Artificial Intelligence in Dental Examinations: Performance Analysis of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Undergraduate Students.

IF 2.9 4区 教育学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Cleide Gisele Ribeiro, Rodrigo Guerra de Oliveira, Fernanda Ribeiro Porto, Fernando Luiz Hespanhol, Antônio Márcio Lima Ferraz Júnior
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Dental Examinations: Performance Analysis of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Undergraduate Students.","authors":"Cleide Gisele Ribeiro, Rodrigo Guerra de Oliveira, Fernanda Ribeiro Porto, Fernando Luiz Hespanhol, Antônio Márcio Lima Ferraz Júnior","doi":"10.1111/eje.70319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>AI chatbots can provide personalised health information, solve examinations, and answer specialised questions. Ensuring the accuracy of these tools is essential due to the potential consequences of incorrect information. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of large language models and undergraduate students in solving questions from dental examinations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Examination questions were entered into the paid version of ChatGPT-5 (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA, USA) and the free version of Gemini (Google, CA, USA) on the same day. Performance was assessed by success rate (accuracy) and compared with student scores. The analysis considered multiple variables, including the number of words used in the responses, the cognitive complexity level of the questions, and the specific areas of knowledge assessed. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), adopting a 5% significance level (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all examinations, ChatGPT and Gemini showed similar performance, with consistently high accuracy rates that exceeded those of the students. For low-complexity questions, both models achieved 100% accuracy. For medium-complexity items, performance ranged from 90% to 100%. In high-complexity questions, accuracy decreased, with ChatGPT reaching 78.6% and Gemini 71.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The large language models evaluated in this study demonstrated strong performance across all assessments, consistently outperforming undergraduate dental students. Although the integration of artificial intelligence into dentistry is still evolving, its potential clinical applications and value as a tool for accessing and managing information highlight its growing relevance in dental education and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.70319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: AI chatbots can provide personalised health information, solve examinations, and answer specialised questions. Ensuring the accuracy of these tools is essential due to the potential consequences of incorrect information. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of large language models and undergraduate students in solving questions from dental examinations.

Materials and methods: Examination questions were entered into the paid version of ChatGPT-5 (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA, USA) and the free version of Gemini (Google, CA, USA) on the same day. Performance was assessed by success rate (accuracy) and compared with student scores. The analysis considered multiple variables, including the number of words used in the responses, the cognitive complexity level of the questions, and the specific areas of knowledge assessed. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), adopting a 5% significance level (p < 0.05).

Results: Across all examinations, ChatGPT and Gemini showed similar performance, with consistently high accuracy rates that exceeded those of the students. For low-complexity questions, both models achieved 100% accuracy. For medium-complexity items, performance ranged from 90% to 100%. In high-complexity questions, accuracy decreased, with ChatGPT reaching 78.6% and Gemini 71.4%.

Conclusion: The large language models evaluated in this study demonstrated strong performance across all assessments, consistently outperforming undergraduate dental students. Although the integration of artificial intelligence into dentistry is still evolving, its potential clinical applications and value as a tool for accessing and managing information highlight its growing relevance in dental education and practice.

人工智能在牙科检查中的应用:ChatGPT、Gemini和本科生的表现分析。
简介:人工智能聊天机器人可以提供个性化的健康信息,解决检查问题,回答专业问题。由于不正确信息的潜在后果,确保这些工具的准确性至关重要。本研究旨在评估大型语言模型和大学生在解决牙科考试问题上的表现。材料和方法:考题当天分别输入ChatGPT-5付费版(OpenAI, San Francisco, CA, USA)和Gemini免费版(谷歌,CA, USA)。通过成功率(准确率)来评估成绩,并与学生成绩进行比较。分析考虑了多个变量,包括回答中使用的单词数量,问题的认知复杂性水平,以及评估的特定知识领域。采用IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0版本(IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA)进行统计分析,采用5%显著性水平(p)。结果:在所有考试中,ChatGPT和Gemini表现出相似的表现,准确率始终高于学生。对于低复杂性的问题,两种模型都达到了100%的准确率。对于中等复杂程度的项目,性能从90%到100%不等。在高度复杂的问题中,准确率下降,ChatGPT达到78.6%,Gemini达到71.4%。结论:本研究中评估的大型语言模型在所有评估中都表现出色,始终优于牙科本科学生。尽管人工智能与牙科的整合仍在不断发展,但其作为访问和管理信息的工具的潜在临床应用和价值凸显了其在牙科教育和实践中的日益重要的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the European Journal of Dental Education is to publish original topical and review articles of the highest quality in the field of Dental Education. The Journal seeks to disseminate widely the latest information on curriculum development teaching methodologies assessment techniques and quality assurance in the fields of dental undergraduate and postgraduate education and dental auxiliary personnel training. The scope includes the dental educational aspects of the basic medical sciences the behavioural sciences the interface with medical education information technology and distance learning and educational audit. Papers embodying the results of high-quality educational research of relevance to dentistry are particularly encouraged as are evidence-based reports of novel and established educational programmes and their outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书