Cleide Gisele Ribeiro, Rodrigo Guerra de Oliveira, Fernanda Ribeiro Porto, Fernando Luiz Hespanhol, Antônio Márcio Lima Ferraz Júnior
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Dental Examinations: Performance Analysis of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Undergraduate Students.","authors":"Cleide Gisele Ribeiro, Rodrigo Guerra de Oliveira, Fernanda Ribeiro Porto, Fernando Luiz Hespanhol, Antônio Márcio Lima Ferraz Júnior","doi":"10.1111/eje.70319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>AI chatbots can provide personalised health information, solve examinations, and answer specialised questions. Ensuring the accuracy of these tools is essential due to the potential consequences of incorrect information. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of large language models and undergraduate students in solving questions from dental examinations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Examination questions were entered into the paid version of ChatGPT-5 (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA, USA) and the free version of Gemini (Google, CA, USA) on the same day. Performance was assessed by success rate (accuracy) and compared with student scores. The analysis considered multiple variables, including the number of words used in the responses, the cognitive complexity level of the questions, and the specific areas of knowledge assessed. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), adopting a 5% significance level (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all examinations, ChatGPT and Gemini showed similar performance, with consistently high accuracy rates that exceeded those of the students. For low-complexity questions, both models achieved 100% accuracy. For medium-complexity items, performance ranged from 90% to 100%. In high-complexity questions, accuracy decreased, with ChatGPT reaching 78.6% and Gemini 71.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The large language models evaluated in this study demonstrated strong performance across all assessments, consistently outperforming undergraduate dental students. Although the integration of artificial intelligence into dentistry is still evolving, its potential clinical applications and value as a tool for accessing and managing information highlight its growing relevance in dental education and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.70319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: AI chatbots can provide personalised health information, solve examinations, and answer specialised questions. Ensuring the accuracy of these tools is essential due to the potential consequences of incorrect information. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of large language models and undergraduate students in solving questions from dental examinations.
Materials and methods: Examination questions were entered into the paid version of ChatGPT-5 (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA, USA) and the free version of Gemini (Google, CA, USA) on the same day. Performance was assessed by success rate (accuracy) and compared with student scores. The analysis considered multiple variables, including the number of words used in the responses, the cognitive complexity level of the questions, and the specific areas of knowledge assessed. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), adopting a 5% significance level (p < 0.05).
Results: Across all examinations, ChatGPT and Gemini showed similar performance, with consistently high accuracy rates that exceeded those of the students. For low-complexity questions, both models achieved 100% accuracy. For medium-complexity items, performance ranged from 90% to 100%. In high-complexity questions, accuracy decreased, with ChatGPT reaching 78.6% and Gemini 71.4%.
Conclusion: The large language models evaluated in this study demonstrated strong performance across all assessments, consistently outperforming undergraduate dental students. Although the integration of artificial intelligence into dentistry is still evolving, its potential clinical applications and value as a tool for accessing and managing information highlight its growing relevance in dental education and practice.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the European Journal of Dental Education is to publish original topical and review articles of the highest quality in the field of Dental Education. The Journal seeks to disseminate widely the latest information on curriculum development teaching methodologies assessment techniques and quality assurance in the fields of dental undergraduate and postgraduate education and dental auxiliary personnel training. The scope includes the dental educational aspects of the basic medical sciences the behavioural sciences the interface with medical education information technology and distance learning and educational audit. Papers embodying the results of high-quality educational research of relevance to dentistry are particularly encouraged as are evidence-based reports of novel and established educational programmes and their outcomes.