Dat Vo, Greg Feitl, Daniela Santtelia, Jennifer Cheeseman, Ashli Rode
{"title":"A-200 Advancing Parvovirus B19 Detection: A Fully Automated Solution for Today’s Clinical Demands","authors":"Dat Vo, Greg Feitl, Daniela Santtelia, Jennifer Cheeseman, Ashli Rode","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvag086.161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Recent increases in confirmed parvovirus B19 activity in the United States—including a multi state outbreak reported between late 2024 and early 2025—have heightened clinical demand for rapid, reliable serologic testing to distinguish acute from past infection. This need is especially critical for pregnant individuals and immunocompromised patients, where timely identification of acute parvovirus B19 infection directly informs clinical management. Despite this increased disease burden, currently FDA cleared diagnostic options for parvovirus B19 IgM rely on historical, manually performed ELISA methods. These legacy methods require substantial hands on time, manual pipetting steps, batch dependent workflow constraints, and extended turnaround times that strain laboratory operations during periods of elevated test volume. Methods To address these challenges, the LIAISON® Biotrin Parvovirus B19 IgM Plus assay was clinically evaluated as a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) for use on the LIAISON® XL analyzer, complementing the FDA cleared LIAISON® Parvovirus B19 IgG assay. The U.S. clinical validation study included 1,247 serum specimens: 356 from pregnant individuals representing all trimesters, and 891 from patients for whom a physician ordered parvovirus B19 IgM testing during the confirmed outbreak period. Results Across both cohorts, the automated IgM assay demonstrated strong agreement with the predicate ELISA method, achieving a positive percent agreement of 96.3% and a negative percent agreement of 99.7%). In addition, the assay exhibits excellent intra-site reproducibility, supporting its robustness across routine clinical laboratory conditions. Conclusion These data underscore the value of transitioning parvovirus B19 serologic testing from manual ELISA workflows to a fully automated IgG + IgM testing solution. Automation reduces hands on labor, improves standardization, and provides on demand scalability during outbreak surges. The LIAISON® Parvovirus B19 IgM Plus assay offers clinical laboratories a reliable, operationally efficient method for detecting acute parvovirus B19 infection in both routine and high demand settings.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvag086.161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Recent increases in confirmed parvovirus B19 activity in the United States—including a multi state outbreak reported between late 2024 and early 2025—have heightened clinical demand for rapid, reliable serologic testing to distinguish acute from past infection. This need is especially critical for pregnant individuals and immunocompromised patients, where timely identification of acute parvovirus B19 infection directly informs clinical management. Despite this increased disease burden, currently FDA cleared diagnostic options for parvovirus B19 IgM rely on historical, manually performed ELISA methods. These legacy methods require substantial hands on time, manual pipetting steps, batch dependent workflow constraints, and extended turnaround times that strain laboratory operations during periods of elevated test volume. Methods To address these challenges, the LIAISON® Biotrin Parvovirus B19 IgM Plus assay was clinically evaluated as a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) for use on the LIAISON® XL analyzer, complementing the FDA cleared LIAISON® Parvovirus B19 IgG assay. The U.S. clinical validation study included 1,247 serum specimens: 356 from pregnant individuals representing all trimesters, and 891 from patients for whom a physician ordered parvovirus B19 IgM testing during the confirmed outbreak period. Results Across both cohorts, the automated IgM assay demonstrated strong agreement with the predicate ELISA method, achieving a positive percent agreement of 96.3% and a negative percent agreement of 99.7%). In addition, the assay exhibits excellent intra-site reproducibility, supporting its robustness across routine clinical laboratory conditions. Conclusion These data underscore the value of transitioning parvovirus B19 serologic testing from manual ELISA workflows to a fully automated IgG + IgM testing solution. Automation reduces hands on labor, improves standardization, and provides on demand scalability during outbreak surges. The LIAISON® Parvovirus B19 IgM Plus assay offers clinical laboratories a reliable, operationally efficient method for detecting acute parvovirus B19 infection in both routine and high demand settings.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM).
The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics.
In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology.
The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.