Yanping Wu, Jinying Xu, Zhengjun Jian, Hailin You, Zheren Yan, Jiafei Ye, Wenjing Yang, Yong Ge, Bo Yao, Qiwu Hu
{"title":"Iron-bound organic carbon responses to land-use change vary with soil carbon availability and Fe-pool composition","authors":"Yanping Wu, Jinying Xu, Zhengjun Jian, Hailin You, Zheren Yan, Jiafei Ye, Wenjing Yang, Yong Ge, Bo Yao, Qiwu Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.118031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Iron-bound organic carbon (Fe-OC) contributes to soil organic carbon (SOC) persistence, but its broad-scale response to land-use change (LUC) remains unclear. We synthesized paired-site observations from 75 publications worldwide. Degradation and restoration were analyzed separately relative to their respective paired reference sites. Degraded soils contained less SOC, Fe-OC, clay, total nitrogen, and total Fe, but had higher topsoil bulk density and pH. They also showed smaller relative contributions of short-range-order and organically complexed Fe forms. Restored soils contained more SOC, Fe-OC, clay, nutrients, and total Fe and showed greater relative contributions of these Fe forms, but had lower pH. However, Fe-OC accounted for a smaller share of SOC in restored soils, while organic carbon loading relative to extractable Fe was higher. Predictor support differed between LUC categories: SOC, pH, and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) received the strongest statistical support under degradation, whereas SOC, C/N, and the Feo/Fed ratio received the strongest support under restoration. Overall, these independent contrasts indicate that Fe-OC responses vary with soil carbon availability and Fe-pool composition. Higher bulk SOC in restoration comparisons therefore does not necessarily indicate a proportionally greater contribution of Fe-associated carbon.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"474 ","pages":"Article 118031"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706126003599","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Iron-bound organic carbon (Fe-OC) contributes to soil organic carbon (SOC) persistence, but its broad-scale response to land-use change (LUC) remains unclear. We synthesized paired-site observations from 75 publications worldwide. Degradation and restoration were analyzed separately relative to their respective paired reference sites. Degraded soils contained less SOC, Fe-OC, clay, total nitrogen, and total Fe, but had higher topsoil bulk density and pH. They also showed smaller relative contributions of short-range-order and organically complexed Fe forms. Restored soils contained more SOC, Fe-OC, clay, nutrients, and total Fe and showed greater relative contributions of these Fe forms, but had lower pH. However, Fe-OC accounted for a smaller share of SOC in restored soils, while organic carbon loading relative to extractable Fe was higher. Predictor support differed between LUC categories: SOC, pH, and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) received the strongest statistical support under degradation, whereas SOC, C/N, and the Feo/Fed ratio received the strongest support under restoration. Overall, these independent contrasts indicate that Fe-OC responses vary with soil carbon availability and Fe-pool composition. Higher bulk SOC in restoration comparisons therefore does not necessarily indicate a proportionally greater contribution of Fe-associated carbon.
期刊介绍:
Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.