Oral glucocorticoid dose patterns and organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus – a nationwide cohort study

IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Annica Dominicus, Álvaro Gomez, Ngoc V. Nguyen, Karin Blomkvist Sporre, Francesca Faustini, Elisabet Svenungsson, Elizabeth V. Arkema
{"title":"Oral glucocorticoid dose patterns and organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus – a nationwide cohort study","authors":"Annica Dominicus, Álvaro Gomez, Ngoc V. Nguyen, Karin Blomkvist Sporre, Francesca Faustini, Elisabet Svenungsson, Elizabeth V. Arkema","doi":"10.1002/art.70360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Evaluating the relationship between glucocorticoid (GC) exposure and organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is challenging since GC dose varies over time. It is unclear which exposure time window captures the full impact of GC usage. Methods We studied a nationwide cohort of individuals with newly diagnosed SLE 2006‐2022 with follow‐up until January 2024 through a linkage of Swedish national registers. Long‐term oral GC exposure was assessed from pharmacy dispensations to identify which dosing patterns had the strongest association with organ damage overall, and within the ocular, cardiovascular, peripheral vascular, gastrointestinal, diabetes, and malignancy domains. We used Weighted Cumulative Exposure models to estimate the weights of the average daily dose at different time points and determine the relative importance of exposure on organ damage accrual, adjusted for confounders. Results Among 3749 patients with newly diagnosed SLE (82.1% female, median age 48.0 years), the increased risk of first organ damage overall associated with GC dosing was well‐captured by the past 2 years (adjusted HR=1.42 [95%CI 1.31‐1.53] for 5 mg/day), and fairly well captured by the past 1 year (adjusted HR=1.34 [95%CI 1.23‐1.42] for 5 mg/day). For cardiovascular damage, dose patterns over the past 3 years substantially contributed to the associated increased risk. Conclusions In evaluations of overall organ damage in SLE, GC exposure during at least the previous year should be considered to capture the associated increased risk. For cardiovascular damage, the time window for assessing GC exposure and disease activity should be extended to the last 3 years.","PeriodicalId":129,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.70360","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Evaluating the relationship between glucocorticoid (GC) exposure and organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is challenging since GC dose varies over time. It is unclear which exposure time window captures the full impact of GC usage. Methods We studied a nationwide cohort of individuals with newly diagnosed SLE 2006‐2022 with follow‐up until January 2024 through a linkage of Swedish national registers. Long‐term oral GC exposure was assessed from pharmacy dispensations to identify which dosing patterns had the strongest association with organ damage overall, and within the ocular, cardiovascular, peripheral vascular, gastrointestinal, diabetes, and malignancy domains. We used Weighted Cumulative Exposure models to estimate the weights of the average daily dose at different time points and determine the relative importance of exposure on organ damage accrual, adjusted for confounders. Results Among 3749 patients with newly diagnosed SLE (82.1% female, median age 48.0 years), the increased risk of first organ damage overall associated with GC dosing was well‐captured by the past 2 years (adjusted HR=1.42 [95%CI 1.31‐1.53] for 5 mg/day), and fairly well captured by the past 1 year (adjusted HR=1.34 [95%CI 1.23‐1.42] for 5 mg/day). For cardiovascular damage, dose patterns over the past 3 years substantially contributed to the associated increased risk. Conclusions In evaluations of overall organ damage in SLE, GC exposure during at least the previous year should be considered to capture the associated increased risk. For cardiovascular damage, the time window for assessing GC exposure and disease activity should be extended to the last 3 years.
口服糖皮质激素剂量模式和系统性红斑狼疮的器官损害-一项全国性队列研究
背景:由于糖皮质激素(GC)剂量随时间变化,评估系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者糖皮质激素(GC)暴露与器官损害之间的关系具有挑战性。目前还不清楚哪个暴露时间窗口能够捕捉到GC使用的全部影响。方法:我们研究了2006 - 2022年新诊断的SLE患者的全国队列,并通过瑞典国家登记处的联系随访至2024年1月。从药房配药开始评估长期口服GC暴露,以确定哪种剂量模式与器官损害(包括眼部、心血管、外周血管、胃肠道、糖尿病和恶性肿瘤)的总体关联最强。我们使用加权累积暴露模型来估计不同时间点的平均日剂量的权重,并确定暴露对器官损伤累积的相对重要性,并根据混杂因素进行调整。结果在3749例新诊断的SLE患者中(82.1%为女性,中位年龄48.0岁),与GC剂量相关的第一器官损害风险总体增加在过去2年中被很好地捕获(5mg /天调整HR=1.42 [95%CI 1.31‐1.53]),并且在过去1年中被很好地捕获(5mg /天调整HR=1.34 [95%CI 1.23‐1.42])。对于心血管损伤,过去3年的剂量模式对相关风险增加有很大贡献。结论:在评估SLE的整体器官损害时,应考虑至少在前一年的GC暴露,以捕获相关的增加风险。对于心血管损伤,评估GC暴露和疾病活动的时间窗口应延长至最近3年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Arthritis & Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: Arthritis & Rheumatology is the official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and focuses on the natural history, pathophysiology, treatment, and outcome of rheumatic diseases. It is a peer-reviewed publication that aims to provide the highest quality basic and clinical research in this field. The journal covers a wide range of investigative areas and also includes review articles, editorials, and educational material for researchers and clinicians. Being recognized as a leading research journal in rheumatology, Arthritis & Rheumatology serves the global community of rheumatology investigators and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书