Prevalence of person-centered maternity care during childbirth and its predictors among women who gave birth in health facilities of East Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8
PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2026-09-29 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0005909
Yaregal Admasu Alelign, Chernet Getnet, Alemitu Ayele, Derese Eshetu Debela, Degefa Gomora, Aynamaw Embiale, Yordanos Sintayehu, Neway Ejigu
{"title":"Prevalence of person-centered maternity care during childbirth and its predictors among women who gave birth in health facilities of East Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yaregal Admasu Alelign, Chernet Getnet, Alemitu Ayele, Derese Eshetu Debela, Degefa Gomora, Aynamaw Embiale, Yordanos Sintayehu, Neway Ejigu","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0005909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Poor quality care significantly contributes to preventable maternal morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, where respectful and responsive childbirth care remains variable. Person-centered maternity care (PCMC) is a crucial element of the WHO maternal and newborn quality-of-care framework; however, region-specific synthesis is lacking. This review aimed to estimate the pooled mean PCMC score and identify its predictors among postpartum women in East Africa. We systematically searched PubMed, Research4Life, ScienceDirect, DOAJ, and Google Scholar for observational studies conducted from 2017 to 2025. Study quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. Random-effects meta-analysis using the DerSimonian-Laird estimator was performed, and subgroup and meta-regression analyses were used to explore heterogeneity. Twenty three studies involving 15,325 women were included. The pooled mean PCMC score in East Africa was 63.08% (95% CI: 59.19, 66.97). Domain-specific scores were highest for dignity and respect (78.05%; 95% CI: 74.43-81.67), followed by supportive care (62.59%; 95% CI: 59.44-65.73), and lowest for communication and autonomy (55.29%; 95% CI: 48.66-61.92), demonstrating significant gaps in provider-patient communication and shared decision-making. Lower PCMC scores were associated with nighttime delivery (β = -2.23; 95% CI: -3.35, -1.11), third-trimester antenatal care initiation (β = -4.06; 95% CI: -7.74, -0.38), and rural residence (β = -1.61; 95% CI: -2.60, -0.61), while higher maternal education was positively associated with PCMC. PCMC in East Africa remains suboptimal, predominantly in the communication, autonomy, and supportive care domains. Reinforcing provider communication and shared decision-making skills, improving night-shift staffing and supervision, integrating PCMC indicators into quality monitoring systems, and expanding community-level interventions through task-shifting and community engagement strategies are recommended. Future research should prioritize implementation and intervention studies targeting identified gaps. The protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024576229).</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"6 9","pages":"e0005909"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13623155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poor quality care significantly contributes to preventable maternal morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, where respectful and responsive childbirth care remains variable. Person-centered maternity care (PCMC) is a crucial element of the WHO maternal and newborn quality-of-care framework; however, region-specific synthesis is lacking. This review aimed to estimate the pooled mean PCMC score and identify its predictors among postpartum women in East Africa. We systematically searched PubMed, Research4Life, ScienceDirect, DOAJ, and Google Scholar for observational studies conducted from 2017 to 2025. Study quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. Random-effects meta-analysis using the DerSimonian-Laird estimator was performed, and subgroup and meta-regression analyses were used to explore heterogeneity. Twenty three studies involving 15,325 women were included. The pooled mean PCMC score in East Africa was 63.08% (95% CI: 59.19, 66.97). Domain-specific scores were highest for dignity and respect (78.05%; 95% CI: 74.43-81.67), followed by supportive care (62.59%; 95% CI: 59.44-65.73), and lowest for communication and autonomy (55.29%; 95% CI: 48.66-61.92), demonstrating significant gaps in provider-patient communication and shared decision-making. Lower PCMC scores were associated with nighttime delivery (β = -2.23; 95% CI: -3.35, -1.11), third-trimester antenatal care initiation (β = -4.06; 95% CI: -7.74, -0.38), and rural residence (β = -1.61; 95% CI: -2.60, -0.61), while higher maternal education was positively associated with PCMC. PCMC in East Africa remains suboptimal, predominantly in the communication, autonomy, and supportive care domains. Reinforcing provider communication and shared decision-making skills, improving night-shift staffing and supervision, integrating PCMC indicators into quality monitoring systems, and expanding community-level interventions through task-shifting and community engagement strategies are recommended. Future research should prioritize implementation and intervention studies targeting identified gaps. The protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024576229).

在东非卫生机构分娩的妇女中,分娩期间以人为中心的产妇护理的流行率及其预测因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
在撒哈拉以南非洲,低质量的护理在很大程度上导致了可预防的孕产妇发病率和死亡率,在那里,尊重和响应性的分娩护理仍然不稳定。以人为本的孕产妇保健是世卫组织孕产妇和新生儿保健质量框架的一个关键要素;然而,缺乏针对特定区域的综合。本综述旨在估计汇总平均PCMC评分,并确定其预测因子在东非产后妇女。我们系统地检索了PubMed、Research4Life、ScienceDirect、DOAJ和b谷歌Scholar,检索了2017年至2025年进行的观察性研究。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估清单对研究质量进行评估。采用dersimonan - laird估计器进行随机效应荟萃分析,并使用亚组和荟萃回归分析来探索异质性。共有23项研究,涉及15325名女性。东非的PCMC合并平均评分为63.08% (95% CI: 59.19, 66.97)。具体领域得分最高的是尊严和尊重(78.05%;95% CI: 74.43-81.67),其次是支持性护理(62.59%;95% CI: 59.44-65.73),最低的是沟通和自主(55.29%;95% CI: 48.66-61.92),表明在医患沟通和共同决策方面存在显著差距。较低的PCMC评分与夜间分娩(β = -2.23; 95% CI: -3.35, -1.11)、妊娠晚期产前护理起始(β = -4.06; 95% CI: -7.74, -0.38)和农村居住(β = -1.61; 95% CI: -2.60, -0.61)相关,而较高的孕产妇教育水平与PCMC呈正相关。东非的PCMC仍然不是最理想的,主要是在沟通、自主和支持性护理领域。建议加强提供者沟通和共享决策技能,改善夜班人员配备和监督,将PCMC指标纳入质量监测系统,并通过任务转移和社区参与战略扩大社区一级的干预措施。未来的研究应优先考虑针对已确定差距的实施和干预研究。该协议已在PROSPERO (CRD42024576229)中注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书