Nuclear archaeology reassesses Heisenberg's last reactor experiment.

IF 4.8 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PNAS nexus Pub Date : 2026-09-29 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag282
Patrick J Park, Brittany Robertson, Miriam E Hiebert, Jason Zhao, Ciara B Sivels, Timothy W Koeth
{"title":"Nuclear archaeology reassesses Heisenberg's last reactor experiment.","authors":"Patrick J Park, Brittany Robertson, Miriam E Hiebert, Jason Zhao, Ciara B Sivels, Timothy W Koeth","doi":"10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The B8 pile, built in April 1945, was a natural uranium, heavy water reactor experiment and the culmination of Nazi Germany's nuclear program. Its designer, Werner Heisenberg, claimed in a 1947 <i>Nature</i> article that the B8 was \"just insufficient\" in achieving self-sustaining fission, lacking only a \"relatively small amount of uranium.\" In the following decades, historians have then suggested that the Germans should have pursued graphite reactors like the Americans. Here, we present forensics and document-based archaeology of the B8's uranium, heavy water, and graphites. We create a neutronics model that is validated by in situ 1945 measurements. Our calculations show that the B8, as built, had <math> <mrow><msub><mi>k</mi> <mrow><mi>e</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>f</mi></mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.94</mn></mrow> </math> . To achieve self-sustaining fission at <math> <mrow><msub><mi>k</mi> <mrow><mi>e</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>f</mi></mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.0</mn></mrow> </math> , the Germans would have needed about 2.0 times the uranium and about 2.2 times the heavy water than they used, far exceeding Heisenberg's predictions; these inventories were about 1.2 and 1.8 times, respectively, Germany's estimated available wartime inventories. Furthermore, we determine that their graphite, with 3.4 wppm boron impurities and re-used from the prior B7 experiment, would not allow criticality in a hypothetical graphite-natural uranium pile. German graphites were made of metallurgical coke, which naturally carry more boron than petroleum coke-based graphites, which were available in America and uniquely enabled Chicago Pile 1's criticality. Our findings indicate that Germany could not have built either a heavy water nor a graphite reactor in World War II.</p>","PeriodicalId":74468,"journal":{"name":"PNAS nexus","volume":"5 9","pages":"pgag282"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13621563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PNAS nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The B8 pile, built in April 1945, was a natural uranium, heavy water reactor experiment and the culmination of Nazi Germany's nuclear program. Its designer, Werner Heisenberg, claimed in a 1947 Nature article that the B8 was "just insufficient" in achieving self-sustaining fission, lacking only a "relatively small amount of uranium." In the following decades, historians have then suggested that the Germans should have pursued graphite reactors like the Americans. Here, we present forensics and document-based archaeology of the B8's uranium, heavy water, and graphites. We create a neutronics model that is validated by in situ 1945 measurements. Our calculations show that the B8, as built, had k e f f = 0.94 . To achieve self-sustaining fission at k e f f = 1.0 , the Germans would have needed about 2.0 times the uranium and about 2.2 times the heavy water than they used, far exceeding Heisenberg's predictions; these inventories were about 1.2 and 1.8 times, respectively, Germany's estimated available wartime inventories. Furthermore, we determine that their graphite, with 3.4 wppm boron impurities and re-used from the prior B7 experiment, would not allow criticality in a hypothetical graphite-natural uranium pile. German graphites were made of metallurgical coke, which naturally carry more boron than petroleum coke-based graphites, which were available in America and uniquely enabled Chicago Pile 1's criticality. Our findings indicate that Germany could not have built either a heavy water nor a graphite reactor in World War II.

核考古学重新评估了海森堡的最后一次反应堆实验。
B8反应堆堆建于1945年4月,是一个天然铀重水反应堆实验,也是纳粹德国核计划的高潮。它的设计者维尔纳·海森堡(Werner Heisenberg)在1947年《自然》杂志的一篇文章中声称,B8在实现自我维持裂变方面“只是不够”,只缺乏“相对少量的铀”。在接下来的几十年里,历史学家建议德国人应该像美国人一样追求石墨反应堆。在这里,我们展示了B8的铀、重水和石墨的法医和基于文献的考古学。我们创建了一个中子模型,并通过1945年的现场测量进行了验证。我们的计算表明,建造的B8的k = 0.94。为了在kef = 1.0时实现自持裂变,德国人将需要比他们使用的铀多2.0倍的铀和约2.2倍的重水,这远远超出了海森堡的预测;这些库存分别是德国战时估计可用库存的1.2倍和1.8倍。此外,我们确定他们的石墨含有3.4 wppm的硼杂质,并且从先前的B7实验中重新使用,在假设的石墨-天然铀堆中不允许临界。德国的石墨是由冶金焦炭制成的,这种焦炭比以石油焦炭为基础的石墨天然地携带更多的硼,而石油焦炭在美国是可用的,并且是唯一使芝加哥1号堆达到临界状态的材料。我们的研究结果表明,德国在第二次世界大战中既不可能建造重水反应堆,也不可能建造石墨反应堆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书