher water storage capacity than rubber monocultures in the rainy season and displayed an opposite pattern in the dry season. The saturated hydraulic conductivity in primary forests was higher than that in secondary forests and rubber monocultures. Furthermore, forest types influenced soil properties, with secondary forests and rubber monocultures showing higher bulk density but lower soil capillary porosity compared with primary forests. Among all factors, soil porosity emerged as the dominant controller of water retention, where total porosity and capillary porosity accounted for 31.49% and 30.61% of variation respectively, while soil bulk density contributed relatively less (12.46%). These findings indicate that the conversion of tropical primary forests to secondary forests and rubber monocultures is detrimental to soil water retention and storage. Our results can provide scientific insights for forest development and management in the tropical rainforest.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70918","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Extensive primary forests are being converted to secondary forests and plantations owing to human activities in recent decades, which have substantial effects on soil hydrological processes. However, the potential impact of forest conversion on soil water retention remains poorly understood. In this study, tropical primary forests (PF), secondary forests (SF), and rubber monocultures (RM) converted from tropical primary forests were selected on Hainan Island to examine the variation in soil water retention across three forest types and their controlling factors. We found that the primary forests exhibited significantly greater water retention capacity than secondary forests and rubber monocultures. However, secondary forests showed higher water retention than rubber monocultures in shallow soils but lower in deep soils. Similarly, primary forests demonstrated significantly greater soil water storage capacity than secondary forests and rubber monocultures, but secondary forests and rubber monocultures had obvious seasonal variations, which showed that secondary forests had a higher water storage capacity than rubber monocultures in the rainy season and displayed an opposite pattern in the dry season. The saturated hydraulic conductivity in primary forests was higher than that in secondary forests and rubber monocultures. Furthermore, forest types influenced soil properties, with secondary forests and rubber monocultures showing higher bulk density but lower soil capillary porosity compared with primary forests. Among all factors, soil porosity emerged as the dominant controller of water retention, where total porosity and capillary porosity accounted for 31.49% and 30.61% of variation respectively, while soil bulk density contributed relatively less (12.46%). These findings indicate that the conversion of tropical primary forests to secondary forests and rubber monocultures is detrimental to soil water retention and storage. Our results can provide scientific insights for forest development and management in the tropical rainforest.
期刊介绍:
Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on:
- what land degradation is;
- what causes land degradation;
- the impacts of land degradation
- the scale of land degradation;
- the history, current status or future trends of land degradation;
- avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation;
- remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land;
- sustainable land management.