B-165 Evaluation of a newly developed Access anti-HAV IgM immunoassay on the DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzer in the United States

IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Hannah Hartman, Saeed Jortani, Ian Gunsolus, Fred Apple, Stephanie Bord Romeu, Thomas Robin, Danielle Maher
{"title":"B-165 Evaluation of a newly developed Access anti-HAV IgM immunoassay on the DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzer in the United States","authors":"Hannah Hartman, Saeed Jortani, Ian Gunsolus, Fred Apple, Stephanie Bord Romeu, Thomas Robin, Danielle Maher","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvag086.469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Beckman Coulter, Inc. recently developed a fully automated Access anti-hepatitis A Virus (HAV) IgM assay for the detection of IgM antibodies to HAV for use on the DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzer. The assay's analytical and clinical performances were evaluated. Methods Imprecision was evaluated using three replicates of eight samples including serum and plasma and two quality controls using multiple reagent packs and calibrator lots in 40 runs based on CLSI EP05-A3. Reproducibility was evaluated at three U.S clinical laboratories using one lot of reagent, with low and high negative and positive serum and plasma samples, and quality controls based on CLSI EP05-A3. Cross-reactivity was evaluated using 348 negative samples and a reference method across 25 categories including other viral infection and auto-immune diseases. Seroconversion panels were tested to evaluate sensitivity of the Access anti-HAV IgM Assay in early detection of hepatitis A IgM antibodies. Clinical performance on the DxI 9000 Analyzer was evaluated in comparison to commercially available FDA-cleared anti-HAV IgM reference assays at three U.S clinical laboratories to evaluate the assay’s ability as an aid in the diagnosis of acute or recent HAV infection. Results Within-Laboratory imprecision demonstrated = 7.7 % CV for samples = 1.00 S/CO, and standard deviation (SD) = 0.05 for samples < 1.00 S/CO while reproducibility demonstrated an overall imprecision = 8.8% for samples = 1.00 S/CO (n=360) and an SD of = 0.05 for samples < 1.00 S/CO (n=360). The cross-reactivity study demonstrated overall negative agreement of 100.0% versus the reference assay. In seroconversion testing, the Access anti-HAV IgM assay exhibited sensitivity equivalent to the reference assay across three panels, notably detecting anti-HAV IgM one bleed earlier on a fourth panel. The Access anti-HAV IgM assay demonstrated overall PPA of 100.0% (n=88/88; 95% CI: 95.8-100.0%) and NPA of 99.3% (n=762/767; 95% CI: 98.5-99.7%) in the diagnostic population. Conclusion The Access anti-HAV IgM assay consistently demonstrated excellent analytical and clinical performance, proving equivalent to currently FDA-cleared anti-HAV IgM assays. Given the recent shift in US hepatitis A outbreaks1 from predominantly food-borne to person-to-person transmission, the introduction of a new, high-throughput anti-HAV IgM assay is particularly significant, enabling robust and scalable serologic testing crucial for effective public health surveillance and outbreak management.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvag086.469","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Beckman Coulter, Inc. recently developed a fully automated Access anti-hepatitis A Virus (HAV) IgM assay for the detection of IgM antibodies to HAV for use on the DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzer. The assay's analytical and clinical performances were evaluated. Methods Imprecision was evaluated using three replicates of eight samples including serum and plasma and two quality controls using multiple reagent packs and calibrator lots in 40 runs based on CLSI EP05-A3. Reproducibility was evaluated at three U.S clinical laboratories using one lot of reagent, with low and high negative and positive serum and plasma samples, and quality controls based on CLSI EP05-A3. Cross-reactivity was evaluated using 348 negative samples and a reference method across 25 categories including other viral infection and auto-immune diseases. Seroconversion panels were tested to evaluate sensitivity of the Access anti-HAV IgM Assay in early detection of hepatitis A IgM antibodies. Clinical performance on the DxI 9000 Analyzer was evaluated in comparison to commercially available FDA-cleared anti-HAV IgM reference assays at three U.S clinical laboratories to evaluate the assay’s ability as an aid in the diagnosis of acute or recent HAV infection. Results Within-Laboratory imprecision demonstrated = 7.7 % CV for samples = 1.00 S/CO, and standard deviation (SD) = 0.05 for samples < 1.00 S/CO while reproducibility demonstrated an overall imprecision = 8.8% for samples = 1.00 S/CO (n=360) and an SD of = 0.05 for samples < 1.00 S/CO (n=360). The cross-reactivity study demonstrated overall negative agreement of 100.0% versus the reference assay. In seroconversion testing, the Access anti-HAV IgM assay exhibited sensitivity equivalent to the reference assay across three panels, notably detecting anti-HAV IgM one bleed earlier on a fourth panel. The Access anti-HAV IgM assay demonstrated overall PPA of 100.0% (n=88/88; 95% CI: 95.8-100.0%) and NPA of 99.3% (n=762/767; 95% CI: 98.5-99.7%) in the diagnostic population. Conclusion The Access anti-HAV IgM assay consistently demonstrated excellent analytical and clinical performance, proving equivalent to currently FDA-cleared anti-HAV IgM assays. Given the recent shift in US hepatitis A outbreaks1 from predominantly food-borne to person-to-person transmission, the introduction of a new, high-throughput anti-HAV IgM assay is particularly significant, enabling robust and scalable serologic testing crucial for effective public health surveillance and outbreak management.
美国DxI 9000免疫分析分析仪上新开发的Access抗hav IgM免疫分析的B-165评价
Beckman Coulter, Inc.最近开发了一种全自动Access抗甲型肝炎病毒(HAV) IgM检测方法,用于DxI 9000免疫分析分析仪检测HAV的IgM抗体。评价了该方法的分析性能和临床性能。方法以CLSI EP05-A3为基础,对血清、血浆等8份样品进行3次重复,对40批样品进行2次质控,使用多个试剂包和校准批次进行不精密度评价。在美国三家临床实验室使用同一批次试剂,用低、高阴性和阳性血清和血浆样品进行重复性评估,并根据CLSI EP05-A3进行质量控制。交叉反应性评价采用348份阴性样本和参考方法,涉及其他病毒感染和自身免疫性疾病等25个类别。对血清转换板进行了测试,以评估Access抗甲型肝炎IgM检测在早期检测甲型肝炎IgM抗体方面的敏感性。将DxI 9000分析仪的临床性能与美国三家临床实验室市售的经fda批准的抗甲型肝炎IgM参考试剂进行比较,以评估该试剂在诊断急性或近期甲型肝炎感染方面的辅助能力。结果:当样品= 1.00 S/CO时,实验室内不精密度CV = 7.7%,当样品&;lt;在样品= 1.00 S/CO (n=360)时,重现性显示总体不精密度= 8.8%,在样品&;lt;1.00 S/CO (n=360)。交叉反应性研究表明,与参考分析相比,总体阴性一致性为100.0%。在血清转换测试中,Access抗- hav IgM检测在三个检测板上表现出与参考检测相当的灵敏度,特别是在第四个检测板上检测到抗- hav IgM较早出血。Access anti-HAV IgM检测显示,在诊断人群中,总PPA为100.0% (n=88/88; 95% CI: 95.8-100.0%), NPA为99.3% (n=762/767; 95% CI: 98.5-99.7%)。结论Access抗hav IgM检测始终表现出优异的分析和临床性能,证明与目前fda批准的抗hav IgM检测相当。鉴于最近美国甲型肝炎疫情从主要食源性传播向人际传播的转变,引入一种新的高通量抗甲型肝炎IgM检测方法尤为重要,它能够实现强大和可扩展的血清学检测,对有效的公共卫生监测和疫情管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书