Promoting healthy families: a three‐arm randomized controlled trial of Triple P and Circle of Security–Parenting versus treatment‐as‐usual for families with young children (2–6 years)
Andrea Gonzalez, G. J. Melendez‐Torres, Divya Joshi, Charlene Attard, Amber D. Rieder, Natalie Harvey‐Younis, Jean Eric Tarride, Leslie Atkinson, Susan M. Jack, Melissa Kimber, Teresa Bennett, Jazzmin Demy, Harriet L. MacMillan
{"title":"Promoting healthy families: a three‐arm randomized controlled trial of Triple P and Circle of Security–Parenting versus treatment‐as‐usual for families with young children (2–6 years)","authors":"Andrea Gonzalez, G. J. Melendez‐Torres, Divya Joshi, Charlene Attard, Amber D. Rieder, Natalie Harvey‐Younis, Jean Eric Tarride, Leslie Atkinson, Susan M. Jack, Melissa Kimber, Teresa Bennett, Jazzmin Demy, Harriet L. MacMillan","doi":"10.1111/jcpp.70228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Parenting programs grounded in social learning (SL) and attachment theory are widely implemented, yet few trials have directly compared their effects across multiple parenting domains in community contexts. This study examined the relative effectiveness of an SL‐based program (Triple P – Level 4 Group) and an attachment‐based program (Circle of Security – Parenting, COS‐P) against treatment‐as‐usual (TAU) when delivered online through community agencies. Methods A three‐arm randomized controlled trial was conducted across four community organizations in Ontario, Canada. Caregivers of children aged 2–6 years ( <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 502) were randomized (1:1:1) to Triple P, COS‐P, or TAU. Primary outcomes were child behavioral difficulties (SDQ‐Total) and parental overreactivity with post‐intervention, 6‐, and 12‐month follow‐up. Secondary outcomes included parental attributions, parenting stress, and caregiver mental health. Analyses followed an intention‐to‐treat framework using mixed‐effects models (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT04702191). Results Relative to TAU, Triple P demonstrated significant short‐term reductions in emotional symptoms and conduct problems, and immediate improvements in hostile and helpless parenting and anxiety; however, most between‐group effects did not persist beyond post‐intervention. Effects on total child behavior problems at 12 months were no longer significant after correction for multiple testing. Improvements in parental attributions were sustained at 12 months. COS‐P differed from TAU on only one outcome, at one time point. Within‐group improvements in child behavior, dysfunctional parenting, and caregiver mood were observed in TAU, with COS‐P and Triple P showing similar trends. Exploratory analyses suggested broader benefits for Triple P relative to COS‐P. Conclusions Triple P demonstrated selective short‐term benefits relative to TAU across child behavioral and parenting outcomes, with sustained effects limited to parental attributions. COS‐P showed no measurable effects relative to TAU. These findings highlight the importance of behavioral management and self‐regulation components and point to the need for further research examining contextual moderators, maintenance strategies, and sustainable delivery approaches, including digital formats.","PeriodicalId":187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.70228","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Parenting programs grounded in social learning (SL) and attachment theory are widely implemented, yet few trials have directly compared their effects across multiple parenting domains in community contexts. This study examined the relative effectiveness of an SL‐based program (Triple P – Level 4 Group) and an attachment‐based program (Circle of Security – Parenting, COS‐P) against treatment‐as‐usual (TAU) when delivered online through community agencies. Methods A three‐arm randomized controlled trial was conducted across four community organizations in Ontario, Canada. Caregivers of children aged 2–6 years ( N = 502) were randomized (1:1:1) to Triple P, COS‐P, or TAU. Primary outcomes were child behavioral difficulties (SDQ‐Total) and parental overreactivity with post‐intervention, 6‐, and 12‐month follow‐up. Secondary outcomes included parental attributions, parenting stress, and caregiver mental health. Analyses followed an intention‐to‐treat framework using mixed‐effects models (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT04702191). Results Relative to TAU, Triple P demonstrated significant short‐term reductions in emotional symptoms and conduct problems, and immediate improvements in hostile and helpless parenting and anxiety; however, most between‐group effects did not persist beyond post‐intervention. Effects on total child behavior problems at 12 months were no longer significant after correction for multiple testing. Improvements in parental attributions were sustained at 12 months. COS‐P differed from TAU on only one outcome, at one time point. Within‐group improvements in child behavior, dysfunctional parenting, and caregiver mood were observed in TAU, with COS‐P and Triple P showing similar trends. Exploratory analyses suggested broader benefits for Triple P relative to COS‐P. Conclusions Triple P demonstrated selective short‐term benefits relative to TAU across child behavioral and parenting outcomes, with sustained effects limited to parental attributions. COS‐P showed no measurable effects relative to TAU. These findings highlight the importance of behavioral management and self‐regulation components and point to the need for further research examining contextual moderators, maintenance strategies, and sustainable delivery approaches, including digital formats.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (JCPP) is a highly regarded international publication that focuses on the fields of child and adolescent psychology and psychiatry. It is recognized for publishing top-tier, clinically relevant research across various disciplines related to these areas. JCPP has a broad global readership and covers a diverse range of topics, including:
Epidemiology: Studies on the prevalence and distribution of mental health issues in children and adolescents.
Diagnosis: Research on the identification and classification of childhood disorders.
Treatments: Psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological interventions for child and adolescent mental health.
Behavior and Cognition: Studies on the behavioral and cognitive aspects of childhood disorders.
Neuroscience and Neurobiology: Research on the neural and biological underpinnings of child mental health.
Genetics: Genetic factors contributing to the development of childhood disorders.
JCPP serves as a platform for integrating empirical research, clinical studies, and high-quality reviews from diverse perspectives, theoretical viewpoints, and disciplines. This interdisciplinary approach is a key feature of the journal, as it fosters a comprehensive understanding of child and adolescent mental health.
The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry is published 12 times a year and is affiliated with the Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (ACAMH), which supports the journal's mission to advance knowledge and practice in the field of child and adolescent mental health.