A-200 Advancing Parvovirus B19 Detection: A Fully Automated Solution for Today’s Clinical Demands

IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Dat Vo, Greg Feitl, Daniela Santtelia, Jennifer Cheeseman, Ashli Rode
{"title":"A-200 Advancing Parvovirus B19 Detection: A Fully Automated Solution for Today’s Clinical Demands","authors":"Dat Vo, Greg Feitl, Daniela Santtelia, Jennifer Cheeseman, Ashli Rode","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvag086.161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Recent increases in confirmed parvovirus B19 activity in the United States—including a multi state outbreak reported between late 2024 and early 2025—have heightened clinical demand for rapid, reliable serologic testing to distinguish acute from past infection. This need is especially critical for pregnant individuals and immunocompromised patients, where timely identification of acute parvovirus B19 infection directly informs clinical management. Despite this increased disease burden, currently FDA cleared diagnostic options for parvovirus B19 IgM rely on historical, manually performed ELISA methods. These legacy methods require substantial hands on time, manual pipetting steps, batch dependent workflow constraints, and extended turnaround times that strain laboratory operations during periods of elevated test volume. Methods To address these challenges, the LIAISON® Biotrin Parvovirus B19 IgM Plus assay was clinically evaluated as a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) for use on the LIAISON® XL analyzer, complementing the FDA cleared LIAISON® Parvovirus B19 IgG assay. The U.S. clinical validation study included 1,247 serum specimens: 356 from pregnant individuals representing all trimesters, and 891 from patients for whom a physician ordered parvovirus B19 IgM testing during the confirmed outbreak period. Results Across both cohorts, the automated IgM assay demonstrated strong agreement with the predicate ELISA method, achieving a positive percent agreement of 96.3% and a negative percent agreement of 99.7%). In addition, the assay exhibits excellent intra-site reproducibility, supporting its robustness across routine clinical laboratory conditions. Conclusion These data underscore the value of transitioning parvovirus B19 serologic testing from manual ELISA workflows to a fully automated IgG + IgM testing solution. Automation reduces hands on labor, improves standardization, and provides on demand scalability during outbreak surges. The LIAISON® Parvovirus B19 IgM Plus assay offers clinical laboratories a reliable, operationally efficient method for detecting acute parvovirus B19 infection in both routine and high demand settings.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvag086.161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Recent increases in confirmed parvovirus B19 activity in the United States—including a multi state outbreak reported between late 2024 and early 2025—have heightened clinical demand for rapid, reliable serologic testing to distinguish acute from past infection. This need is especially critical for pregnant individuals and immunocompromised patients, where timely identification of acute parvovirus B19 infection directly informs clinical management. Despite this increased disease burden, currently FDA cleared diagnostic options for parvovirus B19 IgM rely on historical, manually performed ELISA methods. These legacy methods require substantial hands on time, manual pipetting steps, batch dependent workflow constraints, and extended turnaround times that strain laboratory operations during periods of elevated test volume. Methods To address these challenges, the LIAISON® Biotrin Parvovirus B19 IgM Plus assay was clinically evaluated as a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) for use on the LIAISON® XL analyzer, complementing the FDA cleared LIAISON® Parvovirus B19 IgG assay. The U.S. clinical validation study included 1,247 serum specimens: 356 from pregnant individuals representing all trimesters, and 891 from patients for whom a physician ordered parvovirus B19 IgM testing during the confirmed outbreak period. Results Across both cohorts, the automated IgM assay demonstrated strong agreement with the predicate ELISA method, achieving a positive percent agreement of 96.3% and a negative percent agreement of 99.7%). In addition, the assay exhibits excellent intra-site reproducibility, supporting its robustness across routine clinical laboratory conditions. Conclusion These data underscore the value of transitioning parvovirus B19 serologic testing from manual ELISA workflows to a fully automated IgG + IgM testing solution. Automation reduces hands on labor, improves standardization, and provides on demand scalability during outbreak surges. The LIAISON® Parvovirus B19 IgM Plus assay offers clinical laboratories a reliable, operationally efficient method for detecting acute parvovirus B19 infection in both routine and high demand settings.
A-200推进细小病毒B19检测:满足当今临床需求的全自动解决方案
背景:最近在美国确诊的细小病毒B19活性有所增加,包括在2024年底至2025年初报告的多州暴发,这增加了对快速、可靠的血清学检测的临床需求,以区分急性感染和过去感染。这一需求对孕妇和免疫功能低下患者尤其重要,因为在这些人群中,及时发现急性细小病毒B19感染可直接为临床管理提供信息。尽管这种疾病负担增加,但目前FDA批准了细小病毒B19 IgM的诊断选择依赖于历史上手动执行的ELISA方法。这些传统方法需要大量的人手,手动移液步骤,依赖于批的工作流程约束,以及在测试量增加期间延长的周转时间,这些都使实验室操作紧张。为了应对这些挑战,我们将LIAISON®Biotrin Parvovirus B19 IgM Plus检测作为一种全自动化学发光免疫测定(CLIA)在LIAISON®XL分析仪上进行临床评估,以补充FDA批准的LIAISON®Parvovirus B19 IgG检测。美国临床验证研究包括1247份血清样本:356份来自所有妊娠期的孕妇,891份来自确诊爆发期间医生要求进行细小病毒B19 IgM检测的患者。结果在两个队列中,自动化IgM分析与谓词ELISA方法表现出很强的一致性,达到96.3%的阳性一致性和99.7%的阴性一致性。此外,该分析具有出色的位点内重现性,支持其在常规临床实验室条件下的稳健性。结论这些数据强调了将细小病毒B19血清学检测从手工ELISA工作流程转变为全自动IgG + IgM检测方案的价值。自动化减少了人工操作,提高了标准化,并在爆发激增期间提供了随需应变的可伸缩性。联络®细小病毒B19 IgM Plus检测为临床实验室在常规和高需求环境中检测急性细小病毒B19感染提供了可靠、操作高效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书