Promoting healthy families: a three‐arm randomized controlled trial of Triple P and Circle of Security–Parenting versus treatment‐as‐usual for families with young children (2–6 years)

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Andrea Gonzalez, G. J. Melendez‐Torres, Divya Joshi, Charlene Attard, Amber D. Rieder, Natalie Harvey‐Younis, Jean Eric Tarride, Leslie Atkinson, Susan M. Jack, Melissa Kimber, Teresa Bennett, Jazzmin Demy, Harriet L. MacMillan
{"title":"Promoting healthy families: a three‐arm randomized controlled trial of Triple P and Circle of Security–Parenting versus treatment‐as‐usual for families with young children (2–6 years)","authors":"Andrea Gonzalez, G. J. Melendez‐Torres, Divya Joshi, Charlene Attard, Amber D. Rieder, Natalie Harvey‐Younis, Jean Eric Tarride, Leslie Atkinson, Susan M. Jack, Melissa Kimber, Teresa Bennett, Jazzmin Demy, Harriet L. MacMillan","doi":"10.1111/jcpp.70228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Parenting programs grounded in social learning (SL) and attachment theory are widely implemented, yet few trials have directly compared their effects across multiple parenting domains in community contexts. This study examined the relative effectiveness of an SL‐based program (Triple P – Level 4 Group) and an attachment‐based program (Circle of Security – Parenting, COS‐P) against treatment‐as‐usual (TAU) when delivered online through community agencies. Methods A three‐arm randomized controlled trial was conducted across four community organizations in Ontario, Canada. Caregivers of children aged 2–6 years ( <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 502) were randomized (1:1:1) to Triple P, COS‐P, or TAU. Primary outcomes were child behavioral difficulties (SDQ‐Total) and parental overreactivity with post‐intervention, 6‐, and 12‐month follow‐up. Secondary outcomes included parental attributions, parenting stress, and caregiver mental health. Analyses followed an intention‐to‐treat framework using mixed‐effects models (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT04702191). Results Relative to TAU, Triple P demonstrated significant short‐term reductions in emotional symptoms and conduct problems, and immediate improvements in hostile and helpless parenting and anxiety; however, most between‐group effects did not persist beyond post‐intervention. Effects on total child behavior problems at 12 months were no longer significant after correction for multiple testing. Improvements in parental attributions were sustained at 12 months. COS‐P differed from TAU on only one outcome, at one time point. Within‐group improvements in child behavior, dysfunctional parenting, and caregiver mood were observed in TAU, with COS‐P and Triple P showing similar trends. Exploratory analyses suggested broader benefits for Triple P relative to COS‐P. Conclusions Triple P demonstrated selective short‐term benefits relative to TAU across child behavioral and parenting outcomes, with sustained effects limited to parental attributions. COS‐P showed no measurable effects relative to TAU. These findings highlight the importance of behavioral management and self‐regulation components and point to the need for further research examining contextual moderators, maintenance strategies, and sustainable delivery approaches, including digital formats.","PeriodicalId":187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.70228","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Parenting programs grounded in social learning (SL) and attachment theory are widely implemented, yet few trials have directly compared their effects across multiple parenting domains in community contexts. This study examined the relative effectiveness of an SL‐based program (Triple P – Level 4 Group) and an attachment‐based program (Circle of Security – Parenting, COS‐P) against treatment‐as‐usual (TAU) when delivered online through community agencies. Methods A three‐arm randomized controlled trial was conducted across four community organizations in Ontario, Canada. Caregivers of children aged 2–6 years ( N = 502) were randomized (1:1:1) to Triple P, COS‐P, or TAU. Primary outcomes were child behavioral difficulties (SDQ‐Total) and parental overreactivity with post‐intervention, 6‐, and 12‐month follow‐up. Secondary outcomes included parental attributions, parenting stress, and caregiver mental health. Analyses followed an intention‐to‐treat framework using mixed‐effects models (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT04702191). Results Relative to TAU, Triple P demonstrated significant short‐term reductions in emotional symptoms and conduct problems, and immediate improvements in hostile and helpless parenting and anxiety; however, most between‐group effects did not persist beyond post‐intervention. Effects on total child behavior problems at 12 months were no longer significant after correction for multiple testing. Improvements in parental attributions were sustained at 12 months. COS‐P differed from TAU on only one outcome, at one time point. Within‐group improvements in child behavior, dysfunctional parenting, and caregiver mood were observed in TAU, with COS‐P and Triple P showing similar trends. Exploratory analyses suggested broader benefits for Triple P relative to COS‐P. Conclusions Triple P demonstrated selective short‐term benefits relative to TAU across child behavioral and parenting outcomes, with sustained effects limited to parental attributions. COS‐P showed no measurable effects relative to TAU. These findings highlight the importance of behavioral management and self‐regulation components and point to the need for further research examining contextual moderators, maintenance strategies, and sustainable delivery approaches, including digital formats.
促进健康家庭:一项三组随机对照试验:在有幼儿(2-6岁)的家庭中,3p和安全圈与常规治疗相比
基于社会学习(SL)和依恋理论的育儿计划被广泛实施,但很少有试验直接比较它们在社区背景下跨多个育儿领域的效果。本研究考察了一个基于SL的项目(Triple P - Level 4 Group)和一个基于依恋的项目(安全圈-育儿,COS - P)在通过社区机构在线提供时相对于常规治疗(TAU)的有效性。方法在加拿大安大略省的四个社区组织中进行了一项三组随机对照试验。2-6岁儿童的照顾者(N = 502)按1:1:1的比例随机分配到Triple P、COS - P或TAU组。在干预后、6个月和12个月的随访中,主要结局是儿童行为困难(SDQ - Total)和父母过度反应。次要结局包括父母归因、父母压力和照顾者心理健康。分析遵循意向-治疗框架,采用混合效应模型(ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT04702191)。结果:与TAU相比,Triple P在短期内显著减少了情绪症状和行为问题,并立即改善了敌意和无助的育儿和焦虑;然而,大多数组间效应并没有持续到干预后。在多重测试校正后,对12个月儿童总行为问题的影响不再显著。父母归因的改善持续到12个月。在一个时间点,COS - P仅在一个结果上与TAU不同。在TAU组内,观察到儿童行为、功能失调的养育和照顾者情绪的改善,COS - P和Triple - P也显示出类似的趋势。探索性分析表明,相对于COS - P, 3p有更广泛的益处。结论:相对于TAU, 3p在儿童行为和父母教养方面表现出选择性的短期效益,持续效应仅限于父母归因。COS‐P对TAU没有可测量的影响。这些发现强调了行为管理和自我调节组件的重要性,并指出需要进一步研究上下文调节、维护策略和可持续交付方法,包括数字格式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (JCPP) is a highly regarded international publication that focuses on the fields of child and adolescent psychology and psychiatry. It is recognized for publishing top-tier, clinically relevant research across various disciplines related to these areas. JCPP has a broad global readership and covers a diverse range of topics, including: Epidemiology: Studies on the prevalence and distribution of mental health issues in children and adolescents. Diagnosis: Research on the identification and classification of childhood disorders. Treatments: Psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological interventions for child and adolescent mental health. Behavior and Cognition: Studies on the behavioral and cognitive aspects of childhood disorders. Neuroscience and Neurobiology: Research on the neural and biological underpinnings of child mental health. Genetics: Genetic factors contributing to the development of childhood disorders. JCPP serves as a platform for integrating empirical research, clinical studies, and high-quality reviews from diverse perspectives, theoretical viewpoints, and disciplines. This interdisciplinary approach is a key feature of the journal, as it fosters a comprehensive understanding of child and adolescent mental health. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry is published 12 times a year and is affiliated with the Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (ACAMH), which supports the journal's mission to advance knowledge and practice in the field of child and adolescent mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书