Floodplain forests outperform croplands as methane sinks while exhibiting greater microbial methane-production potential

IF 7.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Geoderma Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-29 DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.118071
Marie-Ange Moisan, Vincent Maire, Julien Tremblay, François Guillemette, Alexandre Roy, Marie-Josée Morency, Jacynthe Masse, Christine Martineau
{"title":"Floodplain forests outperform croplands as methane sinks while exhibiting greater microbial methane-production potential","authors":"Marie-Ange Moisan,&nbsp;Vincent Maire,&nbsp;Julien Tremblay,&nbsp;François Guillemette,&nbsp;Alexandre Roy,&nbsp;Marie-Josée Morency,&nbsp;Jacynthe Masse,&nbsp;Christine Martineau","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.118071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Floodplains represent major sources of methane, a greenhouse gas with significant warming potential, as high soil humidity favors microbial methane production (methanogenesis) over consumption (methanotrophy). Land use also influences methane dynamics by modulating soil properties that regulate methanogenesis and methanotrophy, with forest soils generally showing the greatest methanotrophic potential. However, how land use shapes microbial functions regulating soil methane fluxes remains largely uncharacterized in floodplains. This study aims to better understand the role of forests relative to grasslands and croplands in floodplain methane budgets by assessing soil methane fluxes and microbial functional potential and activity. We used metagenomics and metatranscriptomics to investigate carbon- and methane-cycling gene abundance and expression across land uses, and how these were linked to variations in soil methane fluxes in the Lake St-Pierre floodplain (Quebec). We demonstrated that forests were long-term methane sinks, exhibiting significantly higher uptake rates than croplands, underscoring the importance to protect forests in floodplain ecosystems. Despite greater methane uptake over years, forest soils exhibited a higher potential for anaerobic metabolisms and could switch to net sources at specific times and sites under high water table conditions. The expression of genes regulating acetate conversion, CO<sub>2</sub> reduction, and H<sub>2</sub> oxidation explained flux variations, indicating that substrate conversion and electron generation are key steps driving methane production and spatiotemporal variation in soil methane fluxes in floodplains. Overall, our study demonstrates how methane cycling varies between floodplain forests and croplands across temporal scales in response to environmental controls, clarifying their respective roles in climate regulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"474 ","pages":"Article 118071"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001670612600399X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Floodplains represent major sources of methane, a greenhouse gas with significant warming potential, as high soil humidity favors microbial methane production (methanogenesis) over consumption (methanotrophy). Land use also influences methane dynamics by modulating soil properties that regulate methanogenesis and methanotrophy, with forest soils generally showing the greatest methanotrophic potential. However, how land use shapes microbial functions regulating soil methane fluxes remains largely uncharacterized in floodplains. This study aims to better understand the role of forests relative to grasslands and croplands in floodplain methane budgets by assessing soil methane fluxes and microbial functional potential and activity. We used metagenomics and metatranscriptomics to investigate carbon- and methane-cycling gene abundance and expression across land uses, and how these were linked to variations in soil methane fluxes in the Lake St-Pierre floodplain (Quebec). We demonstrated that forests were long-term methane sinks, exhibiting significantly higher uptake rates than croplands, underscoring the importance to protect forests in floodplain ecosystems. Despite greater methane uptake over years, forest soils exhibited a higher potential for anaerobic metabolisms and could switch to net sources at specific times and sites under high water table conditions. The expression of genes regulating acetate conversion, CO2 reduction, and H2 oxidation explained flux variations, indicating that substrate conversion and electron generation are key steps driving methane production and spatiotemporal variation in soil methane fluxes in floodplains. Overall, our study demonstrates how methane cycling varies between floodplain forests and croplands across temporal scales in response to environmental controls, clarifying their respective roles in climate regulation.
洪泛平原森林在甲烷汇方面的表现优于农田,同时显示出更大的微生物甲烷生产潜力
洪泛平原是甲烷的主要来源,甲烷是一种具有显著变暖潜力的温室气体,因为高土壤湿度有利于微生物甲烷生产(产甲烷)而不是消耗(产甲烷)。土地利用还通过调节调节甲烷生成和甲烷营养的土壤特性来影响甲烷动态,森林土壤通常表现出最大的甲烷营养潜力。然而,在洪泛平原上,土地利用如何影响微生物调节土壤甲烷通量的功能在很大程度上仍未得到表征。本研究旨在通过评估土壤甲烷通量和微生物功能潜力和活动,更好地了解森林相对于草地和农田在洪泛平原甲烷预算中的作用。我们使用宏基因组学和亚转录组学研究了碳和甲烷循环基因的丰度和在不同土地利用中的表达,以及它们如何与魁北克圣皮埃尔湖洪泛平原土壤甲烷通量的变化联系起来。我们证明了森林是长期的甲烷汇,表现出比农田更高的吸收率,强调了在洪泛区生态系统中保护森林的重要性。尽管多年来甲烷吸收率更高,但森林土壤表现出更高的厌氧代谢潜力,并可能在高地下水位条件下的特定时间和地点转换为净来源。调控乙酸转化、CO2还原和H2氧化的基因表达解释了通量的变化,表明底物转化和电子生成是驱动洪泛平原甲烷产量和土壤甲烷通量时空变化的关键步骤。总体而言,我们的研究展示了甲烷循环在洪泛区森林和农田之间如何随环境控制而在时间尺度上发生变化,阐明了它们各自在气候调节中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书