B-042 Performance evaluation of Atellica IM infectious disease assays with dried blood spot sample

IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Sai Patibandla, Krishna Singh, Katie Ann Paden
{"title":"B-042 Performance evaluation of Atellica IM infectious disease assays with dried blood spot sample","authors":"Sai Patibandla, Krishna Singh, Katie Ann Paden","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvag086.371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Dried Blood Spots (DBS) have been used for screening of inherited metabolic disorders in newborns and infectious disease in key populations (intravenous drug users, homeless, and sex workers) due to ease of blood collection and transportation. Siemens Healthineers Atellica IM CHIV, HBsII, and HBcT2 assays are commercially available fully automated assays for the diagnosis of HIV and HBV infection in serum and plasma. To enhance widespread detection of HIV and HBV infected individuals, performance of Atellica IM CHIV, and HBcT2 assays is evaluated with DBS. Methods To determine optimal conditions for use of DBS, blood spot drying time, punch size, and elution conditions (buffer, time, and mixing method) studies were conducted. The initial studies were conducted with dried plasma spots and subsequently verified with blood spots. For Atellica IM assays performance evaluation with DBS, blood was collected from normal donors and spiked with respective analytes. The Whatman 903 filter card was spotted with 50 ul of spiked or unspiked blood from each donor. The remaining blood was centrifuged to obtain plasma. For DBS elution, the punched spots were eluted in selected elution buffer. The DBS eluates and matched plasma were tested with Atellica IM CHIV, and HBcT2 assays using standard assay parameters. The results were analyzed using assay cut-off as per IFU. The results were also analyzed with DBS specific cut-off derived from results obtained with unspiked DBS samples. Results DBS drying time >2 hours did not show improvement in analyte recovery. For DBS elution, testing of 1-3 spots in 500 µl elution buffer showed increase in recovery with increasing spots. When 6 mm and 12 mm punches from 2 spots were compared, the latter provided enhanced recovery. Among tested conditions, elution of 2 spots in 500 ul of Atellica IM Wash buffer at room temperature with shaking for 2 hours showed optimal recovery. Using these conditions, DBS and plasma of unspiked blood from 27–30 donors were tested with Atellica IM CHIV, and HBcT2 assays. All DBS samples and matched plasma were nonreactive with all 3 assays using respective commercial cut-off (1 index). When DBS and plasma of HIV-1, HIV-2, Group ‘O’ and p24 spiked blood were tested with CHIV assay, DBS showed 5 to 10-fold lower dilutional sensitivity compared to plasma using commercial cut-off. Reduced dilutional sensitivity was observed in DBS with HBsII assay (8-fold lower) and HBcT2 assay (20-fold lower) with commercial cut-offs. The results from unspiked donors were used to calculate a DBS specific cut-off (Avg + >=7SD). With DBS specific cut-offs (CHIV-0.51 index, HBsII-0.31 Index, HBcT2-0.46 Index), all the unspiked donor DBS samples were nonreactive with all 3 assays showing 100% specificity. DBS dilutional sensitivity was significantly improved with DBS specific cut-offs. The HBsII and HBcT2 assays showed dilutional sensitivity 2-fold lower and CHIV assay showed 2-5-fold lower compared to plasma. Conclusions These results demonstrate that comparable performance of Atellica IM CHIV, and HBcT2 assays with DBS can be achieved. In Development. Not commercially available. Future availability cannot be guaranteed.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvag086.371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Dried Blood Spots (DBS) have been used for screening of inherited metabolic disorders in newborns and infectious disease in key populations (intravenous drug users, homeless, and sex workers) due to ease of blood collection and transportation. Siemens Healthineers Atellica IM CHIV, HBsII, and HBcT2 assays are commercially available fully automated assays for the diagnosis of HIV and HBV infection in serum and plasma. To enhance widespread detection of HIV and HBV infected individuals, performance of Atellica IM CHIV, and HBcT2 assays is evaluated with DBS. Methods To determine optimal conditions for use of DBS, blood spot drying time, punch size, and elution conditions (buffer, time, and mixing method) studies were conducted. The initial studies were conducted with dried plasma spots and subsequently verified with blood spots. For Atellica IM assays performance evaluation with DBS, blood was collected from normal donors and spiked with respective analytes. The Whatman 903 filter card was spotted with 50 ul of spiked or unspiked blood from each donor. The remaining blood was centrifuged to obtain plasma. For DBS elution, the punched spots were eluted in selected elution buffer. The DBS eluates and matched plasma were tested with Atellica IM CHIV, and HBcT2 assays using standard assay parameters. The results were analyzed using assay cut-off as per IFU. The results were also analyzed with DBS specific cut-off derived from results obtained with unspiked DBS samples. Results DBS drying time >2 hours did not show improvement in analyte recovery. For DBS elution, testing of 1-3 spots in 500 µl elution buffer showed increase in recovery with increasing spots. When 6 mm and 12 mm punches from 2 spots were compared, the latter provided enhanced recovery. Among tested conditions, elution of 2 spots in 500 ul of Atellica IM Wash buffer at room temperature with shaking for 2 hours showed optimal recovery. Using these conditions, DBS and plasma of unspiked blood from 27–30 donors were tested with Atellica IM CHIV, and HBcT2 assays. All DBS samples and matched plasma were nonreactive with all 3 assays using respective commercial cut-off (1 index). When DBS and plasma of HIV-1, HIV-2, Group ‘O’ and p24 spiked blood were tested with CHIV assay, DBS showed 5 to 10-fold lower dilutional sensitivity compared to plasma using commercial cut-off. Reduced dilutional sensitivity was observed in DBS with HBsII assay (8-fold lower) and HBcT2 assay (20-fold lower) with commercial cut-offs. The results from unspiked donors were used to calculate a DBS specific cut-off (Avg + >=7SD). With DBS specific cut-offs (CHIV-0.51 index, HBsII-0.31 Index, HBcT2-0.46 Index), all the unspiked donor DBS samples were nonreactive with all 3 assays showing 100% specificity. DBS dilutional sensitivity was significantly improved with DBS specific cut-offs. The HBsII and HBcT2 assays showed dilutional sensitivity 2-fold lower and CHIV assay showed 2-5-fold lower compared to plasma. Conclusions These results demonstrate that comparable performance of Atellica IM CHIV, and HBcT2 assays with DBS can be achieved. In Development. Not commercially available. Future availability cannot be guaranteed.
B-042干血斑样Atellica IM传染病检测性能评价
由于血液采集和运输方便,干血点(DBS)已被用于筛查新生儿的遗传性代谢紊乱和关键人群(静脉吸毒者、无家可归者和性工作者)的传染病。西门子Healthineers Atellica IM CHIV, HBsII和HBcT2检测是市售全自动检测血清和血浆中HIV和HBV感染的方法。为了加强对HIV和HBV感染者的广泛检测,Atellica IM CHIV和HBcT2检测的性能用DBS进行了评估。方法对DBS的最佳使用条件、血斑干燥时间、冲孔大小、洗脱条件(缓冲液、时间和混合方法)进行研究。最初的研究是用干燥的血浆斑点进行的,随后用血斑点进行验证。对于使用DBS进行Atellica IM分析的性能评估,从正常献血者采集血液并加入相应的分析物。在Whatman 903过滤卡上发现了每个献血者的50毫升加了针或未加针的血液。将剩余的血液离心以获得血浆。DBS洗脱时,将穿孔斑点在选定的洗脱液中洗脱。DBS洗脱液和匹配血浆采用Atellica IM CHIV和HBcT2检测,采用标准检测参数。根据IFU使用测定截止值对结果进行分析。结果还分析了DBS特异性截止从结果得到的未加标DBS样品。结果DBS干燥时间;2小时后分析物回收率未见改善。对于DBS洗脱,在500µl洗脱缓冲液中测试1-3个斑点,回收率随着斑点的增加而增加。当比较来自2个点的6mm和12mm冲头时,后者提供了更高的采收率。在试验条件中,2个斑点在500 ul Atellica IM Wash缓冲液中室温振荡洗脱2小时,回收率最佳。在这些条件下,对27-30名献血者的DBS和血浆进行了Atellica IM - chv和HBcT2检测。使用各自的商业截止值(1个指标),所有DBS样品和匹配血浆在所有3种检测中均无反应。当DBS和HIV-1、HIV-2、O组和p24加标血的血浆用CHIV法检测时,DBS的稀释敏感性比使用商业截止值的血浆低5 ~ 10倍。采用HBsII法(降低8倍)和HBcT2法(降低20倍)进行商业切断的DBS稀释敏感性降低。未加标的供体结果用于计算DBS特异性截止值(Avg + >=7SD)。对于DBS特异性临界值(CHIV-0.51指数,hbsi -0.31指数,HBcT2-0.46指数),所有未加标的供体DBS样本均无反应,所有3项检测均显示100%的特异性。DBS特异性截止值显著提高了DBS稀释敏感性。与血浆相比,HBsII和HBcT2检测的稀释敏感性低2倍,CHIV检测的稀释敏感性低2-5倍。结论Atellica IM CHIV和HBcT2检测与DBS具有相当的性能。在发展。非市售。不能保证将来的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书