Multistate Analysis of Transfer to Adult Care in Sickle Cell Disease.

IF 4.5
Isaac A Janson, Amanda I Okolo, Joshua I Miller, Kathy L Hassell, Heather L Taylor, Julie Kanter, Brandon M Hardesty, Luisanna M Sánchez
{"title":"Multistate Analysis of Transfer to Adult Care in Sickle Cell Disease.","authors":"Isaac A Janson, Amanda I Okolo, Joshua I Miller, Kathy L Hassell, Heather L Taylor, Julie Kanter, Brandon M Hardesty, Luisanna M Sánchez","doi":"10.1016/j.jadohealth.2026.07.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Advancements in sickle cell disease (SCD) care have improved survival to adulthood in high-resource countries; however, a 20-year life expectancy gap persists compared with the general population. Transfer from pediatric to adult SCD care represents a vulnerable period, yet population-level data on transfer outcomes are limited. We evaluated rates and factors associated with successful transfer to adult care among youth with SCD across three US states and assessed associated health care utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) Sickle Cell Data Collection program from Alabama, Colorado, and Indiana and included individuals aged 15-20 years with confirmed or probable SCD and continuous insurance coverage for 12 months following their last pediatric encounter. Successful transfer was defined as ≥2 outpatient encounters with an adult provider within 12 months. Health care utilization, chronic transfusion therapy, and social vulnerability index (SVI) were analyzed by transfer status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 205 individuals, 42.4% achieved successful transfer to adult care. Of these, 18.6% established care with an adult hematologist/oncologist, and 5.8% with an adult SCD specialist. Successfully transferred youth demonstrated higher acute care utilization with median emergency department visits increasing from 3.02 to 3.97 per person-year post transfer, compared with 1.25 to 1.12 among the unsuccessful group. Chronic transfusion therapy was more common among the successfully transferred (16.1% vs. 13.6%), whereas SVI was similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Fewer than one-fifth of individuals with SCD successfully transferred to an adult hematologist/oncologist. Successful transfer was associated with higher acute and outpatient health care utilization, highlighting persistent gaps in continuity of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":520803,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2026.07.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Advancements in sickle cell disease (SCD) care have improved survival to adulthood in high-resource countries; however, a 20-year life expectancy gap persists compared with the general population. Transfer from pediatric to adult SCD care represents a vulnerable period, yet population-level data on transfer outcomes are limited. We evaluated rates and factors associated with successful transfer to adult care among youth with SCD across three US states and assessed associated health care utilization.

Methods: We used data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) Sickle Cell Data Collection program from Alabama, Colorado, and Indiana and included individuals aged 15-20 years with confirmed or probable SCD and continuous insurance coverage for 12 months following their last pediatric encounter. Successful transfer was defined as ≥2 outpatient encounters with an adult provider within 12 months. Health care utilization, chronic transfusion therapy, and social vulnerability index (SVI) were analyzed by transfer status.

Results: Among 205 individuals, 42.4% achieved successful transfer to adult care. Of these, 18.6% established care with an adult hematologist/oncologist, and 5.8% with an adult SCD specialist. Successfully transferred youth demonstrated higher acute care utilization with median emergency department visits increasing from 3.02 to 3.97 per person-year post transfer, compared with 1.25 to 1.12 among the unsuccessful group. Chronic transfusion therapy was more common among the successfully transferred (16.1% vs. 13.6%), whereas SVI was similar between groups.

Discussion: Fewer than one-fifth of individuals with SCD successfully transferred to an adult hematologist/oncologist. Successful transfer was associated with higher acute and outpatient health care utilization, highlighting persistent gaps in continuity of care.

镰状细胞病向成人护理转移的多状态分析
目的:镰状细胞病(SCD)治疗的进步改善了资源丰富国家的成人生存率;然而,与一般人群相比,20年的预期寿命差距仍然存在。从儿童到成人SCD护理的转移是一个脆弱的时期,但关于转移结果的人口水平数据有限。我们评估了美国三个州SCD青少年成功转到成人护理的比率和相关因素,并评估了相关的医疗保健利用。方法:我们使用了来自阿拉巴马州、科罗拉多州和印第安纳州疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)镰状细胞数据收集项目的数据,包括15-20岁确诊或可能患有SCD且在最后一次儿科就诊后连续12个月有保险的个体。成功转移的定义是在12个月内与成人提供者进行≥2次门诊接触。通过转移状态分析卫生保健利用、慢性输血治疗和社会脆弱性指数(SVI)。结果:205例患者中,42.4%成功转入成人护理。其中,18.6%的患者接受了成人血液学家/肿瘤学家的治疗,5.8%的患者接受了成人SCD专家的治疗。转院成功的青年表现出更高的急诊科使用率,转院后每年急诊就诊中位数从3.02次增加到3.97次,而转院失败的青年则从1.25次增加到1.12次。慢性输血治疗在成功转移的患者中更为常见(16.1%对13.6%),而两组之间的SVI相似。讨论:不到五分之一的SCD患者成功转移到成人血液学家/肿瘤学家。成功转移与较高的急性和门诊医疗保健使用率相关,突出了护理连续性方面的持续差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书