Linking Ecosystem Risk, Health, Services to Ecological Security Assessment in the Yellow River Basin: Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Nonlinear Driving Characteristics

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Menghao Yang, Ming Wang, Haipeng Zhang, Zhihong Yao
{"title":"Linking Ecosystem Risk, Health, Services to Ecological Security Assessment in the Yellow River Basin: Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Nonlinear Driving Characteristics","authors":"Menghao Yang, Ming Wang, Haipeng Zhang, Zhihong Yao","doi":"10.1002/ldr.70896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A scientific assessment of ecological security (ES) and its nonlinear mechanism for key driving factors in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) is of great significance for ecological protection and sustainable development. This study proposes an ES assessment framework, which links ecosystem risk (ER), ecosystem health (EH), and ecosystem services (ESS). We applied this framework to reveal the YRB's ES characteristics from 2000 to 2023, and explored the reliability of the assessment results. By coupling the XGBoost‐SHAP model, we identified the dominant driving factors of ES and quantified their nonlinear response relationships as well as key thresholds. The results indicated that under the comprehensive effect of significant decline in ER, overall improvement in EH and ESS in the YRB, the ES level showed a steady upward trend, with a stable pattern of high in the south and low in the north, and significant spatial positive correlation characteristics. The forest and grassland proportion, precipitation, vegetation coverage, and the construction land proportion are the dominant driving factors affecting ES, and each driving factor exhibited clear threshold characteristics in its impact on ES. Among them, the beneficial effects of the forest and grassland proportion, precipitation, and vegetation coverage on ES significantly increased when exceeding the thresholds of 49.6%, 512.2 mm, and 67.2%, respectively. The ecological impact of construction land proportion becomes negative when exceeding the threshold of 10.5%, showing a coercing effect. Our research not only provides key control objects and threshold basis for the ES management in the YRB, but also provides a robust framework for other similar regional ES research.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70896","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A scientific assessment of ecological security (ES) and its nonlinear mechanism for key driving factors in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) is of great significance for ecological protection and sustainable development. This study proposes an ES assessment framework, which links ecosystem risk (ER), ecosystem health (EH), and ecosystem services (ESS). We applied this framework to reveal the YRB's ES characteristics from 2000 to 2023, and explored the reliability of the assessment results. By coupling the XGBoost‐SHAP model, we identified the dominant driving factors of ES and quantified their nonlinear response relationships as well as key thresholds. The results indicated that under the comprehensive effect of significant decline in ER, overall improvement in EH and ESS in the YRB, the ES level showed a steady upward trend, with a stable pattern of high in the south and low in the north, and significant spatial positive correlation characteristics. The forest and grassland proportion, precipitation, vegetation coverage, and the construction land proportion are the dominant driving factors affecting ES, and each driving factor exhibited clear threshold characteristics in its impact on ES. Among them, the beneficial effects of the forest and grassland proportion, precipitation, and vegetation coverage on ES significantly increased when exceeding the thresholds of 49.6%, 512.2 mm, and 67.2%, respectively. The ecological impact of construction land proportion becomes negative when exceeding the threshold of 10.5%, showing a coercing effect. Our research not only provides key control objects and threshold basis for the ES management in the YRB, but also provides a robust framework for other similar regional ES research.
黄河流域生态系统风险、健康、服务与生态安全评价:时空动态与非线性驱动特征
科学评价黄河流域生态安全及其非线性驱动机制对生态保护和可持续发展具有重要意义。本研究提出了一个生态系统风险(ER)、生态系统健康(EH)和生态系统服务(ESS)之间联系的生态系统评估框架。运用该框架揭示了2000 - 2023年长江三角洲生态环境特征,并探讨了评价结果的可靠性。通过耦合XGBoost - SHAP模型,我们确定了ES的主要驱动因素,并量化了它们的非线性响应关系和关键阈值。结果表明:在长江三角洲ER显著下降、EH和ESS整体改善的综合作用下,ES水平呈稳定上升趋势,呈现南高北低的稳定格局,且具有显著的空间正相关特征;林草比例、降水、植被覆盖度、建设用地比例是影响ES的主导驱动因子,各驱动因子对ES的影响均表现出明显的阈值特征。其中,林草比例、降水量和植被覆盖度对ES的有利影响在分别超过49.6%、512.2 mm和67.2%阈值后显著增加。建设用地比例超过10.5%的阈值后,生态影响变为负值,表现出胁迫效应。本研究不仅为长江三角洲生态系统管理提供了关键控制对象和阈值依据,也为其他类似区域生态系统研究提供了强有力的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书