Toward a research agenda for actionable ecological science

IF 6.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-13 DOI:10.1002/fee.70060
Diane E Pataki, Peter M Groffman, Austin Himes, Matt S Schuler, Lilli Kaarakka, Matthew A McCary, Danielle Ignace, Nalini Rao
{"title":"Toward a research agenda for actionable ecological science","authors":"Diane E Pataki,&nbsp;Peter M Groffman,&nbsp;Austin Himes,&nbsp;Matt S Schuler,&nbsp;Lilli Kaarakka,&nbsp;Matthew A McCary,&nbsp;Danielle Ignace,&nbsp;Nalini Rao","doi":"10.1002/fee.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since January 2025, the content and process of science in the US have been subject to much discussion and debate. This ferment has caused many of us to think deeply about the value of our science and how it benefits society.</p><p>The Ecological Society of America (ESA) has a long history of developing community-wide, consensus agendas for ecological research that provide societal benefits. In 1991, the Sustainable Biosphere Initiative developed a framework to prioritize ecological research topics related to global change, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable ecological systems. In 2002, the Ecological Visions Project further updated and advanced community research priorities in ecological sustainability; and later, in 2009, the Earth Stewardship Initiative focused on the actionability of ecological science by identifying the knowledge needed for global stewardship.</p><p>To consider the future of ecology in the current social and political context of science in the US and beyond, we now have a new initiative: the <i>ESA Task Force to Establish a Research Agenda in Actionable Ecological Science</i> (hereafter, “task force”). While contemplating ways to bring the ESA community together to discuss a future research agenda, the task force—composed of a small group of ESA members—posed pressing questions: How has ecology as a discipline contributed to societal and environmental problem-solving in the past? Are decision-makers and the general public aware of these successes? What are current best practices for conducting actionable ecological research? What are the most urgent and important societal challenges that can be informed by advances in ecological science? How can we foster dialogue across a broader group of ecologists and practitioners outside the task force?</p><p>To address these questions, the task force held a Special Session at the 2025 ESA annual meeting in Baltimore and developed a survey asking ESA members to rank choices associated with three overarching questions:</p><p>(1) What are the most urgent research directions in ecology for climate adaptation and/or mitigation?</p><p>(2) What are the most urgent research directions in ecology to address habitat and biodiversity loss?</p><p>(3) What are the most urgent research priorities for helping to ensure a fair distribution of ecological amenities and benefits?</p><p>Although we intend to publish a more detailed analysis, including methods and results, from the survey elsewhere, here we briefly summarize the initial 56 responses received. Most respondents (61%) were from a college or university, followed by 20% from non-profit organizations, and 9% from the federal government. With respect to career stage, 33% of respondents self-identified as mid-career, 25% as early career, 18% as students, and 21.5% as retired and/or emeritus. Some key responses from those initial participants are provided below:</p><p><i>Holistic solutions that consider and address multiple, interacting issues</i> – Natural climate solutions with climate, habitat, and social co-benefits were the highest-ranked research priority in the survey, and topics that focused on interactions among threats of climate change, biodiversity/habitat loss, and environmental justice were prioritized. Respondents emphasized the need for integrated research among socioenvironmental threats, as well as among the social and natural sciences.</p><p><i>Mitigating threats to ecosystems, habitat, and biodiversity</i> – Scalable renewable energy solutions that do not endanger habitats were a highly ranked research topic that reflects an emerging area of actionable ecological research. In addition, testing solutions for mitigating species and ecosystem threats such as habitat loss, pollution, climate change, invasive species, and/or over-exploitation emerged as a high priority.</p><p><i>Community-led and community-engaged solutions</i> – Such solutions were ranked in the top three priorities in response to all ranked-choice questions. In the area of addressing habitat and biodiversity loss, incorporating Indigenous and Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) was the second most highly ranked topic.</p><p><i>An expansive approach to ecological science integrated with other disciplines –</i> While the survey was designed with inter- and transdisciplinary topics and applications of ecology in mind, respondents expanded these topics even further and added research priorities related to economics, human behavior, public engagement, policy and governance, and human health. Each successive community research agenda—from the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme to the Sustainable Biosphere Initiative and the Earth Stewardship Initiative—has pushed the boundary of ecology further outside the confines of the biological sciences. The survey responses here support this trend.</p><p>We are excited by these results! They show that ecology is a vibrant, evolving discipline that provides a wide range of benefits to society. Our survey is still open, and we welcome you to respond! In the coming months, we look forward to further discussion with scientists, practitioners, and community members about how ecology can discover and test new solutions to both emerging and long-standing problems. We will hold an in-person event—Research Priorities for Actionable Ecology: A Cross-Sector Town Hall—on Tuesday July 28 at the 2026 ESA annual meeting in Salt Lake City and subsequent virtual sessions not only to foster dialogue but also to identify barriers to advancing cutting-edge science. Together, we will work as a community to develop and implement consensus agendas for ecological research that address the challenges we face today, while looking toward a better and more vibrant future for all.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"24 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.70060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.70060","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since January 2025, the content and process of science in the US have been subject to much discussion and debate. This ferment has caused many of us to think deeply about the value of our science and how it benefits society.

The Ecological Society of America (ESA) has a long history of developing community-wide, consensus agendas for ecological research that provide societal benefits. In 1991, the Sustainable Biosphere Initiative developed a framework to prioritize ecological research topics related to global change, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable ecological systems. In 2002, the Ecological Visions Project further updated and advanced community research priorities in ecological sustainability; and later, in 2009, the Earth Stewardship Initiative focused on the actionability of ecological science by identifying the knowledge needed for global stewardship.

To consider the future of ecology in the current social and political context of science in the US and beyond, we now have a new initiative: the ESA Task Force to Establish a Research Agenda in Actionable Ecological Science (hereafter, “task force”). While contemplating ways to bring the ESA community together to discuss a future research agenda, the task force—composed of a small group of ESA members—posed pressing questions: How has ecology as a discipline contributed to societal and environmental problem-solving in the past? Are decision-makers and the general public aware of these successes? What are current best practices for conducting actionable ecological research? What are the most urgent and important societal challenges that can be informed by advances in ecological science? How can we foster dialogue across a broader group of ecologists and practitioners outside the task force?

To address these questions, the task force held a Special Session at the 2025 ESA annual meeting in Baltimore and developed a survey asking ESA members to rank choices associated with three overarching questions:

(1) What are the most urgent research directions in ecology for climate adaptation and/or mitigation?

(2) What are the most urgent research directions in ecology to address habitat and biodiversity loss?

(3) What are the most urgent research priorities for helping to ensure a fair distribution of ecological amenities and benefits?

Although we intend to publish a more detailed analysis, including methods and results, from the survey elsewhere, here we briefly summarize the initial 56 responses received. Most respondents (61%) were from a college or university, followed by 20% from non-profit organizations, and 9% from the federal government. With respect to career stage, 33% of respondents self-identified as mid-career, 25% as early career, 18% as students, and 21.5% as retired and/or emeritus. Some key responses from those initial participants are provided below:

Holistic solutions that consider and address multiple, interacting issues – Natural climate solutions with climate, habitat, and social co-benefits were the highest-ranked research priority in the survey, and topics that focused on interactions among threats of climate change, biodiversity/habitat loss, and environmental justice were prioritized. Respondents emphasized the need for integrated research among socioenvironmental threats, as well as among the social and natural sciences.

Mitigating threats to ecosystems, habitat, and biodiversity – Scalable renewable energy solutions that do not endanger habitats were a highly ranked research topic that reflects an emerging area of actionable ecological research. In addition, testing solutions for mitigating species and ecosystem threats such as habitat loss, pollution, climate change, invasive species, and/or over-exploitation emerged as a high priority.

Community-led and community-engaged solutions – Such solutions were ranked in the top three priorities in response to all ranked-choice questions. In the area of addressing habitat and biodiversity loss, incorporating Indigenous and Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) was the second most highly ranked topic.

An expansive approach to ecological science integrated with other disciplines – While the survey was designed with inter- and transdisciplinary topics and applications of ecology in mind, respondents expanded these topics even further and added research priorities related to economics, human behavior, public engagement, policy and governance, and human health. Each successive community research agenda—from the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme to the Sustainable Biosphere Initiative and the Earth Stewardship Initiative—has pushed the boundary of ecology further outside the confines of the biological sciences. The survey responses here support this trend.

We are excited by these results! They show that ecology is a vibrant, evolving discipline that provides a wide range of benefits to society. Our survey is still open, and we welcome you to respond! In the coming months, we look forward to further discussion with scientists, practitioners, and community members about how ecology can discover and test new solutions to both emerging and long-standing problems. We will hold an in-person event—Research Priorities for Actionable Ecology: A Cross-Sector Town Hall—on Tuesday July 28 at the 2026 ESA annual meeting in Salt Lake City and subsequent virtual sessions not only to foster dialogue but also to identify barriers to advancing cutting-edge science. Together, we will work as a community to develop and implement consensus agendas for ecological research that address the challenges we face today, while looking toward a better and more vibrant future for all.

为可行的生态科学制定研究议程
自2025年1月以来,美国的科学内容和过程一直受到许多讨论和辩论。这种骚动促使我们许多人深入思考科学的价值以及它如何造福社会。美国生态学会(ESA)在为提供社会效益的生态研究制定社区范围内的共识议程方面有着悠久的历史。1991年,可持续生物圈倡议制定了一个框架,优先考虑与全球变化、生物多样性保护和可持续生态系统有关的生态研究课题。2002年,“生态展望计划”进一步更新和推进社区在生态可持续性方面的研究重点;后来,在2009年,地球管理倡议通过确定全球管理所需的知识,专注于生态科学的可操作性。为了在美国及其他国家当前的社会和政治科学背景下考虑生态学的未来,我们现在有了一个新的倡议:欧空局建立可操作生态科学研究议程工作组(以下简称“工作组”)。在考虑如何将欧空局社区聚集在一起讨论未来的研究议程时,由一小群欧空局成员组成的工作组提出了一些紧迫的问题:生态学作为一门学科在过去如何为解决社会和环境问题做出贡献?决策者和公众是否意识到这些成功?目前进行可操作的生态研究的最佳做法是什么?在生态科学的进步中,最紧迫和最重要的社会挑战是什么?我们如何在工作组之外的更广泛的生态学家和实践者群体中促进对话?为了解决这些问题,工作组在巴尔的摩举行的2025年欧空局年会上举行了一次特别会议,并开展了一项调查,要求欧空局成员对与三个总体问题相关的选择进行排名:(1)适应和/或减缓气候变化的生态学最紧迫的研究方向是什么?(2)解决栖息地和生物多样性丧失的生态学研究方向是什么?(3)为了确保生态便利和利益的公平分配,最紧迫的研究重点是什么?虽然我们打算在其他地方发表更详细的分析,包括调查的方法和结果,但在这里我们简要总结收到的最初56份答复。大多数受访者(61%)来自学院或大学,其次是20%来自非营利组织,9%来自联邦政府。在职业阶段方面,33%的受访者认为自己处于职业中期,25%处于职业早期,18%为学生,21.5%为退休和/或退休。以下是最初参与者的一些关键回答:考虑和解决多个相互作用的问题的整体解决方案——具有气候、栖息地和社会共同效益的自然气候解决方案是调查中排名最高的研究重点,而关注气候变化威胁、生物多样性/栖息地丧失和环境正义之间相互作用的主题是优先考虑的。答复者强调需要在社会环境威胁之间以及在社会科学和自然科学之间进行综合研究。减轻对生态系统、栖息地和生物多样性的威胁——不危及栖息地的可扩展可再生能源解决方案是一个排名很高的研究课题,反映了一个新兴的可操作生态研究领域。此外,测试缓解物种和生态系统威胁的解决方案,如栖息地丧失、污染、气候变化、入侵物种和/或过度开发,已成为一个高度优先事项。社区主导和社区参与的解决方案——在回答所有排序选择题时,这类解决方案排在前三个优先级。在解决生境和生物多样性丧失问题方面,纳入土著和传统生态知识是排名第二高的主题。与其他学科相结合的广泛的生态科学方法——虽然调查的设计考虑了跨学科和跨学科的主题和生态学的应用,但受访者进一步扩展了这些主题,并增加了与经济学、人类行为、公众参与、政策和治理以及人类健康相关的研究重点。从“国际地圈-生物圈计划”到“可持续生物圈倡议”和“地球管理倡议”,每一个相继的社区研究议程都将生态学的边界进一步推向了生物科学的界限之外。这里的调查结果支持这一趋势。我们对这些结果感到兴奋!它们表明,生态学是一门充满活力、不断发展的学科,为社会提供了广泛的利益。 我们的调查仍在进行中,欢迎您的回复!在接下来的几个月里,我们期待着与科学家、实践者和社区成员进一步讨论生态学如何发现和测试新的解决方案,以解决新出现的和长期存在的问题。我们将于7月28日星期二在盐湖城举行的2026年欧空局年会上举行一场面对面的活动——“可操作生态学的研究优先事项:跨部门市政厅”,以及随后的虚拟会议,不仅要促进对话,还要确定推进前沿科学的障碍。我们将共同努力,制定和实施生态研究的共识议程,以应对我们今天面临的挑战,同时为所有人展望一个更美好、更有活力的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
1.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is a publication by the Ecological Society of America that focuses on the significance of ecology and environmental science in various aspects of research and problem-solving. The journal covers topics such as biodiversity conservation, ecosystem preservation, natural resource management, public policy, and other related areas. The publication features a range of content, including peer-reviewed articles, editorials, commentaries, letters, and occasional special issues and topical series. It releases ten issues per year, excluding January and July. ESA members receive both print and electronic copies of the journal, while institutional subscriptions are also available. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is highly regarded in the field, as indicated by its ranking in the 2021 Journal Citation Reports by Clarivate Analytics. The journal is ranked 4th out of 174 in ecology journals and 11th out of 279 in environmental sciences journals. Its impact factor for 2021 is reported as 13.789, which further demonstrates its influence and importance in the scientific community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书