Rocío B Ortega, Emiro Ibarra, Jesús A Parra, Nicolás F Quinteros, Kimberly L Dahl, Matías Zañartu
{"title":"Effects of Cognitive Load on Vocal Motor Control: A Model-Based Analysis in Individuals With Hyperfunctional and Healthy Voices.","authors":"Rocío B Ortega, Emiro Ibarra, Jesús A Parra, Nicolás F Quinteros, Kimberly L Dahl, Matías Zañartu","doi":"10.1044/2026_JSLHR-26-00043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined how cognitive load (CL) influences vocal motor control by integrating acoustic measures with biomechanical trajectories derived from a model-based approach. The aim was to determine whether speakers with vocal hyperfunction (VH) exhibit distinct modulation patterns in laryngeal control compared with healthy control (HC) speakers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Recordings from female speakers (63 with VH and 62 HC speakers) performing a Stroop task were analyzed. Trajectories of fundamental frequency (<i>f</i><sub>o</sub>) and sound pressure level (SPL) were extracted and used as inputs to a computational model that estimated cricothyroid (<i>a</i><sub>CT</sub>) and thyroarytenoid (<i>a</i><sub>TA</sub>) muscle activations, as well as subglottal pressure (<i>P</i><sub>S</sub>). Acoustic and model-derived measures were segmented and analyzed using mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant condition effects were found across acoustic and biomechanical features, with parallel patterns in <i>f</i><sub>o</sub> - <i>a</i><sub>CT</sub> and SPL - <i>P</i><sub>S</sub> across segments and groups. No consistent differences were observed for <i>a</i><sub>TA</sub>. The strongest effects occurred in SPL, which increased under CL, especially among speakers with VH, with <i>P</i><sub>S</sub> showing a similar but weaker trend. For <i>f</i><sub>o</sub> and <i>a</i><sub>CT</sub>, opposite group patterns emerged at task onset: HC speakers showed slight decreases, whereas those with VH showed increases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The correspondence between acoustic and estimated biomechanical modulations under CL supports the utility of this model-based approach for physiologically interpretable inference of laryngeal motor behavior. Speakers with VH showed greater modulation of <i>a</i><sub>CT</sub> and <i>P</i><sub>S</sub> control, with no systematic changes in <i>a</i><sub>TA</sub>, suggesting that arousal-related laryngeal tension primarily affects more superficial control dimension.</p>","PeriodicalId":520690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_JSLHR-26-00043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study examined how cognitive load (CL) influences vocal motor control by integrating acoustic measures with biomechanical trajectories derived from a model-based approach. The aim was to determine whether speakers with vocal hyperfunction (VH) exhibit distinct modulation patterns in laryngeal control compared with healthy control (HC) speakers.
Method: Recordings from female speakers (63 with VH and 62 HC speakers) performing a Stroop task were analyzed. Trajectories of fundamental frequency (fo) and sound pressure level (SPL) were extracted and used as inputs to a computational model that estimated cricothyroid (aCT) and thyroarytenoid (aTA) muscle activations, as well as subglottal pressure (PS). Acoustic and model-derived measures were segmented and analyzed using mixed-effects models.
Results: Significant condition effects were found across acoustic and biomechanical features, with parallel patterns in fo - aCT and SPL - PS across segments and groups. No consistent differences were observed for aTA. The strongest effects occurred in SPL, which increased under CL, especially among speakers with VH, with PS showing a similar but weaker trend. For fo and aCT, opposite group patterns emerged at task onset: HC speakers showed slight decreases, whereas those with VH showed increases.
Conclusions: The correspondence between acoustic and estimated biomechanical modulations under CL supports the utility of this model-based approach for physiologically interpretable inference of laryngeal motor behavior. Speakers with VH showed greater modulation of aCT and PS control, with no systematic changes in aTA, suggesting that arousal-related laryngeal tension primarily affects more superficial control dimension.