Effects of reward magnitude on rats' long-term spatial memory retention in the radial-arm maze.

IF 1.9 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Kanji Hayashida, Tohru Taniuchi
{"title":"Effects of reward magnitude on rats' long-term spatial memory retention in the radial-arm maze.","authors":"Kanji Hayashida, Tohru Taniuchi","doi":"10.3758/s13420-026-00726-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our study examined whether reward magnitude affects long-term spatial memory retention in rats performing a radial-arm maze task. Previous studies, using a forced-choice learning phase followed by a free-choice test, have reported retention of up to 72 hours, but they typically used a large reward (10 pellets per arm; 45 mg each) rather than the standard reward (one pellet per arm), leaving open a reward-based explanation. In Experiment 1, we conducted a between-subjects comparison of two reward conditions: a standard-reward group (one pellet per arm) and a large-reward group (10 pellets per arm). The delay interval was progressively extended from 1 min to 1 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr, and 72 hr. Both groups performed significantly above chance at all delays, including 72 hr, and performance did not differ significantly between reward conditions. In Experiment 2, we tested whether relative changes in reward magnitude modulate retention. Within each reward group, reward magnitude was increased or decreased for only one arm during the learning phase, followed by a 24-hr retention test. Accuracy for the arm with the changed reward did not differ significantly from that of the unchanged arms. Together, these findings show that 72-hr retention can be obtained, even with the standard small reward (one pellet), and that radial-arm maze performance is robust to both absolute reward magnitude and relative changes in reward.</p>","PeriodicalId":49914,"journal":{"name":"Learning & Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-026-00726-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our study examined whether reward magnitude affects long-term spatial memory retention in rats performing a radial-arm maze task. Previous studies, using a forced-choice learning phase followed by a free-choice test, have reported retention of up to 72 hours, but they typically used a large reward (10 pellets per arm; 45 mg each) rather than the standard reward (one pellet per arm), leaving open a reward-based explanation. In Experiment 1, we conducted a between-subjects comparison of two reward conditions: a standard-reward group (one pellet per arm) and a large-reward group (10 pellets per arm). The delay interval was progressively extended from 1 min to 1 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr, and 72 hr. Both groups performed significantly above chance at all delays, including 72 hr, and performance did not differ significantly between reward conditions. In Experiment 2, we tested whether relative changes in reward magnitude modulate retention. Within each reward group, reward magnitude was increased or decreased for only one arm during the learning phase, followed by a 24-hr retention test. Accuracy for the arm with the changed reward did not differ significantly from that of the unchanged arms. Together, these findings show that 72-hr retention can be obtained, even with the standard small reward (one pellet), and that radial-arm maze performance is robust to both absolute reward magnitude and relative changes in reward.

奖励大小对桡臂迷宫大鼠长期空间记忆保持的影响。
我们的研究考察了在执行桡臂迷宫任务的大鼠中,奖励大小是否影响长期空间记忆保留。之前的研究使用了强制选择学习阶段,然后是自由选择测试,结果显示老鼠的滞留时间长达72小时,但他们通常使用大奖励(每只手臂10粒;每只手臂45毫克),而不是标准奖励(每只手臂1粒),这留下了一个基于奖励的解释。在实验1中,我们对两种奖励条件进行了受试者之间的比较:标准奖励组(每只手臂一个颗粒)和大奖励组(每只手臂10个颗粒)。延迟时间由1 min逐渐延长至1小时、24小时、48小时和72小时。两组在所有延迟(包括72小时)中的表现都明显高于随机,在不同奖励条件下的表现也没有显著差异。在实验2中,我们测试了奖励大小的相对变化是否会调节保留率。在每个奖励组中,在学习阶段,只有一只手臂的奖励量增加或减少,随后进行24小时的保留测试。奖励改变的手臂与未改变的手臂的准确率没有显著差异。总之,这些发现表明,即使使用标准的小奖励(一个颗粒),也可以获得72小时的保留,并且径向臂迷宫的表现对绝对奖励大小和奖励的相对变化都是稳健的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning & Behavior
Learning & Behavior 医学-动物学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Learning & Behavior publishes experimental and theoretical contributions and critical reviews concerning fundamental processes of learning and behavior in nonhuman and human animals. Topics covered include sensation, perception, conditioning, learning, attention, memory, motivation, emotion, development, social behavior, and comparative investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书