Cassava growth and yield in response to rates and methods of biostimulant application

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Crop Science Pub Date : 2026-10-04 DOI:10.1002/csc2.70375
Adalton M. Fernandes, Livia M. P. de Castro, Politon T. P. Guedes, Murillo M. Rezende, Thais C. Paolino, Vitor Rodrigues, Dhonata M. Perfeito, Gabriele F. Campos, Samuel Ferrari
{"title":"Cassava growth and yield in response to rates and methods of biostimulant application","authors":"Adalton M. Fernandes,&nbsp;Livia M. P. de Castro,&nbsp;Politon T. P. Guedes,&nbsp;Murillo M. Rezende,&nbsp;Thais C. Paolino,&nbsp;Vitor Rodrigues,&nbsp;Dhonata M. Perfeito,&nbsp;Gabriele F. Campos,&nbsp;Samuel Ferrari","doi":"10.1002/csc2.70375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biostimulant application is a promising strategy for mitigating stress and enhancing yields in crops such as cassava (<i>Manihot esculenta</i> Crantz). However, the optimal rates and application methods for different cassava cultivars are not yet established. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of the method and rate of biostimulant (Stimulate: indolebutyric acid [0.005%], kinetin [0.009%], and gibberellic acid [0.005%]) application on plant growth and storage root yield of sweet and bitter cassava cultivars. Experiment I used a 2 × 3 × 4 factorial design with four replications to test two sweet cultivars, three application methods, and four biostimulant rates (0−1200 mL ha<sup>−1</sup>). A 2 × 4 factorial design with four replications and four biostimulant rates (0−1000 mL ha<sup>−1</sup>) was used to test two sweet cultivars in Experiment II and two bitter cultivars in Experiment III. Biostimulant application under field conditions had limited and cultivar-dependent effects on cassava storage root development. Foliar spraying on the mother plant or stem cutting immersion was not superior to foliar spraying on young plants. Shoot growth responded positively to biostimulant (20%–29% increase) in some sweet cassava cultivars, but this did not translate to yield gains, except for a marginal increase (2.4%–16.9%) in root length or number with rates of 391–902 mL ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>. Therefore, biostimulant use cannot yet be widely adopted as a management strategy to increase cassava storage root yield, and further studies are needed to clarify cultivar- and hormone-group-specific physiological responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":10849,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science","volume":"66 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csc2.70375","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.70375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biostimulant application is a promising strategy for mitigating stress and enhancing yields in crops such as cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). However, the optimal rates and application methods for different cassava cultivars are not yet established. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of the method and rate of biostimulant (Stimulate: indolebutyric acid [0.005%], kinetin [0.009%], and gibberellic acid [0.005%]) application on plant growth and storage root yield of sweet and bitter cassava cultivars. Experiment I used a 2 × 3 × 4 factorial design with four replications to test two sweet cultivars, three application methods, and four biostimulant rates (0−1200 mL ha−1). A 2 × 4 factorial design with four replications and four biostimulant rates (0−1000 mL ha−1) was used to test two sweet cultivars in Experiment II and two bitter cultivars in Experiment III. Biostimulant application under field conditions had limited and cultivar-dependent effects on cassava storage root development. Foliar spraying on the mother plant or stem cutting immersion was not superior to foliar spraying on young plants. Shoot growth responded positively to biostimulant (20%–29% increase) in some sweet cassava cultivars, but this did not translate to yield gains, except for a marginal increase (2.4%–16.9%) in root length or number with rates of 391–902 mL ha−1. Therefore, biostimulant use cannot yet be widely adopted as a management strategy to increase cassava storage root yield, and further studies are needed to clarify cultivar- and hormone-group-specific physiological responses.

木薯生长和产量对生物刺激素用量和施用方法的响应
在木薯等作物中,生物刺激素的应用是一种很有前途的缓解胁迫和提高产量的策略。然而,不同木薯品种的最佳施用量和施用方法尚未确定。本研究旨在评价生物刺激素(刺激:吲哚丁酸[0.005%]、动素[0.009%]和赤霉素[0.005%])的施用方式和用量对甜、苦木薯品种植株生长和贮藏根产量的影响。试验1采用2 × 3 × 4的因子设计,共4个重复,试验了2个甜品种、3种施用方法和4种生物刺激剂量(0 ~ 1200 mL ha - 1)。试验2采用2 × 4因子设计,4个重复,4种生物刺激率(0 ~ 1000 mL ha−1),试验2采用甜型品种,试验3采用苦型品种。在田间条件下施用生物刺激素对木薯贮藏根发育的影响有限且依赖于品种。母株叶面喷施或茎段浸施均不优于幼株叶面喷施。在一些甜木薯品种中,芽部生长对生物刺激剂有积极反应(增加20%-29%),但这并没有转化为产量的增加,除了根长或根数的边际增加(2.4%-16.9%),增幅为391-902 mL ha−1。因此,生物刺激素的使用还不能被广泛采用作为一种管理策略来提高木薯储存根产量,需要进一步的研究来阐明品种和激素组特异性的生理反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop Science
Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in Crop Science are of interest to researchers, policy makers, educators, and practitioners. The scope of articles in Crop Science includes crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology and metabolism; crop ecology, production, and management; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazing land ecology and management; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; germplasm collections and their use; and biomedical, health beneficial, and nutritionally enhanced plants. Crop Science publishes thematic collections of articles across its scope and includes topical Review and Interpretation, and Perspectives articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书