Evaluation of the Functional Outcome of Thoraco-Lumbar Burst Fractures Stabilization By Pedical Screw and Rod.

Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ Pub Date : 2026-10-01
K M R Islam, S Chowdhury
{"title":"Evaluation of the Functional Outcome of Thoraco-Lumbar Burst Fractures Stabilization By Pedical Screw and Rod.","authors":"K M R Islam, S Chowdhury","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thoraco-lumbar burst fractures are a type of spinal injury that typically result from high-energy trauma. These fractures involve compression of the vertebral body with posterior displacement of bone fragments into the spinal canal. Treatment typically involves surgical stabilization with pedicle screw and rod instrumentation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of thoracolumbar burst fractures with incomplete neurological lesion stabilized by pedicle screw and rod. This was a prospective experimental study carried out at Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh from January 2019 to December 2019. A total of 15 patients with Thoraco-Lumbar Burst fracture aged over 15 years were included in the study. A detailed history of the selected patient was taken with mode of injury, time of injury, other history, then thorough general, local, neurological examination for proper assessment. Among the 15 cases, 12 cases (80.0%) were male and 3 cases (20.0%) were female. The age range of patient was from 17 55 years. Most commonly affected people were laborers 5(33.33%). Fall from height was the commonest cause of injury 11(73.30%). Most commonly level of injury was L1 07 (46.70%). Pedicle screw and rod used in all cases for long segment reconstruction above and below the involved level. According to Frankel grade preoperatively most common grade was C 10 and next common was B 5. Post operatively most was D 9 and next was E 4 and C-2. According to Denis et al pain scale most commonly 8 (53.34%) cases complain no pain and work scale most commonly 2(13.33%) cases were completely well and can perform normal work up to latest follow-up. Mean hospital stay was (13.27±3.54) days (10 20) days. Satisfactory results (excellent and good) were in 13(86.66%), fair 1(6.67%) and 1(6.67%) unsatisfactory (poor) results. The results of the study demonstrates that functional outcome of Thoraco-Lumbar burst fractures stabilization by pedicle screw and rod is an effective procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":94148,"journal":{"name":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","volume":"35 4","pages":"1123-1131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thoraco-lumbar burst fractures are a type of spinal injury that typically result from high-energy trauma. These fractures involve compression of the vertebral body with posterior displacement of bone fragments into the spinal canal. Treatment typically involves surgical stabilization with pedicle screw and rod instrumentation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of thoracolumbar burst fractures with incomplete neurological lesion stabilized by pedicle screw and rod. This was a prospective experimental study carried out at Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh from January 2019 to December 2019. A total of 15 patients with Thoraco-Lumbar Burst fracture aged over 15 years were included in the study. A detailed history of the selected patient was taken with mode of injury, time of injury, other history, then thorough general, local, neurological examination for proper assessment. Among the 15 cases, 12 cases (80.0%) were male and 3 cases (20.0%) were female. The age range of patient was from 17 55 years. Most commonly affected people were laborers 5(33.33%). Fall from height was the commonest cause of injury 11(73.30%). Most commonly level of injury was L1 07 (46.70%). Pedicle screw and rod used in all cases for long segment reconstruction above and below the involved level. According to Frankel grade preoperatively most common grade was C 10 and next common was B 5. Post operatively most was D 9 and next was E 4 and C-2. According to Denis et al pain scale most commonly 8 (53.34%) cases complain no pain and work scale most commonly 2(13.33%) cases were completely well and can perform normal work up to latest follow-up. Mean hospital stay was (13.27±3.54) days (10 20) days. Satisfactory results (excellent and good) were in 13(86.66%), fair 1(6.67%) and 1(6.67%) unsatisfactory (poor) results. The results of the study demonstrates that functional outcome of Thoraco-Lumbar burst fractures stabilization by pedicle screw and rod is an effective procedure.

椎弓根钉棒稳定胸腰椎爆裂骨折的功能效果评价。
胸腰椎爆裂性骨折是一种典型的由高能创伤引起的脊柱损伤。这些骨折包括椎体受压,骨碎片后侧移位进入椎管。治疗通常包括椎弓根螺钉和棒内固定的手术稳定。本研究的目的是评估经椎弓根螺钉和棒固定的胸腰椎爆裂骨折伴不完全神经损伤的结果。这是2019年1月至2019年12月在孟加拉国达卡的孟加拉国医科大学进行的一项前瞻性实验研究。本研究共纳入15例年龄大于15岁的胸腰椎爆裂性骨折患者。对所选患者进行详细的病史记录,包括损伤方式、损伤时间、其他病史,然后进行全面、局部、神经学检查,以进行适当的评估。15例中男性12例(80.0%),女性3例(20.0%)。患者年龄17 ~ 55岁。最常见的感染人群是劳动者5(33.33%)。高处坠落是最常见的伤害原因11(73.30%)。最常见的损伤级别为L1 - 07(46.70%)。所有病例均使用椎弓根螺钉和棒进行受累节段上下的长节段重建。根据术前Frankel分级,最常见的分级为c10,其次为b5。术后最多的是d9,其次是e4和C-2。Denis等人疼痛量表最常见的8例(53.34%)无疼痛,工作量表最常见的2例(13.33%)至最近一次随访均完全康复,可正常工作。平均住院时间(13.27±3.54)天(1020)天。满意(优、良)13例(86.66%),一般1例(6.67%),不满意(差)1例(6.67%)。研究结果表明,椎弓根螺钉和棒稳定胸腰椎爆裂骨折的功能结果是一种有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书