Think Work – Think Office? Examining Managers' Stereotypes About People Working From Home and Their Impact on Promotion Recommendations

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Journal of Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2026-09-30 Epub Date: 2026-09-07 DOI:10.1111/jasp.70092
Hellen Gießen, René Schmoll
{"title":"Think Work – Think Office? Examining Managers' Stereotypes About People Working From Home and Their Impact on Promotion Recommendations","authors":"Hellen Gießen,&nbsp;René Schmoll","doi":"10.1111/jasp.70092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although working from home has become a widespread and institutionalized practice across organizations worldwide, evidence suggests that it continues to carry adverse career consequences for employees. Prior research indicates that such consequences – often referred to as the flexibility stigma – are contingent on a range of moderating factors that remain insufficiently understood. Addressing this gap, this study examines managers' stereotypes about people working from home and the moderating impact of these stereotypes on the flexibility stigma. We conducted a vignette-based online survey experiment with a sample of U.S. managers in May 2025, combining a self-developed Implicit Association Test with an explicit measure of managerial stereotypes. Results reveal consistent ‘think work – think office’ stereotypes across both implicit and explicit measures, associating people working from home more strongly with leisure and those working in the office more strongly with work. The explicit measure further indicates that managers who spend a greater proportion of their own work time at home hold weaker stereotypes. Our results also demonstrate that a flexibility stigma occurs only when employees work entirely from home, but not when they use a hybrid arrangement. Both implicitly and explicitly measured stereotypes strengthen the flexibility stigma that arises when employees work fully from home.</p>","PeriodicalId":48404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","volume":"56 10","pages":"741-755"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jasp.70092","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jasp.70092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although working from home has become a widespread and institutionalized practice across organizations worldwide, evidence suggests that it continues to carry adverse career consequences for employees. Prior research indicates that such consequences – often referred to as the flexibility stigma – are contingent on a range of moderating factors that remain insufficiently understood. Addressing this gap, this study examines managers' stereotypes about people working from home and the moderating impact of these stereotypes on the flexibility stigma. We conducted a vignette-based online survey experiment with a sample of U.S. managers in May 2025, combining a self-developed Implicit Association Test with an explicit measure of managerial stereotypes. Results reveal consistent ‘think work – think office’ stereotypes across both implicit and explicit measures, associating people working from home more strongly with leisure and those working in the office more strongly with work. The explicit measure further indicates that managers who spend a greater proportion of their own work time at home hold weaker stereotypes. Our results also demonstrate that a flexibility stigma occurs only when employees work entirely from home, but not when they use a hybrid arrangement. Both implicitly and explicitly measured stereotypes strengthen the flexibility stigma that arises when employees work fully from home.

思考工作-思考办公室?考察管理者对员工在家工作的刻板印象及其对晋升建议的影响
尽管在家工作已经成为世界各地组织普遍和制度化的做法,但有证据表明,它继续给员工带来不利的职业后果。先前的研究表明,这种后果——通常被称为灵活性耻辱——取决于一系列尚未充分了解的调节因素。为了解决这一差距,本研究考察了管理者对在家工作的刻板印象,以及这些刻板印象对灵活性污名的缓和影响。我们于2025年5月对美国经理样本进行了一项基于小插图的在线调查实验,将自我开发的内隐联想测试与管理刻板印象的显式测量相结合。结果显示,在隐性和显性测量中,“思考工作-思考办公室”的刻板印象都是一致的,在家工作的人更倾向于休闲,而在办公室工作的人更倾向于工作。这项明确的测量进一步表明,那些把大部分工作时间花在家里的经理们的刻板印象更弱。我们的研究结果还表明,只有当员工完全在家工作时,弹性工作制的污名才会出现,而当他们采用混合工作制时,这种污名就不会出现。当员工完全在家工作时,隐性和显性的刻板印象都会强化灵活性的污名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Published since 1971, Journal of Applied Social Psychology is a monthly publication devoted to applications of experimental behavioral science research to problems of society (e.g., organizational and leadership psychology, safety, health, and gender issues; perceptions of war and natural hazards; jury deliberation; performance, AIDS, cancer, heart disease, exercise, and sports).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书