Dmitriy Ruckodanov, Matthew Soto, Peter Lamberg, Esmeralda Ruiz-Garcia, Qinyi Yan, Cesar Gomez, Sahir Gandhi, Mariusz Banaszczyk, Roy Heltsley, Tej Patel
{"title":"A-399 Analytical performance of enzymatic amperometric glucose and creatinine sensors for the Fluxergy multimodal point-of-care platform","authors":"Dmitriy Ruckodanov, Matthew Soto, Peter Lamberg, Esmeralda Ruiz-Garcia, Qinyi Yan, Cesar Gomez, Sahir Gandhi, Mariusz Banaszczyk, Roy Heltsley, Tej Patel","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvag086.324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Point-of-care (POC) metabolic testing requires robust amperometric sensors capable of accurately quantifying clinically relevant analytes across wide concentration ranges while maintaining manufacturability and scalability. Enzymatic amperometric sensing of glucose and creatinine presents challenges related to non-ideal electrode behavior, enzyme kinetics, and matrix effects. This study evaluates the analytical performance of enzymatic glucose and creatinine sensors integrated into a multimodal POC platform with respect to FDA-cleared benchtop reference systems, with an emphasis on calibration, accuracy, and robustness across clinically relevant concentration ranges. Methods Amperometric glucose and creatinine sensors were evaluated using aqueous and biological samples spanning concentrations relevant to intended clinical use (glucose: 20–450 mg/dL; creatinine: 0.3–12 mg/dL). Sensors employed enzyme-based reaction cascades and were tested under controlled assay conditions. Sensor responses were compared against measurements obtained from a Nova Stat Prime Plus reference analyzer. Calibration approaches incorporated data-driven correction methods to account for nonlinear sensor response and electrode-specific variability. Analytical performance was assessed using correlation analysis, bias evaluation, and agreement with established clinical accuracy criteria. Manufacturing reproducibility was evaluated by testing sensors from multiple production batches. Results Both glucose and creatinine sensors demonstrated strong correlation with the reference analyzer across the evaluated concentration ranges in aqueous and biological matrices. Data-driven calibration and correction approaches improved linearity and reduced bias without introducing instability or increased variability. Most tested samples met applicable clinical accuracy expectations (as defined by the 2025 CLIA limits) across the reportable range for both analytes. Sensor performance remained consistent across production batches, indicating acceptable manufacturing reproducibility. Conclusion These results demonstrate that enzymatic amperometric glucose and creatinine sensors can achieve clinically relevant analytical performance on a scalable POC platform when paired with appropriate calibration and correction strategies. The findings support the feasibility of integrating multiple enzymatic assays into a single multimodal POC system and highlight the importance of data-driven approaches for characterizing and mitigating non-ideal electrochemical behavior in practical sensor implementation for diagnostics.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvag086.324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Point-of-care (POC) metabolic testing requires robust amperometric sensors capable of accurately quantifying clinically relevant analytes across wide concentration ranges while maintaining manufacturability and scalability. Enzymatic amperometric sensing of glucose and creatinine presents challenges related to non-ideal electrode behavior, enzyme kinetics, and matrix effects. This study evaluates the analytical performance of enzymatic glucose and creatinine sensors integrated into a multimodal POC platform with respect to FDA-cleared benchtop reference systems, with an emphasis on calibration, accuracy, and robustness across clinically relevant concentration ranges. Methods Amperometric glucose and creatinine sensors were evaluated using aqueous and biological samples spanning concentrations relevant to intended clinical use (glucose: 20–450 mg/dL; creatinine: 0.3–12 mg/dL). Sensors employed enzyme-based reaction cascades and were tested under controlled assay conditions. Sensor responses were compared against measurements obtained from a Nova Stat Prime Plus reference analyzer. Calibration approaches incorporated data-driven correction methods to account for nonlinear sensor response and electrode-specific variability. Analytical performance was assessed using correlation analysis, bias evaluation, and agreement with established clinical accuracy criteria. Manufacturing reproducibility was evaluated by testing sensors from multiple production batches. Results Both glucose and creatinine sensors demonstrated strong correlation with the reference analyzer across the evaluated concentration ranges in aqueous and biological matrices. Data-driven calibration and correction approaches improved linearity and reduced bias without introducing instability or increased variability. Most tested samples met applicable clinical accuracy expectations (as defined by the 2025 CLIA limits) across the reportable range for both analytes. Sensor performance remained consistent across production batches, indicating acceptable manufacturing reproducibility. Conclusion These results demonstrate that enzymatic amperometric glucose and creatinine sensors can achieve clinically relevant analytical performance on a scalable POC platform when paired with appropriate calibration and correction strategies. The findings support the feasibility of integrating multiple enzymatic assays into a single multimodal POC system and highlight the importance of data-driven approaches for characterizing and mitigating non-ideal electrochemical behavior in practical sensor implementation for diagnostics.
护理点(POC)代谢测试需要强大的安培传感器,能够在广泛的浓度范围内准确定量临床相关分析物,同时保持可制造性和可扩展性。葡萄糖和肌酐的酶安培感测提出了与非理想电极行为,酶动力学和基质效应相关的挑战。本研究评估了与fda批准的台式参考系统集成到多模态POC平台中的酶葡萄糖和肌酐传感器的分析性能,重点是在临床相关浓度范围内的校准、准确性和稳健性。方法使用与临床预期使用浓度相关的水和生物样品(葡萄糖:20-450 mg/dL;肌酐:0.3-12 mg/dL)对安培葡萄糖和肌酐传感器进行评估。传感器采用基于酶的反应级联,并在受控的分析条件下进行测试。将传感器响应与Nova Stat Prime Plus参考分析仪获得的测量结果进行比较。校准方法结合了数据驱动的校正方法,以考虑非线性传感器响应和电极特定的可变性。采用相关性分析、偏倚评估和与既定临床准确性标准的一致性来评估分析性能。通过测试来自多个生产批次的传感器来评估制造可重复性。结果葡萄糖和肌酐传感器在水基质和生物基质的评价浓度范围内与参比分析仪表现出很强的相关性。数据驱动的校准和校正方法在不引入不稳定性或增加可变性的情况下改善了线性和减少了偏差。大多数测试样品在两种分析物的可报告范围内满足适用的临床准确性期望(由2025年CLIA限值定义)。传感器性能在生产批次之间保持一致,表明可接受的制造再现性。结论在适当的校准和校正策略的配合下,酶促电流型葡萄糖和肌酐传感器可以在可扩展的POC平台上获得临床相关的分析性能。研究结果支持了将多种酶分析集成到单一多模态POC系统中的可行性,并强调了数据驱动方法在实际传感器诊断中表征和减轻非理想电化学行为的重要性。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM).
The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics.
In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology.
The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.