A-271 Standardization of a Single Sterile Urine Collection Tube: Diagnostic Stewardship Applied to the Pre-Analytical Phase

IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Sergio Brasil Tufik, Stephanie Cunha, Caio Filipe Souza, Géssica Silva, Priscila Pereira, Ruana Helena Wenceslau, Leandro Reis, Sergio Tufik, Jussimara Nurmberger, Soraya Andrade
{"title":"A-271 Standardization of a Single Sterile Urine Collection Tube: Diagnostic Stewardship Applied to the Pre-Analytical Phase","authors":"Sergio Brasil Tufik, Stephanie Cunha, Caio Filipe Souza, Géssica Silva, Priscila Pereira, Ruana Helena Wenceslau, Leandro Reis, Sergio Tufik, Jussimara Nurmberger, Soraya Andrade","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvag086.220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Urine tests, including routine urinalysis and culture, are widely used in the diagnosis and monitoring of urinary tract infections. Pre-analytical factors, including specimen collection and container adequacy, play a pivotal role in ensuring analytical accuracy. Since we receive samples already collected, recurrent pre-analytical errors were observed when urine cultures are mistakely collected in non-sterile containers. This workflow failure generates negative consequences, such as pre-analytical waste, additional financial costs, delays in diagnosis and treatment, postponed medical appointments and impact on patient safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of standardized urine specimen collection by adopting a single sterile tube suitable for both urinalysis and culture in urinary samples received at a clinical laboratory in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Methods A total of three outpatient units were selected for the study. As part of a strategy to improve the laboratory process through the replacement of supplies, a standardized sterile collection system was introduced for both routine urinalysis and urine culture. Recollection rates for these tests were compared for each unit located in São Paulo over three distinct periods: (i) Pre-implementation (January-March 2025): two tubes were used—one for routine urinalysis and a separate sterile tube for urine culture. (ii) Implementation (April 2025): the two-tube system was replaced by a single sterile tube. (iii) Post-implementation (May-July 2025): the single tube system was consistently used in all scenarios. Results During the implementation phase, improvements in the process were already noticeable, with reductions in recollection rates associated with the adoption of a single tube. Recollections decreased by 40.6%, 39.2%, and 11.5% in units 1, 2, and 3, respectively. After full consolidation of the new process, recollection rates decreased even further by 97.9%, 78.3%, and 71.6%, respectively, representing a substantial reduction across the evaluated units and overall reduction of 83%. The few inappropriate recollections were possibly related to residual use of non-sterile containers distributed before the change in supplies. Conclusion In healthcare systems where specimen collection is decentralized and frequently performed outside the laboratory, pre-analytical errors represent a major source of diagnostic delay. Standardizing the use of a single sterile container for both routine urinalysis and urine culture aligns with Lean principles and proved to be an effective strategy for reducing recollection rates. Overall, the strategy enhanced laboratory workflow efficiency, increased patient and user satisfaction, and strengthened diagnostic practices with a clear focus on patient safety.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvag086.220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Urine tests, including routine urinalysis and culture, are widely used in the diagnosis and monitoring of urinary tract infections. Pre-analytical factors, including specimen collection and container adequacy, play a pivotal role in ensuring analytical accuracy. Since we receive samples already collected, recurrent pre-analytical errors were observed when urine cultures are mistakely collected in non-sterile containers. This workflow failure generates negative consequences, such as pre-analytical waste, additional financial costs, delays in diagnosis and treatment, postponed medical appointments and impact on patient safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of standardized urine specimen collection by adopting a single sterile tube suitable for both urinalysis and culture in urinary samples received at a clinical laboratory in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Methods A total of three outpatient units were selected for the study. As part of a strategy to improve the laboratory process through the replacement of supplies, a standardized sterile collection system was introduced for both routine urinalysis and urine culture. Recollection rates for these tests were compared for each unit located in São Paulo over three distinct periods: (i) Pre-implementation (January-March 2025): two tubes were used—one for routine urinalysis and a separate sterile tube for urine culture. (ii) Implementation (April 2025): the two-tube system was replaced by a single sterile tube. (iii) Post-implementation (May-July 2025): the single tube system was consistently used in all scenarios. Results During the implementation phase, improvements in the process were already noticeable, with reductions in recollection rates associated with the adoption of a single tube. Recollections decreased by 40.6%, 39.2%, and 11.5% in units 1, 2, and 3, respectively. After full consolidation of the new process, recollection rates decreased even further by 97.9%, 78.3%, and 71.6%, respectively, representing a substantial reduction across the evaluated units and overall reduction of 83%. The few inappropriate recollections were possibly related to residual use of non-sterile containers distributed before the change in supplies. Conclusion In healthcare systems where specimen collection is decentralized and frequently performed outside the laboratory, pre-analytical errors represent a major source of diagnostic delay. Standardizing the use of a single sterile container for both routine urinalysis and urine culture aligns with Lean principles and proved to be an effective strategy for reducing recollection rates. Overall, the strategy enhanced laboratory workflow efficiency, increased patient and user satisfaction, and strengthened diagnostic practices with a clear focus on patient safety.
a -271单个无菌尿液收集管的标准化:应用于分析前阶段的诊断管理
尿检测,包括常规尿分析和培养,广泛用于尿路感染的诊断和监测。分析前因素,包括标本收集和容器充分性,在确保分析准确性方面起着关键作用。由于我们收到的是已经收集的样品,因此当尿液培养物错误地收集在非无菌容器中时,会观察到反复出现的分析前错误。这种工作流程失败会产生负面后果,例如分析前浪费、额外的财务成本、诊断和治疗延误、医疗预约推迟以及对患者安全的影响。本研究的目的是评估标准化尿液标本收集的影响,通过采用单一的无菌管,适用于尿液分析和培养在巴西圣保罗市的临床实验室收到的尿液样本。方法选择3个门诊单位进行研究。作为通过更换用品改善实验室流程的战略的一部分,为常规尿液分析和尿液培养引入了标准化的无菌收集系统。在三个不同时期比较了位于圣保罗的每个单位的这些检测的回忆率:(i)实施前(2025年1月至3月):使用了两根试管——一根用于常规尿液分析,另一根用于尿液培养。(二)实施(2025年4月):双管系统被单管无菌管取代。(iii)实施后(2025年5月- 7月):所有场景均采用单管系统。结果在实施阶段,流程的改进已经很明显,与采用单管相关的回收率降低。单元1、单元2和单元3的回忆分别下降了40.6%、39.2%和11.5%。在完全整合新流程后,召回率进一步下降,分别为97.9%、78.3%和71.6%,在评估单位中大幅降低,总体降低了83%。少数不适当的回忆可能与在供应变化之前分发的非无菌容器的残余使用有关。在标本采集分散且经常在实验室外进行的卫生保健系统中,分析前错误是诊断延误的主要原因。标准化使用单一无菌容器进行常规尿液分析和尿液培养符合精益原则,并被证明是降低回忆率的有效策略。总体而言,该战略提高了实验室工作流程效率,提高了患者和用户满意度,并在明确关注患者安全的情况下加强了诊断实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书