Combined baseline P1NP and TRAcP5b classification predicts differential bone mineral density response to romosozumab: A retrospective cohort study of 287 postmenopausal women
Ryo Nakano, Ayumi Ichisawa, Kenya Saruta, Masakazu Kogawa, Akira Fukuda
{"title":"Combined baseline P1NP and TRAcP5b classification predicts differential bone mineral density response to romosozumab: A retrospective cohort study of 287 postmenopausal women","authors":"Ryo Nakano, Ayumi Ichisawa, Kenya Saruta, Masakazu Kogawa, Akira Fukuda","doi":"10.1016/j.jocd.2026.101747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Introduction</em> Individual bone turnover markers predict bone mineral density response to romosozumab; however, their combined assessment has not been evaluated. We investigated whether a simple classification based on baseline procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b levels predicts differential lumbar spine bone mineral density response and fracture risk during romosozumab treatment.</div><div><em>Methods:</em> This retrospective study analyzed 287 female patients (mean age, 76.9 years) treated with 210 mg monthly romosozumab for 12 months at a single center in Japan (2019–2025). Patients were classified into four groups by baseline procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b levels above or below the women-only cohort median (59.5 ng/mL and 456 mU/dL, respectively): both high (n = 114), high/low (n = 30), low/high (n = 31), and both low (n = 112). A pre-specified sensitivity analysis used fixed cutoffs from published Japanese premenopausal reference data (65 ng/mL; 440 mU/dL).</div><div><em>Results:</em> Lumbar spine bone mineral density change differed significantly across groups (Kruskal–Wallis p < 0.001). The both-high group showed the highest median gain (+11.0%), with 55.0% achieving > 10% increase, while the both-low group showed the lowest (+6.0%, 19.1% achieving > 10%; pairwise p < 0.001). The fracture rate was 2.6% versus 11.7% (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.009). Multivariate logistic regression confirmed both-high status as an independent predictor of >10% response (odds ratio 3.35, 95% confidence interval 1.71–6.55, p < 0.001) and prior treatment as a negative predictor (odds ratio 0.38, p = 0.003). The sensitivity analysis with fixed cutoffs yielded qualitatively identical results (both-high odds ratio 2.84, 95% confidence interval 1.47–5.48, p = 0.002).</div><div><em>Conclusions:</em> Combined baseline procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b classification identified postmenopausal women with differential bone mineral density responses to romosozumab. The concordance between empirical cohort medians and published Japanese premenopausal upper reference limits suggests the classification can be operationalized with fixed, externally derived cutoffs in future studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","volume":"29 4","pages":"Article 101747"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695026000818","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction Individual bone turnover markers predict bone mineral density response to romosozumab; however, their combined assessment has not been evaluated. We investigated whether a simple classification based on baseline procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b levels predicts differential lumbar spine bone mineral density response and fracture risk during romosozumab treatment.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 287 female patients (mean age, 76.9 years) treated with 210 mg monthly romosozumab for 12 months at a single center in Japan (2019–2025). Patients were classified into four groups by baseline procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b levels above or below the women-only cohort median (59.5 ng/mL and 456 mU/dL, respectively): both high (n = 114), high/low (n = 30), low/high (n = 31), and both low (n = 112). A pre-specified sensitivity analysis used fixed cutoffs from published Japanese premenopausal reference data (65 ng/mL; 440 mU/dL).
Results: Lumbar spine bone mineral density change differed significantly across groups (Kruskal–Wallis p < 0.001). The both-high group showed the highest median gain (+11.0%), with 55.0% achieving > 10% increase, while the both-low group showed the lowest (+6.0%, 19.1% achieving > 10%; pairwise p < 0.001). The fracture rate was 2.6% versus 11.7% (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.009). Multivariate logistic regression confirmed both-high status as an independent predictor of >10% response (odds ratio 3.35, 95% confidence interval 1.71–6.55, p < 0.001) and prior treatment as a negative predictor (odds ratio 0.38, p = 0.003). The sensitivity analysis with fixed cutoffs yielded qualitatively identical results (both-high odds ratio 2.84, 95% confidence interval 1.47–5.48, p = 0.002).
Conclusions: Combined baseline procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b classification identified postmenopausal women with differential bone mineral density responses to romosozumab. The concordance between empirical cohort medians and published Japanese premenopausal upper reference limits suggests the classification can be operationalized with fixed, externally derived cutoffs in future studies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal is committed to serving ISCD''s mission - the education of heterogenous physician specialties and technologists who are involved in the clinical assessment of skeletal health. The focus of JCD is bone mass measurement, including epidemiology of bone mass, how drugs and diseases alter bone mass, new techniques and quality assurance in bone mass imaging technologies, and bone mass health/economics.
Combining high quality research and review articles with sound, practice-oriented advice, JCD meets the diverse diagnostic and management needs of radiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists, rheumatologists, gynecologists, family physicians, internists, and technologists whose patients require diagnostic clinical densitometry for therapeutic management.